Contents

User talk:Polarlys: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:36, 29 August 2023

Hello, Polarlys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 16:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your welcome message. I am user on de.wikipedia.org and familiar with wikipedia related topics. All I do here is adding german interwiki links. Bye, --Polarlys 07:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Polarlys! If part of an article is a copyright violation, either remove it or (better) edit the language so that it's not an exact copy. When a topic is clearly notable (such as this one, a city), it's better not to tag the whole article for speedy deletion. Thanks, NawlinWiki 16:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But the copyvio remains in the article’s history? --Polarlys 17:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've not got any mail from you. You might wish to resend it. --Deskana (banana) 23:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sent it again. --Polarlys 16:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for failing to assume good faith. You are attacking me [1] for creating stubs after at discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. I was trying to help by sorting out names, finding out that there are two different persons, father and son, creating stubs with the scarce information available online in short time. I've informed about the creation of the stubs at WP:RS and GSWN. As it turns out, "the community" apparently has few if any positive interest in these stubs, so I'll nominate them for deletion unless you retract your accusations and improve both articles. Thank you for you understanding, and get better. -- Matthead  Discuß   10:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to {{db-author}}, the two stubs are gone now. Ashes to ashes. -- Matthead  Discuß   23:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I lost the will to find euphemisms for bad work, neglecting fundamental project guidelines. --Polarlys (talk) 22:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that some users attempt to censor Nazi warcrimes; others do the same for other controversial areas (Soviet crimes, Isreal-Palestinian conflict, evolution vs creationism... you name it). But in the end, majority of editors don't subscribe to such views, and attempts by biased editors to push their POV are reverted - so don't loose heart. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both here and in the future please consider adequately explaining the copyright problem you flag so that editors can resolve them. All I found was the copy/pasted flagging post. I responded to what I have to guess is your complaint with the article on the Talk page. Jeremyblock (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^t|c 20:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Polarlys (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

byThe Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^t|c 14:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bad North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Polarlys! i noticed that you recently deleted from commons the file MaryinaRoschaStation.jpg. although i was not the user who uploaded the file, i did notice that the image appears to have been used here on stroi.mos.ru, a site run by the government of moscow, and had assumed that it was freely licensed, as noted by the stroi.mos.ru template at commons. is this not the case? dying (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dying:, I am sorry I just saw your message now. The file wasn’t properly attributed and I could find a free license. Feel free to upload the file again. Regards, --Polarlys (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polarlys, i was not the original uploader; i admittedly have yet to contribute to commons, and am unfamiliar with its processes. as you are a commons administrator, is it possible for you to undelete the file and add the necessary tags? i have provided a source of the photo for you. is there any other information you would need for this photo to be undeleted? dying (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t verify if the file was available on the website, as the original weblink is broken and the archive link does not load properly. I also speak no Russian, so I can’t verify if there is some exception for some of the content on the website. Sorry, --Polarlys (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]