Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Life  





2 Condemnations  





3 Opposition to and repeal  





4 See also  





5 References  





6 Sources  














Étienne Tempier






Català
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
مصرى
Nederlands

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Étienne Tempier (French: [tɑ̃pje]; also known as Stephanus of Orleans; died 3 September 1279) was a French bishop of Paris during the 13th century. He was Chancellor of the Sorbonne from 1263 to 1268, and bishop of Paris from 1268 until his death.[1]

Étienne Tempier
Bishop of Paris
ChurchRoman Catholic Church
DioceseParis
Appointed7 October 1268
Term ended3 September 1279
PredecessorRenaud Mignon de Corbeil
SuccessorRenaud de Hombliéres
Personal details
Died3 September 1279
Previous post(s)Canon of Notre Dame

He is best remembered for promulgating a Condemnation of 219 philosophical and theological propositions (or articles) that addressed concepts that were being disputed in the faculty of arts at the University of Paris.

Life

[edit]

Born in Orléans, Tempier studied in Paris, where he became master of theology and canon of Notre Dame. During a period of about five years (1263–ca. 1268), Tempier was the Chancellor of the chapter of Notre Dame at Paris, succeeding Erich von Veire. At that time, the Chancellor of the Chapter was also the Chancellor of the University of Paris.

He served as bishop of Paris from 7 October 1268 until his death on 3 September 1279. Tempier had been a master in the faculty of theology.

Condemnations

[edit]

In 1270 Tempier, encouraged by Henry of Ghent (died 1293), had issued a formal condemnation of thirteen doctrines held by "radical Aristotelians". These included the unity of intellect, causal necessity, and the eternity of the world. Further investigation into perceived errors then prevalent at the university was prompted by the Portuguese cleric Juliani, who was elected Pope John XXI on 13 September 1276.[2] A former professor of theology at the University of Paris, he wrote Tempier on 28 January 1277.[3] The pope told Tempier that he had heard reports of heretical opinions in the Paris area, and requested to be informed of the situation. By this time Tempier was already investigating possible heretical opinions at the University of Paris.[4]

On 7 March 1277, Tempier expanded the number of condemned doctrines to 219. He was assisted by a commission of theologians from the University. Henry of Ghent sat on Tempier's episcopal commission (assessores episcopi) of sixteen masters, which produced the syllabus of 219 propositions condemned by Tempier on 7 March 1277. The condemnations against Aristotelianism in Paris involved Giles of Rome, Siger of Brabant, the arts faculty, and certain doctrines of Thomas Aquinas.[5] The forty-ninth item on the list was the assertion that God is incapable of moving the universe because it implies the existence of a void.[6]

Tempier also overturned Aristotle on one point: God could have created more than one world (given His omnipotence) yet we know by revelation He made only one. Tempier's stress on God's omnipotence also opened up all kinds of possibilities for the understanding of the cosmos. In his effort to defend the abilities and unique rights of the Creator, Tempier's propositions led to the new approach taken to understand the workings of celestial and terrestrial bodies. By rejecting that astral bodies were animated, incorruptible and eternal, refuting the idea that their motion was the result of something comparable to animal desires and denying that stars had any influence over individuals, he showed that Christians were prepared to refute Aristotle's world view along with some basic assumptions held by Greek learning.

It is not clear what Tempier's intentions were in issuing this condemnation. Nevertheless, scholars have written that "the Parisian Condemnation of 1277 is symbolic of an intellectual crisis in the University. It is indicative of fundamental shifts in speculative thought and cultural perception which occurred in the late 13th century, which portend aspects of modern thought."[7]

Opposition to and repeal

[edit]

Tempier's prohibitions did not curtail the free discussion of Thomist doctrines and did little to limit their influence at the University of Paris.[2] His decree was actively opposed and eventually overturned in 1325.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Fontaine, Petrus Franciscus Maria (2006). The Light and the Dark: A Cultural History of Dualism. Amsterdam: J.C. Gibben. p. 181. ISBN 90-70265-40-0.
  • ^ a b de Wulf, Maurice (1951). History of Mediæval Philosophy. New York: Nelson. p. 356.
  • ^ Rubenstein, Richard E. (2004). Aristotle's Children: How Christians, Muslims, and Jews Rediscovered Ancient Wisdom and Illuminated the Middle Ages. Orlando: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 231. ISBN 0-15-603009-8.
  • ^ Grant, Edward (2006). Science and Religion, 400 BC to AD 1550: from Aristotle to Copernicus. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 181. ISBN 0-8018-8401-2.
  • ^ Marenbon, John (1998). Medieval Philosophy. London: Routledge. p. 291. ISBN 0-415-05377-3.
  • ^ a b The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet, Margaret Wertheim, W.W. Norton & Company, 2000, pg. 102.
  • ^ Emery, Kent Jr.; Speer, Andreas (2000). "After the Condemnation of 1277: New Evidence, New Perspectives, and Grounds for New Interpretations". Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte. Miscellanea Mediaevalia. Vol. 28. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. p. 1. ISBN 3-11-016933-9.
  • Sources

    [edit]
  • icon Catholicism
  • flag France

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Étienne_Tempier&oldid=1201905437"

    Categories: 
    1279 deaths
    13th-century French Roman Catholic bishops
    13th-century French philosophers
    Bishops of Paris
    Catholic philosophers
    Chancellors of the University of Paris
    Clergy from Orléans
    Scholastic philosophers
    University of Paris
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from March 2023
    Articles needing additional references from March 2017
    All articles needing additional references
    Pages with French IPA
    CS1 German-language sources (de)
    Articles with FAST identifiers
    Articles with ISNI identifiers
    Articles with VIAF identifiers
    Articles with WorldCat Entities identifiers
    Articles with BNF identifiers
    Articles with BNFdata identifiers
    Articles with GND identifiers
    Articles with J9U identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
    Articles with NKC identifiers
    Articles with NLA identifiers
    Articles with NTA identifiers
    Articles with PLWABN identifiers
    Articles with DTBIO identifiers
    Articles with Trove identifiers
    Articles with SUDOC identifiers
    Year of birth missing
     



    This page was last edited on 1 February 2024, at 16:40 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki