Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Controversial aspects  





2 Fine print on TV and other video media  



2.1  Verbal fine print  







3 Fighting fine print  



3.1  Credit cards  





3.2  Rebates  





3.3  Banking  







4 See also  





5 References  



5.1  Further reading  







6 External links  














Fine print







Български
Ελληνικά
Español
Italiano
עברית
Português
Svenska
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve itbyverifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (September 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (August 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
U.S. political endorsement signs often have fine print disclaimers.

Fine print, small print, or mouseprint is less noticeable print smaller than the more obvious larger print it accompanies that advertises or otherwise describes or partially describes a commercial product or service.[1] The larger print that is used in conjunction with fine print by the merchant often has the effect of deceiving the consumer into believing the offer is more advantageous than it really is. This may satisfy a legal technicality which requires full disclosure of all (even unfavorable) terms or conditions, but does not specify the manner (size, typeface, coloring, etc.) of disclosure. There is strong evidence that suggests the fine print is not read by the majority of consumers.[2]

Fine print may say the opposite of what the larger print says. For example, if the larger print says "pre-approved" the fine print might say "subject to approval".[3] Especially in pharmaceutical advertisements, fine print may accompany a warning message, but this message is often neutralized by the more eye-catching positive images and pleasant background music (eye candy). Sometimes television advertisements flash text fine print in camouflagic colors, and for brief periods of time, making it difficult or impossible for the viewer to read.

The use of fine print is a common advertising technique in certain market niches, particularly those of high-margin specialty products or services uncompetitive with those in the mainstream market. The practice, for example, can be used to mislead the consumer about an item's price or value, or the nutritional content of a food product.[4]

In the US, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations state that, for an advertised offer to be lawful, the terms of the offer must be clear and conspicuous, not relegated to fine print.[5] US FTC regulations state that unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce are unlawful. (15 USC § 45 (a))[6] In relevant part, they state that contingent conditions and obligations of an offer must be set forth clearly and conspicuously at the outset of the offer, and that disclosure of the terms of the offer set forth in a footnote of an advertisement to which reference is made by an asterisk or other symbol placed next to the offer, is not regarded as making disclosure at the outset. (16 CFR 251.1)[5]

Controversial aspects[edit]

Globe icon.
The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (December 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This section may contain excessiveorirrelevant examples. Please help improve the article by adding descriptive text and removing less pertinent examples. (November 2019)

Fine print is controversial because of its deceptive nature. Its purpose is to make the consumer believe that the offer is really great. Though the real truth about the offer is technically available to the consumer in the smaller print of the advertisement—thus virtually ensuring plausible deniability from claims of fraud—it is often designed to be overlooked. The unsuspecting customer, who can instantly see all the attractive aspects of the offer, will, due to natural impulsive behavior, time constraints, and/or personal need, generally not bother to learn the caveats, instead focusing on the positives of the deal.[3]

Many offers advertised in large print only apply when certain conditions are met. In many cases, these conditions are difficult or nearly impossible to meet.

In many cases, the business states in fine print that it reserves the right to modify the terms of the contract at any time with little to no advance notice. This controversial practice is often seen in the banking and insurance industries.[citation needed] It is also widely abused in terms of use statements and privacy policies. However, in early 2009, the federal case of Harris v. Blockbuster Inc. ruled that these "unilateral modification clauses" were illusory and, thus, unenforceable.[7]

In some cases, the seller who uses this technique will engage in the practice of bait and switch. The customer will be told when ready to purchase that for one reason or another, they will not be eligible for the advertised offer, and will be coerced into one that is higher priced (see Hard sell). Reasons they may be given include his/her age, race, religion, credit rating, size or location of residence, the type of vehicle s/he owns, the amount of prior business s/he has done with that company, or the variety of the item s/he wishes to purchase. Often when this occurs, the limitations that render him/her ineligible will apply to an overwhelming majority of consumers.

Very frequently, consumers, eager to obtain a product or service they have the dire need or wish for, or that they have been coerced into obtaining, will sign their names on a binding contract. A court may find the consumer to be liable to the terms of the contract, although stated only by the fine print, and an exit from these terms may be costly or impossible.

