Contents

Blue-listed

The concept of a Blue List was derived in 1971 by Robert Arbib from the National Audubon Society in his article, "Announcing-- The Blue List: an 'early warning' system for birds". The article stated that the list was made up for species that appear to be locally common in North America, but is undergoing non-cyclic declines.^[1] Starting from 1971, it was utilized to list vulnerable bird species throughout North America. Unlike the US Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species List, the Blue List was made to identify patterns of population losses for regional bird populations before they could be listed as endangered.^[2] Every decade after its release, the list is revisited and revised based on regional editors and species get "nominated" to be added to the list. From then on, species that are part of the Blue List were referred to as Blue-listed species.

Initially, in order to identify the types of risks that each Blue-Listed species have, the Blue List has identified various categories for Blue-Listed species based on the following alphabets:^[3]

"A" : the species population is "greatly down in numbers"

"B" : the species population is "down in numbers"

"C" : the species population is experiencing no change

"D" : the species population is "up in numbers"

"E" : the species population is "greatly up in numbers"

Using this metric reginal editors were able to report on the species along with their status ranks in order to identify the patterns of population growth that each species is facing. Later on, the Government of British Columbia has revised the status ranks such that Blue-Listed species are listed based on the following modifier codes^[4]:

• Biodiversity Action Plan
• Red-listed

• British Columbia

This ecology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.