Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Philosophical excerpts  





2 Coptic attitudes to philosophy  





3 Later works by Copts  





4 See also  





5 Notes  





6 Bibliography  





7 External links  














Coptic philosophy







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


There are no original works of philosophy in the Coptic language.[1] All surviving philosophical passages in Coptic are of Greek origin and many are anonymous.[1] Mostly they deal with ethics and are treated like wisdom literature.[1] Only a few texts have been edited and published.[1]

Philosophical excerpts

[edit]

Among the named philosophers quoted in Coptic are Diogenes, Plato, Dios and the probably legendary Anacharsis.[1][2][3] A translation of an excerpt from Plato's Republic (588A–589B) has been found in the Nag Hammadi library, but it is a poor translation, extensively reworked to better conform with Gnostic teaching.[1][4] Many leaves of a Coptic manuscript consisting of philosophical texts, fables with Christian interpretations and explicitly Christian texts survive dispersed between libraries in Vienna and London.[4] The parchment manuscript was copied in the 10th or 11th century in the White Monastery. The section of philosophy is titled "Notes of Some Philosophers".[5] Anthony Alcock supposes that it was compiled in Akhmim, a centre of Greek learning into the 6th century and also a late redoubt of Egyptian paganism.[4] One of the anonymous sayings from the Vienna fragments that cannot be identified with any Greek text is this:

It is better to do good to a dog and a lion than to feed a thankless person. When the dog and the lion become tame, they remain friends of those who feed them. The disorderly person not only does not remain a friend but you will find that when you are doing him a favour, he is trying to rob your house and deliver you into the hands of your enemies.[4]

Six anonymous sayings found in the Vienna fragments K 944, 945 and 946 are also found in the Homily on the Passion and ResurrectionofPseudo-Evodius, where they are called "wisdom that is outside" (i.e., of the Bible).[6]

Although many writings of the Church Fathers contain extensive philosophizing, few of these are known to have been translated into Coptic.[1] The most notable is Gregory of Nyssa's De anima et resurrectione, a piece of philosophical theology that includes references to Plato's Phaedrus.[1] The native Coptic saint Shenoute also references Plato in his writings.[1]

Coptic attitudes to philosophy

[edit]

Conflicting Coptic attitudes to Greek philosophy are apparent in several sources.[7] Some philosophy, or at least Plato, seems to have been a standard part of a Coptic education in the first centuries AD.[4] Socrates of Constantinople records that when the Greek monk Evagrius Ponticus went to the Coptic monastic complex of Kellia in Egypt, he spent fourteen years as a calligrapher learning the Coptic language. He became a disciple of Macarius of Egypt and Macarius of Alexandria, "acquiring from them the philosophy of deeds whereas before he only knew the philosophy of words".[7] In this passage, Socrates uses "philosophy" in its original sense (love of wisdom), even citing the definition of philosophy in Plato's Phaedo, i.e., the "practice of dying".[7] The Coptic letters of Anthony the Great (died 356) treat the quest of philosophy and Christianity as the same (wisdom), but the hagiographic Life of Anthony portrays its subject as an implacable foe of the philosophers.[8]

Later works by Copts

[edit]

Some later Copts wrote philosophy or philosophical theology in Arabic. The Kitāb al-Burhān, written by Ibn al-Rāhib in 1270–71, combines theology, ethics and philosophy. It contains a theodicy based on that of the Islamic theologian Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī.[9]

In modern times, and especially with the strong French and British influence during the colonial period, there was a resurgence of Coptic philosophical writing. Two notable examples of modern Coptic philosophers are Bishop Gregorius (General Bishop of Higher Studies)[10] and Zakariyya Ibrahim.[11]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Kuhn (1991).
  • ^ Burns 2023, p. 34.
  • ^ Bull 2023, p. 341.
  • ^ a b c d e Alcock (n.d.).
  • ^ Burns 2023, pp. 33–34.
  • ^ Burns 2023, pp. 33–35.
  • ^ a b c Corrigan 2009, p. 5.
  • ^ Rubenson 1995, p. 187.
  • ^ Sidarus 2004.
  • ^ "Bishop Gregorius (1919–2001)". Archive of Contemporary Coptic Orthodox Theology. St Cyril's Coptic Orthodox Theological College. Archived from the original on 2021-02-26.
  • ^ "Zakaria Ibrahim (1924–1976)". Archive of Contemporary Coptic Orthodox Theology. St Cyril's Cotpic Orthodox Theological College. Archived from the original on 2021-02-23.
  • Bibliography

    [edit]
    [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coptic_philosophy&oldid=1230589085"

    Categories: 
    Ancient Egyptian philosophy
    Early Christianity and Gnosticism
    Coptic literature
    Christian philosophy
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description with empty Wikidata description
     



    This page was last edited on 23 June 2024, at 15:56 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki