| Examining Board v. Flores de Otero | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argued December 8, 1975 Decided June 17, 1976 | |
| Full case name | Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors et al. v. Flores de Otero |
| Citations | 426 U.S. 572 (more) 96 S. Ct. 2264; 49 L. Ed. 2d65 |
| Holding | |
| State law that excluded aliens from the practice of civil engineering was declared unconstitutional on the basis of the Equal Protection Clause. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Blackmun, joined by Burger, White, Powell, O'Connor, Brennan, Stewart |
| Dissent | Rehnquist |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
Examining Board v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated a state law that excluded aliens from the practice of civil engineering. The Court invalidated the law on the basis of equal protection using a strict scrutiny standard of review.[1][2]
APuerto Rico law permits only United States citizens to practice privately as civil engineers. Appellees are alien civil engineers residing in Puerto Rico, one of whom (Flores de Otero) was denied a license under this law, and the other of whom (Perez Nogueiro) was granted only a conditional license to work for the Commonwealth. Each appellee brought suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against appellant Examining Board and its members in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, claiming jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and alleging that the statute's citizenship requirement violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