Some examples of how consumers are deceived are as follows:

Fine print on TV and other video media[edit]

A common practice has been to use fine print in advertising on television. In such a case, the fine print is displayed at the bottom of the screen in a manner where it is not noticeable to many viewers, or is displayed for such a short time that no one has the time to read the entire paragraph without an artificial means of stopping the commercial, i.e. record it or freeze frame it, such as with a digital video recorder (DVR), in order to read it. The attention is drawn away from this little section by the more eye-catching or large print description of the offer, which alone is untrue.

Fine print is often illegible, e.g., when a TV picture is noisy, low-resolution, or the viewer's sight is impaired. Banking offers have been displayed on video billboards by highways that are unreadable by passing drivers.[11][better source needed]

Verbal fine print[edit]

Some TV and radio commercials are concluded with "fast talking", which is barely audible or comprehensible to most. While it is this very message that states all necessary disclaimers and exceptions to the advertisement, it is often stated too fast for the viewer or listener to comprehend. This is often coupled with pleasant background music and positive images, which in turn takes the consumer's focus off the disclaimer.

Fighting fine print[edit]

Many consumer advocates are active in lobbying for laws to limit the rights of an advertiser to use fine print to hide the truth, and to expand rights to consumers who fall victim to fine print. Due to free speech that is granted to advertisers, passing such laws in the United States has proven to be difficult.

Credit cards[edit]

Consumer advocates have widely criticized the credit card industry for its increasing ruthlessness in its practices, which allow the banks seemingly unlimited rights to charge whatever fees they wish, to rewrite the terms and conditions faced by the consumer at will, and to not be challenged by the consumer in their practices. The consumer who initially obtained the card was inevitably drawn by the large print, which was accompanied by pages of fine print few are likely to read in full or to understand. During the 1990s, two laws against such practices were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, and these rulings are said to have opened the floodgates for even more ruthless practices.[12]

Rebates[edit]

Several states have considered laws that would require retailers to provide advertised rebates to customers at the time of the purchase with no strings attached.[13] These laws have been widely opposed by corporations, and are yet to have passed in any states, except Connecticut and Rhode Island, where they are only allowed if unadvertised.[14]

Banking[edit]

Advertising by conventional banks is relatively highly regulated, requiring disclosures that generally are made, but appear in small print. In some cases, the minimum size of any small print is regulated, such as credit card advertising/application Schumer box disclosure requirements. One bank offered non-FDIC-insured CDs yielding 10% in letters almost 3″ high, while the small print 1/16″ high disclosed the lack of insurance.[15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Sullivan, Bob (September 26, 2006). "Web site 'outs' fine print - The Red Tape Chronicles". MSNBC. Archived from the original on January 13, 2008.
  • ^ Greenberg, Andy. "Who Reads The Fine Print Online? Less Than One Person In 1000". Forbes.
  • ^ a b AG filing against BlueHippo
  • ^ For example, see the Macy's ad image in this article[remove or clarification needed], which tends to mislead the consumer to think that a discount will be available and hence to shop at Macy's because of anticipated pricing that will likely turn out to be unavailable.
  • ^ a b "16 CFR 251.1 - The guide". www.gpo.gov.
  • ^ "15 U.S. Code § 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission". LII / Legal Information Institute.
  • ^ "Texas Court Rules that Internet Contract Giving Website Owner the Right to Make Unilateral Amendments Is Illusory". April 22, 2009. Archived from the original on 2010-12-22.
  • ^ "Secret History Of The Credit Card - Eight Things A Credit Card User Should Know - FRONTLINE - PBS". www.pbs.org.
  • ^ AG filing against TigerDirect
  • ^ "FTC Charges Online Marketing Scheme with Deceiving Shoppers". Federal Trade Commission. March 24, 2017.
  • ^ A CBS Outdoors digital billboard, located on the East Bay side of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, 59' x 19' with a resolution of 720 x 240 pixels, displayed a banking ad with small print on May 6, 2009.
  • ^ "The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act - Public Citizen". www.citizen.org.
  • ^ "NY State Senate Bill S6815". 3 October 2015.
  • ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2012-09-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  • ^ "Roundtable on Insurance Reform" (PDF). www.fdic.gov.
  • Further reading[edit]

    External links[edit]

    Scams and confidence tricks

    Terminology

  • Error account
  • Shill
  • Shyster
  • Sucker list
  • Notable scams and
    confidence tricks

  • 2G spectrum case
  • Advance-fee scam
  • Art student scam
  • Badger game
  • Bait-and-switch
  • Black money scam
  • Blessing scam
  • Bogus escrow
  • Boiler room
  • Bride scam
  • Charity fraud
  • Clip joint
  • Coin-matching game
  • Coin rolling scams
  • Drop swindle
  • Embarrassing cheque
  • Exit scam
  • Extraterrestrial real estate
  • Fiddle game
  • Fine print
  • Foreclosure rescue scheme
  • Foreign exchange fraud
  • Fortune telling fraud
  • Gem scam
  • Get-rich-quick scheme
  • Green goods scam
  • Hustling
  • Indian coal allocation scam
  • IRS impersonation scam
  • Intellectual property scams
  • Kansas City Shuffle
  • Locksmith scam
  • Long firm
  • Miracle cars scam
  • Mismarking
  • Mock auction
  • Moving scam
  • Overpayment scam
  • Patent safe
  • Pig in a poke
  • Pigeon drop
  • Pork barrel
  • Pump and dump
  • Redemption/A4V schemes
  • Reloading scam
  • Return fraud
  • Salting
  • Shell game
  • Sick baby hoax
  • SIM swap scam
  • Slavery reparations scam
  • Spanish Prisoner
  • SSA impersonation scam
  • SSC Scam
  • Strip search phone call scam
  • Swampland in Florida
  • Tarmac scam
  • Technical support scam
  • Telemarketing fraud
  • Thai tailor scam
  • Thai zig zag scam
  • Three-card monte
  • Trojan horse
  • Wash trading
  • White van speaker scam
  • Work-at-home scheme
  • Internet scams and
    countermeasures

  • Pig Butchering
  • Carding
  • Catfishing
  • Click fraud
  • Clickjacking
  • Cramming
  • Cryptocurrency scams
  • Cybercrime
  • CyberThrill
  • DarkMarket
  • Domain name scams
  • Email authentication
  • Email fraud
  • Internet vigilantism
  • Lenny anti-scam bot
  • Lottery scam
  • PayPai
  • Phishing
  • Referer spoofing
  • Ripoff Report
  • Rock Phish
  • Romance scam
  • Russian Business Network
  • SaferNet
  • Scam baiting
  • ShadowCrew
  • Spoofed URL
  • Spoofing attack
  • Stock Generation
  • Voice phishing
  • Website reputation ratings
  • Pyramid and
    Ponzi schemes

  • Bernard Cornfeld
  • Caritas
  • Dona Branca
  • Earl Jones
  • Ezubao
  • Foundation for New Era Philanthropy
  • Franchise fraud
  • High-yield investment program (HYIP)
  • Investors Overseas Service
  • Kapa investment scam
  • Kubus scheme
  • Madoff investment scandal
  • Make Money Fast
  • Matrix scheme
  • MMM
  • Petters Group Worldwide
  • Pyramid schemes in Albania
  • Reed Slatkin
  • Saradha Group financial scandal
  • Secret Sister
  • Scott W. Rothstein
  • Stanford Financial Group
  • Welsh Thrasher faith scam
  • Lists

  • Confidence tricks
  • Criminal enterprises, gangs and syndicates
  • Impostors
  • In the media
  • Ponzi schemes

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fine_print&oldid=1222120858"

    Categories: 
    Deception
    Business terms
    Advertising
    Ethically disputed business practices
    Hidden categories: 
    Wikipedia articles needing clarification from September 2020
    CS1 maint: archived copy as title
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Articles that may contain original research from September 2012
    All articles that may contain original research
    Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from August 2012
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes
    Articles with multiple maintenance issues
    Articles with limited geographic scope from December 2017
    Articles with too many examples from November 2019
    All articles with too many examples
    Wikipedia articles with style issues from November 2019
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008
    Articles with unsourced statements from January 2009
    All articles lacking reliable references
    Articles lacking reliable references from July 2011
    Articles with NKC identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 4 May 2024, at 00:41 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki