No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in 2019. The faux documentation claims that it creates a draft article on a species based on Wikidata, but {{MbabelS/gen}} contains a taxobox with hard-coded links to plant taxons, along with human biographical information. I asked it to create a draft for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17000333 and it created this nonsense. This appears to be an abandoned experiment that cannot be used to create anything useful. Editors would be much better served by copy/pasting a similar existing article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has been over three years since the previous TFD for these templates, in which everyone suggested deletion. The close allowed for some time for editors to get used to {{Gs/editnotice}} and {{Contentious topics/talk notice}}, which appears to have happened. None of these templates have active transclusions on talk pages. I think we have waited long enough and can delete them now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't really have an objection to deletion, but I wonder if we shouldn't just redirect the bunch to the appropriate Gs/CT template, and that way there isn't room at all for confusion? Vanamonde (Talk)18:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. This minor line extension is still under construction, and as far as I can tell, the one or two stops that it will add can be added to the main line diagram at Line 2 Bloor–Danforth. I don't think this template will ever be needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge this content into the body of the article if it is not already there. Remove it from the two person articles and the park article, which don't logically connect as navbox content. Links in the body or in a See also section should work fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
