Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Background  





2 Legislative history  



2.1  Manila paper backlash  





2.2  Expiration and extension  







3 Provisions  





4 Implementation  



4.1  NBI summons Mayor Sotto  





4.2  NBI investigates Senator Pimentel III  







5 See also  





6 References  














Bayanihan to Heal as One Act







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
Wikisource
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Bayanihan to Heal as One Act
Congress of the Philippines
  • An Act Declaring the Existence of a National Emergency Arising from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation and a National Policy in Connection Therewith, and Authorizing the President of the Republic of the Philippines for a Limited Period and Subject to Restrictions, to Exercise Powers Necessary and Proper to Carry Out the Declared National Policy and for Other Purposes
CitationRepublic Act No. 11469
Territorial extentPhilippines
Passed bySenate of the Philippines
PassedMarch 23, 2020
Passed byHouse of Representatives of the Philippines
PassedMarch 23, 2020
Signed byRodrigo Duterte
SignedMarch 24, 2020
EffectiveMarch 25, 2020
Date of expiryJune 24, 2020
Legislative history
First chamber: Senate of the Philippines
Bill titleBayanihan To Heal As One Act
Bill citationSenate Bill No. 1418
Introduced byTito Sotto, Pia Cayetano, Win Gatchalian, et al.
IntroducedMarch 23, 2020
First readingMarch 23, 2020
Second readingMarch 23, 2020
Third readingMarch 23, 2020
Committee reportCommittee Report No. 70
Second chamber: House of Representatives of the Philippines
Bill titleWe Heal As One Act of 2020
Bill citationHouse Bill No. 6616
Received from the Senate of the PhilippinesMarch 23, 2020
Member(s) in chargeAlan Peter Cayetano (Pateros–Taguig), et al.
First readingMarch 23, 2020
Second readingMarch 23, 2020
Third readingMarch 23, 2020
Status: Expired

The Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, also known as the Bayanihan Act,[1] and officially designated as Republic Act No. 11469, is a law in the Philippines that was enacted in March 2020 granting the President additional authority to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.[2] The word "bayanihan" is a Tagalog word for communal work.

Background[edit]

Following the sharp increase of COVID-19 cases in the country, Congress held a special session on March 23 to deliberate and pass the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act. The act would allow President Duterte to "reallocate, realign, and reprogram" a budget of almost ₱275 billion ($5.37 billion) from the estimated ₱438 billion ($8.55 billion) national budget approved for 2020, in response to the pandemic;[3] enable him to "temporarily take over or direct the operations" of public utilities and privately owned health facilities and other necessary facilities "when the public interest so requires" for quarantine, the accommodation of health professionals, and the distribution and storage of medical relief; and "facilitate and streamline" the accreditation of testing kits.[4]

Legislative history[edit]

Senators during a special session to tackle the passage of the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, March 23, 2020

In the House of Representatives, the bill was introduced as House Bill No. 6616 with House Speaker Alan Peter CayetanoofPateros–Taguig as its principal sponsor and was defended on the floor by Deputy Speaker Luis Raymund VillafuerteofCamarines Sur's 2nd district. Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea addressed the session, stressing that the president needed "standby powers" to address the emergency.[5] Some representatives questioned the nature, usage, and necessity of the "standby powers", claiming its susceptibility to abuse and corruption.[6]

In the Senate of the Philippines, the bill was introduced as Senate Bill No. 1418 with Senate President Tito Sotto and Senator Pia Cayetano as its principal sponsors. Under the bill, Senator Cayetano said that over 18 million Filipino households living below the poverty line would also receive financial incentives of around ₱5,000–8,000 ($97.45–155.92) per month for two months.[7] Senators amended their version of the bill to include financial compensation of around ₱100,000 ($1,965.33) to be given by PhilHealth to health professionals who contracted the virus, as well as the provision of around ₱1 million-worth ($19,653.27) of financial aid to their families.[8]

Both versions of the bill reportedly removed the usage of the term "emergency powers", replacing it with "authority". It also removed the term "take over of public utilities and private businesses", limiting President Duterte's abilities at most to "direct the operations" of such enterprises.[9] The House version of the bill passed the House of Representatives in a 284–9 vote without abstentions,[10] while its Senate version unanimously passed the Senate.[11] President Duterte signed the bill into law the following day on March 24, 2020.[12][2]

Manila paper backlash[edit]

At the start of the special session at the House of Representatives, House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano along with his fellow congresspeople, did a photo op showing Cayetano and Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea holding up a board covered with Manila paper with the message, "Together with doctors and frontliners, we went to work for you, so please stay home for us."[13] This prompted an online backlash on social media with citizens criticizing the lawmakers for comparing themselves with the pandemic healthcare frontliners.[14] The photo also became fodder for memes with people replacing the Manila paper message with various images.[15][16] Cayetano responded to the backlash saying, "If you ask me to hold up a sign again, and even if the sign curses at me but it gets people to read and gets people to stay home, I will do it again and again and again."[17][18]

Expiration and extension[edit]

The law expired on June 24, 2020, without a resolution of it being extended. Although there were bills passed in Congress to extend the law until September 2020, the president did not certify these as urgent, prompting the bills to lapse.[19][20][21]

The distribution of the social amelioration program (SAP) and other cash aids from the Philippine government were not affected by the expiration of the law.[19]

The Bayanihan to Recover as One Bill, was filed on June 1, 2020.[22]

Provisions[edit]

The law provides the President of the Philippines the power to implement temporary emergency measures to respond to the crisis brought about by COVID-19, such as:[2]

The President of the Philippines shall submit a weekly report to Congress, every Monday, of all acts done for this law including the amount and corresponding utilization of funds. The Congress shall form a Joint Congressional Oversight Committee consisting of four members each from the Senate and the House of Representatives who are appointed by the Senate President and the House Speaker.[2]

Under this law, a penalty of two months imprisonment or a fine of not less than ten thousand pesos (₱10,000.00) but not more than one million pesos (₱1,000,000.00) or both shall be meted to offenses such as:[2]

Implementation[edit]

NBI summons Mayor Sotto[edit]

After the imposition of the enhanced community quarantine in Luzon and before the enactment of the Bayanihan law, Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto allowed temporarily the limited operation of the city's tricycles for use of health care workers, government personnel and patients despite the national government's ban on the operation of public transportation. Sotto mentioned that banning all tricycles in the city would bring more risk to the city's health situation.[23] After he aired the views and experiences of the local government of Pasig, Sotto complied with the inclusion of tricycles in the public transportation ban.[24]

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), through its Deputy Director Ferdinand Lavin, confirmed on April 1, 2020, that NBI sent an invitation letter to Sotto for violation of Bayanihan to Heal as One Act. Lavin said that Sotto is scheduled to appear at the bureau on April 7, 2020, at 10 am. Sotto responded by saying that he had already complied with the national government's order to stop tricycle operations prior to the implementation of the law.[25][26] Senate President Tito Sotto, an uncle of the mayor, criticized the move in a tweet, stating "NBI will be well advised to be cautious in their interpretation of the law I principally authored. Any so-called violation of RA 11469 can't be retroactive!".[27] Liberal Party president and Senator Francis Pangilinan also questioned the NBI's actions, stating the unconstitutionality of criminalizing an act committed before the law was passed.[citation needed]

Social media responded heavily with criticism towards the NBI for allegedly singling out the mayor, even comparing the situation to that of Senator Koko Pimentel's case, who had violated quarantine protocols a few days prior at the Makati Medical Center, but was given consideration by the government.[28]

NBI investigates Senator Pimentel III[edit]

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) spokesperson Deputy Director Ferdinand Lavin said that the bureau was also investigating Senator Aquilino Pimentel III for alleged violation of the Bayanihan Heal as One Act. Director Eric Distor of the NBI confirmed that Pimentel would also be invited to the bureau to explain. He would be summoned when his self-quarantine ended.[29][30][31]

Pimentel had undergone testing for COVID-19 and was informed that he was positive for the disease while he was at the Makati Medical Center, accompanying his pregnant wife who was scheduled to give birth.[29]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Patag, Kristine Joy (March 25, 2020). "During state of emergency, 'Bayanihan' Act allows imprisonment for 'false information'". The Philippine Star. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
  • ^ a b c d e "Republic Act No. 11469 – An Act Declaring the Existence of a National Emergency Arising from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Situation and a National Policy in Connection Therewith, and Authorizing the President of the Republic of the Philippines for a Limited Period and Subject to Resctrictions, to Exercise Powers Necessary and Proper to Carry Out the Declared National Policy and for Other Purposes" (PDF). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
  • ^ Parrocha, Azer (March 22, 2020). "Duterte seeks 'more powers,' urgent measures vs. Covid-19". Philippine News Agency. Philippine News Agency. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
  • ^ Luci-Atienza, Charissa (March 24, 2020). "House approves 'Bayanihan' bill on 3rd reading in historic virtual special session; grants PRRD 'necessary' powers to handle COVID-19 crisis". Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on April 11, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Romero, Paolo; Porcalla, Delon (March 23, 2020). "Congress grants Duterte covid standby powers". The Philippine Star. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Luci-Atienza, Charissa (March 24, 2020). "9 solons voted against Bayanihan Act; say special powers prone to abuse, misuse". Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on March 24, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Ager, Maila (March 24, 2020). "Poor families to get up to P8,000 cash subsidy from COVID-19 bill". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ "Senators seek ₱1-M death benefit; ₱100K aid for COVID-infected health workers". CNN Philippines. March 24, 2020. Archived from the original on March 24, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Navallo, Mike (March 24, 2020). "COVID-19 CRISIS: How President Duterte's emergency powers bill morphed in 36 hours". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Mercado, Neil Arwin (March 24, 2020). "House OKs bill granting Duterte 'necessary' powers due to COVID-19 crisis". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Ramos, Christia Marie; Lalu, Gabriel Palico (March 24, 2020). "Senate OKs bill granting Duterte special powers to fight COVID-19". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  • ^ Valente, Catherine (March 25, 2020). "Duterte signs measure on special powers into law". The Manila Times. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
  • ^ Mercado, Neil Arwin (March 23, 2020). "House special session photo op: 'We went to work for you, so please stay home for us'". Inquirer News. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ Cepeda, Mara (March 23, 2020). "Pinoys online livid over 'Stay at home for us' gimmick in House". Rappler. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ Merez, Arianne (March 23, 2020). "'We went to work for you': Gov't officials call to Filipinos to stay at home earns backlash". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ Aguilera, John Paulo (March 24, 2020). "These 'stay home for us' memes should serve as lesson for House not to use Manila paper". SPIN.ph. Sports Interactive Network Philippines. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ Cepeda, Mara (March 24, 2020). "Cayetano lashes out: 'If holding up sign gets people to stay home, I will do it again'". Rappler. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ "'I will do it again': Cayetano defends 'stay at home' sign amid online backlash". CNN Philippines. March 24, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2020.
  • ^ a b "Roque says expiration of Bayanihan Act will not affect the disbursement of SAP". CNN Philippines. June 25, 2020. Archived from the original on June 26, 2020. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  • ^ Punzalan, Jamaine (June 24, 2020). "Philippines 'in good shape' ahead of Bayanihan Act expiration, says Duterte spokesman". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  • ^ "Duterte may still need Bayanihan 2 – Palace". The Philippine Star. June 26, 2020. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  • ^ "BAYANIHAN TO RECOVER AS ONE ACT". Senate.gov.ph. June 1, 2020. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
  • ^ Nievera, Allysa (March 18, 2020). "Mayor Sotto says total ban on tricycles in Pasig adds risk to health situation". Manila Bulletin.[permanent dead link]
  • ^ "Vico Sotto: Pasig to follow nat'l gov't on tricycles ban". GMA News. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
  • ^ "NBI asks Vico Sotto to explain 'violation' of quarantine policy". CNN Philippines. Archived from the original on April 1, 2020. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
  • ^ "NBI summons Vico Sotto for 'violating' Bayanihan Law". Rappler. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  • ^ Rey, Aika. "Tito Sotto 'defends' Vico: 'Violation of Bayanihan law can't be retroactive'". Rappler. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
  • ^ Isinika, Alois. "#ProtectVico trends worldwide after NBI summons Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto". Rappler. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
  • ^ a b "NBI: Koko Pimentel also under probe for violation of COVID-19 rules". GMA News. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  • ^ "NBI to summon gov't execs over breach of quarantine rules". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  • ^ "NBI probes Koko Pimentel over possible quarantine breach". cnn. Archived from the original on April 1, 2020. Retrieved April 1, 2020.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bayanihan_to_Heal_as_One_Act&oldid=1202617214"

    Categories: 
    COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines
    Philippine legislation
    Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte
    Law associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
    Hidden categories: 
    Pages with non-numeric formatnum arguments
    All articles with dead external links
    Articles with dead external links from February 2024
    Articles with permanently dead external links
    Use mdy dates from June 2020
    Use Philippine English from November 2022
    All Wikipedia articles written in Philippine English
    Wikipedia articles that are excessively detailed from April 2020
    All articles that are excessively detailed
    Wikipedia articles with style issues from April 2020
    All articles with style issues
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from August 2021
     



    This page was last edited on 3 February 2024, at 04:27 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki