Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Features  





2 Considerations  





3 Asset allocation  



3.1  Target-date fund  







4 Private-equity funds  





5 Fund of hedge funds  





6 Fund of venture capital funds  





7 See also  





8 References  





9 External links  














Fund of funds






Deutsch
فارسی
Italiano
Lietuvių

Українська

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


A"fund of funds" (FOF) is an investment strategy of holding a portfolio of other investment funds rather than investing directly in stocks, bonds or other securities. This type of investing is often referred to as multi-manager investment. A fund of funds may be "fettered", meaning that it invests only in funds managed by the same investment company, or "unfettered", meaning that it can invest in external funds run by other managers.

There are different types of FOF, each investing in a different type of collective investment scheme (typically one type per FOF), for example a mutual fund FOF, a hedge fund FOF, a private-equity FOF, or an investment trust FOF.[1] The original Fund of Funds was created by Bernie Cornfeld in 1962. It went bankrupt after being looted by Robert Vesco.[2]

Features[edit]

Investing in a collective investment scheme may increase diversity compared with a small investor holding a smaller range of securities directly. Investing in a fund of funds may achieve greater diversification. According to modern portfolio theory, the benefit of diversification can be the reduction of volatility while maintaining average returns. However, this is countered by the increased fees paid both at FOF level and at the level of the underlying investment fund.

Considerations[edit]

Management fees for FOFs are typically higher than those on traditional investment funds because they include the management fees charged by the underlying funds.[3]

In its article on Funds of Funds, Investopedia notes that, "Historically, a fund of funds showed an expense figure that didn't always include the fees of the underlying funds. As of January 2007, the SEC began requiring that these fees be disclosed in a line called 'Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses' (AFFE)."[4][5]

After allocation of the levels of fees payable and taxation, returns on FOF investments will generally be lower than what single-manager funds can yield. However, some FOFs waive the second level of fees (the FOF fee) so that investors only pay the expenses of the underlying mutual funds.[6]

Pension funds, endowments and other institutions often invest in funds of hedge funds for part or all of their "alternative asset" programs, i.e., investments other than traditional stock and bond holdings.[citation needed]

The due diligence and safety of investing in FOFs has come under question as a result of the Bernie Madoff investment scandal, where many FOFs put substantial investments into the scheme. It became clear that a motivation for this was the lack of fees by Madoff, which gave the illusion that the FOF was performing well. The due diligence of the FOFs apparently did not include asking why Madoff was not making this charge for his services.[7] 2008 and 2009 saw FOFs take a battering from investors and the media on all fronts from the hollow promises made by over-eager marketers to the strength (or lack) of their due diligence processes to those carefully explained and eminently justifiable extra layers of fees, all reaching their zenith with the Bernie Madoff fiasco.[8]

These strategic and structural issues have caused fund-of-funds to become less and less popular. Nonetheless, fund-for-funds remain important in particular asset classes, including venture capital and for particular investors in order for them to be able to diversify their too low or too high level of assets under management appropriately.[9]

Asset allocation[edit]

The FOF structure may be useful for asset-allocation funds, that is, an "exchange-traded fund (ETF) of ETFs" or "mutual fund of mutual funds". For example, iShares has asset-allocation ETFs, which own other iShares ETFs.[10] Similarly, Vanguard has asset-allocation mutual funds, which own other Vanguard mutual funds. The "parent" funds may own the same "child" funds, with different proportions to allow for "aggressive" to "conservative" allocation. This structure simplifies management by separating allocation from security selection.

Target-date fund[edit]

A target-date fund is similar to an asset-allocation fund, except that the allocation is designed to change over time. The same structure is useful here. iShares has target-date ETFs that own other iShares ETFs; Vanguard has target-date mutual funds that own other Vanguard mutual funds. In both cases, the same funds are used as the asset-allocation funds. Since a provider may have many target dates, this can greatly reduce duplication of work.

Private-equity funds[edit]

According to Preqin (formerly known as Private Equity Intelligence), in 2006, funds investing in other private-equity funds (i.e., FOFs, including secondary funds) amounted to 14% of all committed capital in the private-equity market. The following ranking of private-equity FOF investment managers is based on information published by Preqin in 2020:[11]

Rank Name of the firm Assets under management
(billions of USD)
Headquarters
1 Partners Group 100 Switzerland Baar, Switzerland
2 Goldman Sachs AIMS PE 65 United States New York
3 Hamilton Lane 65 United States Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
4 HarbourVest Partners 63 United States Boston, Massachusetts
5 Pathway Capital Management 62 United States Irvine, California
6 Fort Washington Investment Advisors 52 United States Cincinnati, Ohio
7 Pantheon Ventures 47 United Kingdom London
8 AlpInvest Partners 42 United States New York
9 Adams Street Partners 40 United States Chicago, Illinois
10 Caixagest 39 Portugal Lisbon, Portugal

Fund of hedge funds[edit]

Afund of hedge funds is a fund of funds that invests in a portfolio of different hedge funds to provide broad exposure to the hedge fund industry and to diversify the risks associated with a single investment fund. Funds of hedge funds select hedge fund managers and construct portfolios based upon those selections. The fund of hedge funds is responsible for hiring and firing the managers in the fund. Some funds of hedge funds might have only one hedge fund in them, which lets ordinary investors into a highly acclaimed fund, or many hedge funds.

Funds of hedge funds generally charge a fee for their services, always in addition to the hedge fund's management and performance fees, which can be 1.5% and 15–30%, respectively. Fees can reduce an investor's profits and potentially reduce the total return below what could be achieved through a less expensive mutual fundorexchange-traded fund (ETF).

Fund of venture capital funds[edit]

Afund of venture capital funds is a fund of funds that invests in a portfolio of different venture capital funds for access to private capital markets. Clients are usually university endowments and pension funds.[12]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Definition of fund of funds". Financial Times Lexicon. Financial Times. 2015-03-08. Retrieved 2015-03-08.
  • ^ De Vries, M. F. R. "The entrepreneurial personality: a person at the crossroads." Journal of management studies 14.1 (1977): 34–57.
  • ^ "Complexity pays". The Economist. 27 November 2009.
  • ^ "Fund of Funds (FOF) Definition". Investopedia. Retrieved 2021-12-15.
  • ^ "Final Rule: Fund of Funds Investments" (PDF). sec.gov. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  • ^ Smith, David M (2010). "Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses". In Haslem, John A. (ed.). Mutual Funds: Portfolio Structures, Analysis, Management, and Stewardship. Wiley. pp. 51–74.
  • ^ "Madoff money". The Economist. 12 December 2008.
  • ^ Opalesque (28 August 2009). "Fund of funds take a public beating in post-Madoff era".
  • ^ "When Fund-Of-Funds for Venture Work". Alerion Ventures. 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2021-12-27.
  • ^ "iShares Adds Four Allocation ETFs to Core Lineup - Yahoo Finance". Yahoo! Finance.
  • ^ "FUND OF FUNDS PE VC CREDIT | 5Capital Advisors Placement Agent". 2023-06-06. Archived from the original on 2023-06-06. Retrieved 2023-08-19.
  • ^ TrueBridge (27 August 2009). "Market Analysis: State of the Venture Capital Industry".
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fund_of_funds&oldid=1202507186"

    Categories: 
    Investment management
    Investment funds
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Articles needing additional references from June 2008
    All articles needing additional references
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from November 2013
     



    This page was last edited on 2 February 2024, at 22:47 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki