Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Geography  





2 Excavations  





3 Artifacts and Interpretations  





4 Problems  





5 External links  





6 References  














Baum Site







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Baum Site

U.S. National Register of Historic Places

Nearest cityAydlett, NC Poplar Branch, North Carolina
Area5 acres (2.0 ha)
NRHP reference No.80002818[1]
Added to NRHPDecember 8, 1980

The Baum Site (31Ck9) is one of the most prominent Middle and Late Woodland Period sites of the Colington Phase in the state of North Carolina. It is located north of Poplar Branch in Currituck County, North Carolina. This phase, marked by cultures of the Algonkian peoples, aligns with the Late Woodland period in North Carolina, occurring during English explorations between 1584 and 1587, and permanent settlement at 1650.[2] This village is what the first English explorers encountered when entering the coastal region. The site contained ossuaries and evidence for a coastal village adaptation. The site was registered with the National Register of Historic Places on December 8, 1982, after testing and excavations in 1972 and 1973 by David Sutton Phelps, who was an archaeologist at East Carolina University. The site is suffering from erosion due to wave action. After the initial discovery, which was the result of erosion uncovering of remains, Phelps claimed, “this will provide the first glimpse of a coastal village of this type in the state”.[3] A residential subdivision, Currituck Crossing, is now located on the Baum site. https://web.archive.org/web/20160617035403/http://co.currituck.nc.us/pdf/board-of-commissioners-minutes-2013/boc-minutes-13nov04.pdf.

Geography

[edit]

The site is 5 acres of Norfolk loamy fine sand, found north of Poplar Branch, a small town in North Carolina. Currituck Sound, a canal, and a farm pond surround it. The Baum site has a rolling topography with two ridges, one running parallel to the coast.[4]

Excavations

[edit]

After a survey in the mid-1950s of Currituck County, East Carolina University conducted a study of the area known as the Baum Site after reports of exposed bone along the beach.[5] During this early excavation, the focus was mainly on developing a basic stratigraphy and context. Milford Baum, whom the site is named after, allowed Phelps and colleagues to conduct research on the area since the already found remains showed significant evidence of Algonkian and Woodland occupation. An ossuary was found, known as Burial 1, which had the remains of 58 individuals, several of which were articulated.[6] Although there was another burial found first, Feature 1, it only contained traces of a pit, which did not warrant an excavation. Many of the remains were well preserved due to the presence of oyster shells, which acted as acid-neutralizing agents in the soil.[3] The excellent preservation allowed Phelps and his team to make numerous interpretations regarding dating, culture, and modes of subsistence.

In 1980, another survey was conducted when another burial was found, due to erosion. This burial, known as Burial 5 ossuary, contained around 30 individuals, with one of the individuals being in an upper pit.[7] These findings confirm a presence of Native Americans during the Colington Phase.

The site had been regarded as a very important shell midden site in the state of North Carolina for decades. It has been used for research and investigation several times, including in 2005, when archaeologists from the Office of State Archaeology found remains that were uncovered by erosion at the bluff area of the site.[8]

Coastal Carolina Research, Inc. conducted another investigation in 2006 “…in response to a planned development. Limited testing concluded…the development was the fringe of the village. The area was subsequently mitigated through data recovery”.[3]

Artifacts and Interpretations

[edit]

The ossuaries present at the shell midden site provide important information about Woodland period material culture. Permanent village life is thought to have originated during the Colington Phase locally.

According to the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology, many ceramics, blades, shellfish remains, and other projectile points were recovered from the site. Copper beads and a marginella shell necklace were also found to be linked with the ossuaries.[3] It can be interpreted that the Algonkian Indians who inhabited the Baum site relied heavily on oysters and other marine resources for survival. In Burial 5, the only intentionally deposited artifact was a marginella shell necklace and a disc-shaped copper bead.[9]

During this time period, agriculture was an important source for survival. In the village, corn was a staple, as well as the cultivation of beans and squash. John Noakes and Betty Lee Brandau were able to use radiocarbon dating in order to provide a time of existence of the Woodland Indians. They found that, “Charred juncus grass fragments of woven grass mat upon which lay a cremated burial…[which] partly intruded into an ossuary…Both date from the late Algonkian occupation of the site”.[10] The dating for these artifacts was A.D. 1590 with an error of +/- 65 years. According to the same article, oysters and ceramics from the Baum site were also dated at A.D. 635 with an error of +/- 70 years, a much different date than the burial and grass mat.[10] Based on the cultural pattern, resembling the Algonkian culture, the 3 burials found seem to suggest the first evidence of ‘cemetery areas’.[11] Methods such as these are key for archaeologists and scholars who are attempting to better understand the history of a site.

Problems

[edit]

Erosion from sea level rising and storms was and continues to be a continual, destructive process on coastal sites, such as Baum. Archaeologists also face difficult issues with time and funding. For example, Burial 1 was discovered in 1973 but was not excavated until 1974, when sufficient resources were available to proceed.[12]

[edit]
  1. Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site by David Sutton Phelps
  2. Southeastern Prehistory Woodland Period
  3. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
  4. The Carolina Algonkians
  5. Picture of Milford Baum with Anthropologists at Indian Burial Site
  6. Rethinking Taxonomies: Skeletal Variation on the North Carolina Coastal Plain
  7. Southeastern Prehistory - Woodland Period
  8. The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia
  9. Picture of Native American Burial at Baum Site

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. July 9, 2010.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.6.
  • ^ a b c d Indian Burial Site Uncovered in Currituck, Ablemarle Life, 1973.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.4
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.2.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.5.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.8.
  • ^ James, Jr., Stephen R. and Andrew D. W. Lydecker, Phase I Terrestrial and Underwater Archaeological Background Study, Mid-Currituck Bridge Study, Currituck and Dare Counties, North Carolina, 2009, Panamerican Consultants, Inc., 2009, p. 28.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.11.
  • ^ a b Noakes, John E. and Betty Lee Brandau, University of Georgia Radiocarbon V, Radiocarbon, Vol. 18:3, 1976, p.369.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.14.
  • ^ Phelps, David Sutton, Archaeological Salvage of an Ossuary at the Baum Site, East Carolina University, 1980, p.4.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baum_Site&oldid=1168889049"

    Categories: 
    Archaeological sites on the National Register of Historic Places in North Carolina
    Woodland period
    National Register of Historic Places in Currituck County, North Carolina
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles using NRISref without a reference number
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Use mdy dates from August 2023
    Short description is different from Wikidata
     



    This page was last edited on 5 August 2023, at 18:25 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki