Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Analysis  





2 See also  





3 References  





4 External links  














Catchiness







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Catchiness is how easy it is for a song, tune, or phrase to be recalled. It is often taken into account when writing songs, catchphrases, advertising slogans, jingles etc. Alternatively, it can be defined as how difficult it is for one to forget it. Songs that embody high levels of remembrance or catchiness are literally known as "catchy songs" or "earworms".[1] While it is hard to scientifically explain what makes a song catchy, there are many documented techniques that recur throughout catchy music, such as repetition, hooks and alliteration. Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music says that "although there was no definition for what made a song catchy, all the songwriting guides agreed that simplicity and familiarity were vital".[2]

The physical symptoms of listening to a catchy song include "running [it] over in our heads or tapping a foot".[3] According to Todd Tremlin, catchy music "spread[s] because [it] resonates similarly from one mind to the next".[4]

Analysis

[edit]

In an article written by psychologist Tom Stafford for BBC, the psychology of "earworms" (catchy songs) is discussed. These songs are referred to as earworms due to their parasitic characteristics; their entrance and exit from our mind cannot be controlled and despite our best efforts they may refuse to leave. In that aspect, catchiness, depending on how digestible the music is to the listener, has a level of annoyance unlike anything else. In this article Stafford reviews the work of neurologist Oliver Sacks and the conclusion by Sacks that this catchiness is due to the inherent repetitiveness of popular music, which can affect our ability to remember a song. It is concluded that since memory is powerfully affected by repetition that this could be a significant contributing factor to catchiness, though certainly not the only aspect. A song's catchiness may also be due to the auditory "slave system" of our inner ear, much like the visual slave system of our "mind's eye."[5]

Often, a song with few qualities can still become immensely popular due to its catchiness. According to T.C.W. Blanning: "I would sacrifice everything – rhyme, reason, sense, and sentiment to catchiness. There is... a very great art in making rubbish acceptable".[6]ABillboard review explains that "any lack of originality (in the album The Remote Part) is more than made up for by the... catchiness of the musical arrangement"[7]

For example, the 2011 song "Call Me Maybe" by Carly Rae Jepsen has been identified as a catchy song. An article by ABC News listed some of its "catchiness factors." The article explains that it has a chorus which is『melodically easy on the ear, simple enough to stay in your head all day, and is topically appealing to Jepsen’s target pop demographic.』It also briefly describes the concept of musical incongruity and its use within the song. In music, incongruity refers to the inclusion of varied or irregular musical and lyrical features, such as mispronounced words or unexpected syllable accentuation. These incongruities are intended to capture the listener's attention and to preserve their level of interest throughout the song, regardless of the simple and otherwise repetitive lyrical content. Songwriter/producer Eve Nelson was quoted saying,『a five-year-old could probably sing this, because it’s just so easy.』As well as having lyrical hooks, the music itself can also be considered a hook.[8]

Musicologist Dr. Alison Pawley and psychologist Dr. Daniel Mullensiefen identified the following as factors of a song to incite singing along:

  1. Longer and detailed musical phrases.
  2. Higher number of pitches in the chorus hook.
  3. Male vocalists
  4. Higher male voices with noticeable vocal effort

Based on these factors, the researchers listed "We Are the Champions" by the British rock band Queen as the number one "sing-along song" in the UK.[9]

A 2014 study by the University of Amsterdam and the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester found "Wannabe" by the Spice Girls to be the catchiest pop song of the last 60 years in the UK.[10] The study found that having a simple and relentless melody was the key to a song being "catchy". "We found, much to our surprise, that writing a very surprising and unusual hook is not the recipe for long term memorability,” musicologist Dr John Ashley Burgoyne explained. "Actually, the more conventional your melody in terms of the interval patterns that you use; in terms of the rhythms that you use, the easier the song is to remember over the long term. What makes Wannabe work so well is that it isn’t a difficult song to sing, it has a conventional melody that repeats itself a lot, and it’s just relentless."[11]

Additionally, the book FutureHit DNA by Jay Frank says "Wannabe felt like it should have been a 3+12- to 4-minute pop song, just like every other hit at that time. To create that feeling, the producers cut the song at the knees. The last thing heard in the song is the a cappella line, “If you wannabe my lover,” which is also the first lyric of the chorus. The audience has a natural desire to hear something to its completion. When they expect a song to go somewhere, they will not feel completely settled until that song resolves itself. “Wannabe” never resolves, and therefore creates a situation where the listener cannot get the song out of his head."[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Earworm". Dictionary (definition) (online ed.). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 6 May 2013.
  • ^ Suisman, David (7 May 2012), Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music, Harvard University Press, p. 49, ISBN 9780674054684.
  • ^ Bogost, Ian (5 August 2011). How to Do Things with Videogames. U of Minnesota Press. p. 133. ISBN 9781452933122. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
  • ^ Tremlin, Todd (February 2006). Minds and Gods:The Cognitive Foundations of Religion. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 195. ISBN 9780199885466. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
  • ^ Stafford, Tom (April 11, 2012). "Earworms: Why catchy tunes get trapped in our heads". BBC News. Retrieved May 10, 2013.
  • ^ Blanning, TCW (2008). The Triumph of Music: The Rise of Composers, Musicians and Their Art. Harvard University Press. p. 164. ISBN 9780674031043. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
  • ^ Billboard. April 5, 2003. p. 37. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
  • ^ Sher, Lauren (June 22, 2012). "Why 'Call Me Maybe' Is So Catchy". ABC News. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
  • ^ Puiu, Tibi (3 October 2011). "What makes a song 'catchy' – science explains". ZME Science. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  • ^ "'Wannabe' by the Spice Girls Is the Catchiest Song, Study Says". Time. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
  • ^ "Why Spice Girls' Wannabe is the catchiest song of all time". BBC. 8 July 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
  • ^ Frank, Jay. Futurehit.DNA.
  • [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catchiness&oldid=1232447696"

    Categories: 
    Musical terminology
    Music cognition
    Musicology
    Popular music
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
     



    This page was last edited on 3 July 2024, at 19:51 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki