The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. Navbox with no main article, and no links to timely articles. Maybe too soon? OK to userfy until it is needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Created in 2019. The faux documentation claims that it creates a draft article on a species based on Wikidata, but {{MbabelS/gen}} contains a taxobox with hard-coded links to plant taxons, along with human biographical information. I asked it to create a draft for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17000333 and it created this nonsense. This appears to be an abandoned experiment that cannot be used to create anything useful. Editors would be much better served by copy/pasting a similar existing article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has been over three years since the previous TFD for these templates, in which everyone suggested deletion. The close allowed for some time for editors to get used to {{Gs/editnotice}} and {{Contentious topics/talk notice}}, which appears to have happened. None of these templates have active transclusions on talk pages. I think we have waited long enough and can delete them now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect --qedk (t愛c) 22:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No objection. Don't forget about the /doc pages, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When pages are deleted the subpages are also deleted. Primefac (talk) 23:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't really have an objection to deletion, but I wonder if we shouldn't just redirect the bunch to the appropriate Gs/CT template, and that way there isn't room at all for confusion? Vanamonde (Talk) 18:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have an issue with deleting them but my preference would be that they are replaced with redirects. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirecting would be fine with me if people feel that it is valuable to preserve the pages' histories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Vanamonde and Callanecc. My understanding is that while these are usually substituted, there's probably a lot of plain text or off-wiki links not counted in the stats. For bureaucratic processes, it's better to avoid link rot by pointing them to whatever process supersedes them for the same reason we tend to mark documentation with {{Historical}}. — Wug·a·po·des 01:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Even though the edit history isn't particularly exiting someone may find a use for it. Also the link rot thing brought up by Wugapodes. Trialpears (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and oppose redirection. Redirecting specific templates to general ones that need parameters to cover the specific use is seriously misleading. * Pppery *it has begun... 02:41, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Enough time has passed from the previous discussion for editors to get used to the new ones. --Gonnym (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. This minor line extension is still under construction, and as far as I can tell, the one or two stops that it will add can be added to the main line diagram at Line 2 Bloor–Danforth. I don't think this template will ever be needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per G7, I am the author. I can also confirm this content has been integrated into {{Line 2 Bloor–Danforth}} as the extension is now under construction. --NaturalRX 14:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only three links in the body of the navbox. Has very little to do with the historic home in New York City. This is mainly a family navbox without any relation to the article on the Van Cortlandt family. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge this content into the body of the article if it is not already there. Remove it from the two person articles and the park article, which don't logically connect as navbox content. Links in the body or in a See also section should work fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All names of family members in this navbox is on the article in that massive family tree. So no need to merge any information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as most of its entries either do not WP:N and are better formatted inside the main article. बिनोद थारू (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
