Undid revision 1229649038byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) kk
|
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:KylieTastic/Archive 2024) (bot
|
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Anyone for improving [[Château de Bourdeilles]]? [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
Anyone for improving [[Château de Bourdeilles]]? [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
== TNPL Teams == |
|||
Greetings from Ungal Naan 2.0. |
|||
Sir, what is the procedure to reopening those articles ([[Salem Spartans]], [[Chepauk Super Gillies]], [[Lyca Kovai Kings]], [[IDream Tiruppur Tamizhans]], [[Siechem Madurai Panthers]], [[Ruby Trichy Warriors|Trichy Grand Cholas]], [[Nellai Royal Kings]] & [[Dindigul Dragons]])? [[User:Ungal Naan2.0|Ungal Naan2.0]] ([[User talk:Ungal Naan2.0|talk]]) 04:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi [[User:Ungal Naan2.0|Ungal Naan2.0]], when articles are deleted via [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] there two ways to proceed. In this case the best way to proceed would be to go to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. In some case if new sources become available that clearly counter the points made in the discussion and notability can be shown then the article can be boldly un-deleted/un-redireted and updated. For articles such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Spartans in 2021]] that are about a historical season it is unlikely such new information will be available. Also if someone disagrees that the new sources do invalidate the discussion that may just redirect again, so this method is usually for clear cut cases and thus [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] is a safer way to go. Hope that helps, Regards [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic#top|talk]]) 09:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Sandbox Review == |
== Sandbox Review == |
|
If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:TeahouseorClick this to start a New Question here |
![]() |
Less active for a while - several concurrent real life problems... (May 2024) |
![]() |
AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 2,937 pending submissions |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() |
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already! |
Maliner (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone for improving Château de Bourdeilles?Drmies (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that you and User:MicrobiologyMarcus and I were in a race about an hour ago. And that is why what Wikipedia calls edit conflicts are known in computer science and electrical engineering as race conditions. Some sandboxes are worth reviewing, and some are not. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thansk for helping edit the page for David Conlon Stockport County. I am knew to this. Thank you Countystat (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am new to this but it seemed you accepted ands then redirect the above page I was trying to do (apologies as new to this) - 'Dave Conlon'.
I now can not find the draft and wanted to have this article as a stand alone page. I wanted the link from other pagers where it had the name (Dave Conlon) to take you to that specific page.
Please can you help and advise, thanks in advance Countystat (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing up my confusion with linking social media on the Black Peoples Union draft, sorry for reverting that! Charmanderpants (talk) 00:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]