The book describes the 2017 detection of ʻOumuamua, the first known interstellar object to pass through the Solar System.[8][9] Loeb, an astronomer at Harvard University, speculates that the object might be an extraterrestrial artifact,[10] a suggestion considered unlikely by the scientific community collectively.[11][12][13][14] Earlier, Loeb claimed to have demonstrated that the interstellar object was not an asteroid, was moving too fast in a very unusual orbit and left no gas trail or debris in its path to be a comet.[15][16] Loeb believes, due to the observed acceleration of the object near the Sun, that ʻOumuamua may be a thin disk that acts as a solar sail.[2] Further, Loeb and colleagues demonstrated that the object is unlikely to be frozen hydrogen, as proposed by other researchers.[17][better source needed][18]
The only way to make sense of ʻOumuamua’s strange acceleration, without resorting to some sort of undetectable outgassing, is to assume that the object was propelled by solar radiation—essentially, photons bouncing off its surface. And the only way the object could be propelled by solar radiation is if it were extremely thin—no thicker than a millimetre—with a very low density and a comparatively large surface area. Such an object would function as a sail—one powered by light, rather than by wind. The natural world doesn’t produce sails; people do. ... Loeb writes, "ʻOumuamua must have been designed, built, and launched by an extraterrestrial intelligence."
Besides ʻOumuamua, another interstellar object, the comet2I/Borisov, has been detected passing through the Solar System. In comparison, 2I/Borisov has been found to be natural, whereas ʻOumuamua has not been so determined.[2] The possibility that ʻOumuamua may be alien technology has not been ruled out, although such an explanation is considered unlikely by most scientists.[8] Nonetheless, according to Loeb, "We should be open-minded and search for evidence rather than assume that everything we see in the sky must be rocks."[20][21]
Alan Lightman writes the book is "provocative and thrilling," and commends Loeb for suggesting that readers "think big and to expect the unexpected."[1]Jeff Foust, editor and publisher of The Space Review, comments that Loeb "fails to close the case that the object must be artificial ... Just because something can’t be immediately explained by natural phenomena doesn't mean it’s not natural". Further, "Perhaps ʻOumuamua will turn out to be the first of many in a new class of interstellar objects with an unusual, but natural, origin. Or, maybe, it will be like the “Wow!” signal, which was never seen again and its source never identified; mysterious, but not necessarily alien".[22]Dennis Overbye, science writer for The New York Times, notes that the book is, "part graceful memoir and part plea for keeping an open mind about the possibilities of what is out there in the universe — in particular, life. Otherwise, he says, we might miss something amazing, like the church officials in the 17th century who refused to look through Galileo’s telescope."[23] Reviewing for The New Yorker, Elizabeth Kolbert writes, "It seems a good deal more likely that [the book] will be ranked with von Däniken's work than with Galileo's," but concedes "it's thrilling to imagine the possibilities."[19]
On August 24, 2023, The New York Times published an article about Loeb and his related search for signs of extraterrestrial life and his related publications.[24]
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Science
Technology
