This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi TheChunky! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
An article you recently created, Basant Rath, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 00:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the negative BLP and controversies. They had undue weight and inadequate sourcing. Please wait for an independent AfC reviewer to examine this BLP closely.03:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC) --Deepfriedokra(talk)
Deepfriedokra I added all the controversy section from independent sources. As he became viral due to these controversies which was covered by number of independent media. I didn't endorse negative or positive. I write what it happens actually from the independent source. There is no objection source against it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)
Given your lack of understanding of negative WP:BLP, you used inadequately sourced content to heap criticism on someone-- in Wikipedia's voice. I don't think you should be accepting BLP's at AfC. (@Theroadislong: in case they want to add more) WIth the backlog at AfC, I don't think you should be accepting articles you create. --Deepfriedokra(talk)17:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trying to be insulting, TheChunky, but from your posts here, and the content at the draft, it appears your command of English isn't very good. This is an English language document. A command of English at the college level is expected of our editors. There are many other-language Wikipedias. Perhaps your time would be spent editing in a language you can write well in. John from Idegon (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
John from Idegon well, your point is good that a person who knows good english can edit en.wiki . But let me tell you, I have created many articles till now and the Draft:Basant Rath had information which was removed by the above admin, as he claims it was negative BLP. So let me clarify, I am not enemy or hater of that person. I am his fan. Even I didn't got any chance to talk to him. The things I mentioned in the article was from independent sources. It is same person. You can check his official twitter. He always remained in controversies. So I added same. He was suspended, transferred for these controversies and I added same.
Remaining the thing about my english. I started this article about a month ago. I completed it at my level. So I moved it to mainspace. So that grammar or other remaining mistakes will be fixed by other editors. I am not much active these days due to some personal reasons. Today I was reading something on wiki and I got the notification, so I came here for explaining you all. I am still busy for a month. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)
Wow...your idea of collaberation is you create a mess and someone else cleans it up? What an incredibly selfish attitude. Sorry, competence is required and my 8 year old son has better English skills than you. It's time you grow up enough to realize that Wikipedia is here to help people, not so YOU CAN GET HELP WITH YOU MISERABLE ENGLISH SKILLS FOR FREE. Nothing about Wikipedia is about you, you selfish jerk. It's about our readers. How's about I come over to your house and practice my non existent skills at open cranium brain surgery on you? Do you think that would be helpful? Neither are your non existent skills at English. When I was growing up, I was taught not to do things that make more work for other people. Apparently, that isn't part of your particular moral structure, or lack of it. However it does apply here. You do not have the competence to contribute to a formal English document at a college English level. So go to a language wiki for a language you are competent in, or take enough English language courses until your competency increases. We are not an English tutoring service. John from Idegon (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So I guess we can add English Comprehension to the things you lack competence at too. I didn't mention WP:OWN at all. This is a collaborative project. If you lack competence to communicate effectively in this website's ONLY language, what contribution do you think you can make? Content decisions are based on consensus, and in order to form one, you have to have at least a similar level of competence in the language we use here for communication. It's frankly extreamly self-centered and arrogant of you. John from Idegon (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
HiTheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need review on this, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
