This category is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Suggestion: Tie this to human resources management somehow. (I'm still not fluent in Wikipedia terminology so I may be talking about merging or something else.) In the US especially, the term human resources is much more widespread in popular society. Sonria19:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Human resources" is "much more widespread", if at all, only among certain management groups. It is not by any means more widespread than "labor" among legal professions, workers, or many other categories. Please see, for example, Labor law. --Lquilter (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I remove labor capitalism and marxian economic cats.
Because the labor isn't a business and because labor is not necessarily linked to capitalism and to marxian economics. If you want, you can give your opinion. Zipodu (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]