 |
This article relies excessively on referencestoprimary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "A Guide to Grand-Jury Men" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Cover page of the second edition
| |
| Author | Richard Bernard |
|---|---|
| Language | Early Modern English English |
| Series | 2 books in one volume |
| Genre | Occult, Religion, Philosophy, Dissertation, Legal treatise |
Publication date | First Edition: 1627 Second Edition: 1629 |
| Publication place | England |
| Media type | |
A Guide to Grand-Jury Men — in full, A Guide to Grand Jury Men, Divided in two books. In the first, is the Author's best advice to them what to do, before they bring in a Billa vera in cases of Witchcraft, with a Christian Direction to such as are too much given upon every cross to think themselves bewitched. In the Second, is a Treatise touching Witches good and bad, how they may be known, evicted, condemned, with many particulars tending thereunto was first published in 1627 and written by a puritan clergyman named Richard Bernard.[1]
The work is a collection of two dissertations on the legal aspects of witchcraft and how those participating in the trials may be deceived by deceit and counterfeited accounts. It further elaborates on how many natural ills can be taken as bewitchment. Bernard gives advice on how to determine an actual account of witchcraft from that of a false accusation and even more, the signs one should seek to determine if a man is truly bewitched or suffering from a natural sickness.[1]
The dissertation was written to help reform the laws on witchcraft, to educate the men commissioned to seek out, investigate and prosecute instances of witchcraft, and as a guide to witchfinding with a combination of scientific analysis and theological understanding that was not previously used.[1] Previously, the Justices of Peace did not always expect direct evidence, and seeing that the works of witches were works of darkness, there were often no witnesses present with them to accuse them.[2]
The first book covers a wide range of topics but focuses on some key points. The first is the scientific aspect to witchcraft. That strange diseases can happen to both men and animals that are neither inflicted by devils or witches.[A 1] There were many who were falsely accused of witchcraft based on their natural ailments, but it was Richard Bernard's belief that men were also able to counterfeit various claims of bewitchment for their own financial, social or political purpose[A 2] and that if the devil were involved, he could work without the consent or association of a witch. [A 3]
The second book delves into the study of demonology and the theology of witchcraft, and works to prove through theological study what witches are real [A 4] and how a witch is said to enlist a spirit to conduct mischief and bewitch others.[A 5] Bernard explains the behavioral characteristics of an individual most likely to become a witch[A 6] and how the Devil solicits an individual and prepares them to partake in the practices of witchcraft and deceit. [A 7]
Bernard felt that a person who goes to a witch, wizard, or blesser for assistance is just as guilty of witchcraft in the biblical perspective.[A 8] There are also elaborations on the following topics:
|
Magic and witchcraft
| |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Types |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Practices |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Objects |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Folklore and mythology |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Major historic treatises |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Persecution |
| ||||||||||||||||
| In popular culture |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Related |
| ||||||||||||||||
