Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Question  





2 Background  





3 Result  





4 References  





5 External links  














2013 New Zealand asset sales referendum






Français
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


New Zealand asset sales referendum, 2013

22 November – 13 December 2013 (2013-11-22 – 2013-12-13)

"Do you support the Government selling up to 49 per cent of Meridian Energy, Mighty River Power, Genesis Power, Solid Energy and Air New Zealand?"

Results

Choice

Votes %
Yes 442,985 32.40%
No 920,188 67.30%
Informal votes 4,167 0.30%
Valid votes 1,367,340 99.88%
Invalid or blank votes 1,585 0.12%
Total votes 1,368,925 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 3,037,405 45.07%
Source: Electoral Commission[1]

The 2013 New Zealand asset sales referendum is a citizens-initiated referendum that took place by postal ballot from 22 November 2013 to 13 December 2013. It was on the Fifth National (Key) government's policy to partially privatise four energy-related state-owned enterprises and reducing the government's share in Air New Zealand.

In March 2013, the groups collecting signatures to force the referendum announced that they had achieved enough signatures to comfortably clear the 10% registered voters threshold. However, in May 2013, the clerk of the house announced that the petition was 16,500 signatures short of the number required (308,753), as about 100,000 signatures on the petition were faulty or invalid. The organisers had a further two months to obtain the extra signatures.[2] In September 2013, it was officially confirmed that the added signatures had successfully been collected, with the tally now standing some 18,500 more signatures than required.[3]

The referendum was backed by several prominent New Zealanders, including Dame Anne Salmond, who called it the "only just way" to determine whether asset sales are acceptable.[4]

On 30 September 2013, Prime Minister John Key announced that the referendum would be via postal ballot and would take place between 22 November and 13 December. The cost of the referendum would be $NZD9 million.[5]

John Key said that the Government intended to ignore the results of the referendum, as the 2011 general election gave them a mandate for the sell-off.[6]

The referendum result showed a two to one majority against the proposed asset sales.

Question[edit]

The question asked was:

"Do you support the Government selling up to 49% of Meridian Energy, Mighty River Power, Genesis Power, Solid Energy and Air New Zealand?"

Background[edit]

Protest in opposition to the privatisation of state-owned enterprises in Dunedin, June 2012

The National government was re-elected at the 2011 election on a platform of "Mixed Ownership Model" for the five state-owned companies Meridian Energy, Mighty River Power, Genesis Energy, Solid Energy and Air New Zealand, where a minority stake in the companies would be sold off. This policy was opposed by the opposition. A coalition of groups including the Green Party, Grey Power, Council of Trade Unions (CTU), Labour Party, New Zealand Union of Students' Associations (NZUSA), Greenpeace and others started a petition against it in April 2012.[7] The New Zealand Herald argued in an editorial that the Green Party used parliamentary funding to pay people to collect signatures, which while legal broke a long-standing convention about citizen initiated referendums.[8]

By July 2012, it was reported that nearly 200,000 signatures had been collected, of which 100,000 were collected by the Green Party.[9] As a combined initiative, Labour and the Greens issued a protest T-shirt against asset sales in support of the referendum.[10] By early January 2013, the group had collected 340,000 signatures, more than enough to force a referendum; 10% of registered voters or approximately 310,000 signatures are required to force a referendum, although more are generally required to be collected to account for invalid and duplicate signatures.[7] By late February 2013, 391,000 signatures had been collected.[11] On 12 March 2013, the entire 393,000-signature petition was presented to the House.

Holding a referendum separate from an election process is estimated to cost $9 million.[3] Defending this cost, Russel Norman, Greens co-leader, noted that this cost paled in comparison to the (to September 2013) $100 million cost of the asset sales program itself.[3]

Result[edit]

The referendum took place by postal ballot, opening on 22 November 2013 and closing on 13 December 2013. 45 cent of eligible voters took part. Of those, approximately two-thirds voted against asset sales.

Despite the result of this referendum being not in favour of partial asset sales, Prime Minister John Key announced these partial asset sales would continue. He said: "Three in four New Zealanders said no we don't agree with Labour and the Greens. I think it will be a dismal failure from their point of view."[12] He had also gone on to call the referendum "an utter waste of money" as he had no intention of honouring its results, claiming the Government had been re-elected at the 2011 general election partially on the basis of the pending shares sell-off.[6]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Citizens Initiated Referendum 2013: Final Result". 17 December 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
  • ^ Chapman, Kate (7 May 2013). "Asset sales referendum falls short". Stuff/Fairfax. Retrieved 10 April 2013.
  • ^ a b c "Referendum to be held on asset sales". The New Zealand Herald. 2 September 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  • ^ "Dame Anne Salmond: Time to defend democratic rights". The New Zealand Herald. 14 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  • ^ Bennett, Adam (30 September 2013). "Govt sets date for asset sale referendum". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  • ^ a b "Asset sales referendum 'waste of money' - Key - Politics News | TVNZ". Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  • ^ a b Wannan, Olivia (4 January 2013). "Asset sales petition gets its numbers". Fairfax NZ. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  • ^ "Editorial: Greens' use of public cash for petition wrong". 21 June 2012. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
  • ^ Shuttleworth, Kate (27 July 2012). "200,000 sign asset sale petition". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  • ^ Field, Michael (31 August 2012). "Push for asset sale referendum". Fairfax NZ. Retrieved 5 January 2013.
  • ^ Small, Vernon (28 February 2013). "It's hug-a-judge time for Key over asset sales ruling". The Press. p. A13. Retrieved 2 March 2013.
  • ^ "Asset sales programme to continue: Key". stuff.co.nz.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013_New_Zealand_asset_sales_referendum&oldid=1219313598"

    Categories: 
    Elections in New Zealand
    Referendums in New Zealand
    2013 elections in New Zealand
    2013 referendums
    2013 in New Zealand
    Privatisation referendums
    Privatisation in New Zealand
    Hidden categories: 
    Use New Zealand English from April 2024
    All Wikipedia articles written in New Zealand English
    Use dmy dates from October 2020
    Articles with short description
    Short description with empty Wikidata description
     



    This page was last edited on 17 April 2024, at 00:30 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki