Contents

User talk:Lewismaster

This is Lewismaster's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 20 days

Thanks for uploading File:Schugar Schenker UC .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Blue Oyster Cult 1988.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Mark Gray Boogie Hotel.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harem Scarem - Melodicrock EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jackyl night of the living dead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Machine II Machine: Electric Club Mixes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No opposition here to deletion. Lewismaster (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is just blatantly incorrect. I think you need to read the current MOS, specifically MOS:TABLECAPTION. All tables on Wikipedia require captions now per an RfC in 2020 (see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Archive 15#RfC on table captions) and WP:ACCESSIBILITY, which is a Wikimedia policy and a Wikipedia guideline. They also should have scope="col" for column headers to delineate what are columns for those who use screen readers (see MOS:DTT)—removing captions and scopes makes Wikipedia less accessible to visually impaired readers who make use of them. Third-level headings should typically follow second-level headings; headings should not be bolded with semicolons per WP:PSEUDOHEAD. Delinking common terms is part of our MoS and is at WP:OVERLINKING. So yes, that formatting absolutely does respect our current MOS. I'm not sure how you think my edit was not in line with our Manual of Style. Ss112 19:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the MOS has changed from the my time as a full-time editor. I have been scolded more than once in the past for adding captions and capital letters or changing headings, like you did. Those things have apparently become canon now, which is fine for me. Lewismaster (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]