aircraft template
|
→Aircraft Template: add comment
|
||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
--[[User:Merond e/Userboxes|<font color="orange">'''M'''</font>]][[User talk:Merond e|<font color="purple">'''e'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Merond e|<font color="green">'''r'''</font>]][[User:Merond e|o]]nd [[User:Merond e|e]] 20:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:Merond e/Userboxes|<font color="orange">'''M'''</font>]][[User talk:Merond e|<font color="purple">'''e'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Merond e|<font color="green">'''r'''</font>]][[User:Merond e|o]]nd [[User:Merond e|e]] 20:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Oh, I see you've redirected it already. Great! --[[User:Merond e/Userboxes|<font color="orange">'''M'''</font>]][[User talk:Merond e|<font color="purple">'''e'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Merond e|<font color="green">'''r'''</font>]][[User:Merond e|o]]nd [[User:Merond e|e]] 20:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) |
Hi, Sorry I'm not sure if this is the correct way to contact you but its regarding the entry for 'Tilly bailey Irvine'. I note you removed information on the history of them because of a potential copyright issue with my This is Hartlepool website which for some reason made the news! I just wanted to confirm that they sought my permission last week and I said it was OK to use information from my site. Feel free to add it back in if you like, I'll leave that up to you. Just to confirm I do own This is Hartlepool Ive added the following confirmation page: [1] . Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.128.144 (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a sign of life? hope all is well and welcome back. MilborneOne (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys! A little over a year ago, I took up a very exciting new job. It's a fast-paced company, and initially, I was taking a lot of work home which effectively absorbed the time I had available for Wikipedia. Since then, things have settled down somewhat, and I'm happy to be able to start contributing again. It's nice to have been missed :) --Rlandmann (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied to your question on my talk page, to keep it all in one place. Welcome back from me too! --TraceyR (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know most of the missing aircraft were added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Missing articles which I have been working through. I have been trying to create redirects or articles for them all. I didnt create it and it includes a lot of unbuilt stuff that appears in various templates. I intend just to delete them from the templates and remove them from the list eventually as I am sure most unbuilt projects are not really notable but they have been added to templates to complete sequences! When you finish JAE ! I would welcome your opinion. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Yak-141 is fictitious and was only used for propaganda purposes when registering the records set in '75 white' with the FAI.
I have changed the article to Yak-41, but I shall go back and add Yak-141 to the variantsa list as an explanation inb the articlePetebutt (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rlandmann. You have new messages at 84user's talk page.
Message added 13:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
(exploring other ways to improve navigation for readers) -84user (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your recent edit on this article, and I am kinda opposing the move. The project consist of at least 3 models, the 1/2, M01 and M02, so naming it the M02 is a bit specifying the whole thing too much. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk 16:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi RL, is this you [2]? If it is I just bought one of the kits that you edited!! Cheers. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi RL, Thanks for your comments on the Slingsby glider photos I submitted (tried to submit). I must admit that learning how to contribute to Wikipedia is worse than learning Greek - a skill I've yet to master. I did spend several hours trying to understand the various 'help' articles - but it is like trying to knit spaghetti. It may be clear to the people who have been involved with this for many years - but speaking as a lifelong teacher, writer and professional editor - I am not sure I have the energy to get to grips with this. The 'help' notes seem designed to reduce the reader to biting the desktop and screaming: tautologies abound and I have yet to find a single article that says: "this is how you insert an image and place it on the page".
I wanted to respond to your request for a citation - in respect of a source for my assertion that there are still about 30 Skylark 4's in operational condition. The reference is here by the way:
So I looked up citations in 'help' and after 20 minutes wrestling with slippery eels, I am no nearer to being able to insert a citation than when I started. I might add that I have written several theses and am quite familiar with citations and footnotes.
If you can point me to a clear, lucid, exemplified help file that shows me how to contribute I will follow it up. Otherwise I will leave it to you Greek speakers.
Cheers
Graham —Preceding unsigned comment added by Borderglider (talk • contribs) 10:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble with the Zenair CH 50 (or Mini Z) is that there is very little information about it Jane's 82 has some specs and the fact that it first flew in 1979, but very little else - I'm not clear whether or not any plans were sold, or any more than the first prototype was built. I can't find anything useful anywhere else.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Glad I could help out there. I find a few pictures really spruce up the aircraft type articles. Now that I have most of mine indexed and accessible it is just a matter of searching to see if I have any when I see a new article listed at Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft). I found some to add to Nigel's articles on the Zenair CH 200 and 300 as well! - Ahunt (talk) 02:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted that page in under 3 minutes: not even time to work on it. People want to reference things but they don't know best how it's done.
Thanks for your help - much appreciated.
Can you look at this for me please. i can't get the table right. Some entries won't show the lines in between them. Perhaps a suggestion on how to do it better? ThanksPetebutt (talk) 10:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)oops got the wrong page, this is the one I meantPetebutt (talk) 10:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up. :) I can see advantages and disadvantages to both templates; I'll keep the issues in mind when deciding what to use. - The Bushranger (talk) 16:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the note. Perhaps we should mark {{WikiProject Aircraft}} somehow so others won't make the same mistake.
--Merond e 20:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]