Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Going up and going down  



1.1  Lying over and incomparability  





1.2  Going-up  





1.3  Going-down  







2 Going-up and going-down theorems  





3 References  














Going up and going down






Deutsch
Français
עברית

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Incommutative algebra, a branch of mathematics, going up and going down are terms which refer to certain properties of chainsofprime idealsinintegral extensions.

The phrase going up refers to the case when a chain can be extended by "upward inclusion", while going down refers to the case when a chain can be extended by "downward inclusion".

The major results are the Cohen–Seidenberg theorems, which were provedbyIrvin S. Cohen and Abraham Seidenberg. These are known as the going-up and going-down theorems.

Going up and going down

[edit]

Let A ⊆ B be an extension of commutative rings.

The going-up and going-down theorems give sufficient conditions for a chain of prime ideals in B, each member of which lies over members of a longer chain of prime ideals in A, to be able to be extended to the length of the chain of prime ideals in A.

Lying over and incomparability

[edit]

First, we fix some terminology. If and are prime idealsofA and B, respectively, such that

(note that is automatically a prime ideal of A) then we say that lies under and that lies over . In general, a ring extension A ⊆ Bofcommutative rings is said to satisfy the lying over property if every prime ideal ofA lies under some prime ideal of B.

The extension A ⊆ B is said to satisfy the incomparability property if whenever and are distinct primes of B lying over a prime inA, then  ⊈  and  ⊈ .

Going-up

[edit]

The ring extension A ⊆ B is said to satisfy the going-up property if whenever

is a chain of prime ideals of A and

is a chain of prime ideals of B with m < n and such that lies over for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, then the latter chain can be extended to a chain

such that lies over for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n.

In (Kaplansky 1970) it is shown that if an extension A ⊆ B satisfies the going-up property, then it also satisfies the lying-over property.

Going-down

[edit]

The ring extension A ⊆ B is said to satisfy the going-down property if whenever

is a chain of prime ideals of A and

is a chain of prime ideals of B with m < n and such that lies over for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, then the latter chain can be extended to a chain

such that lies over for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n.

There is a generalization of the ring extension case with ring morphisms. Let f : A → B be a (unital) ring homomorphism so that B is a ring extension of f(A). Then f is said to satisfy the going-up property if the going-up property holds for f(A) in B.

Similarly, if B is a ring extension of f(A), then f is said to satisfy the going-down property if the going-down property holds for f(A) in B.

In the case of ordinary ring extensions such as A ⊆ B, the inclusion map is the pertinent map.

Going-up and going-down theorems

[edit]

The usual statements of going-up and going-down theorems refer to a ring extension A ⊆ B:

  1. (Going up) If B is an integral extensionofA, then the extension satisfies the going-up property (and hence the lying over property), and the incomparability property.
  2. (Going down) If B is an integral extension of A, and B is a domain, and A is integrally closed in its field of fractions, then the extension (in addition to going-up, lying-over and incomparability) satisfies the going-down property.

There is another sufficient condition for the going-down property:

Proof:[2] Let p1 ⊆ p2 be prime ideals of A and let q2 be a prime ideal of B such that q2 ∩ A = p2. We wish to prove that there is a prime ideal q1ofB contained in q2 such that q1 ∩ A = p1. Since A ⊆ B is a flat extension of rings, it follows that Ap2 ⊆ Bq2 is a flat extension of rings. In fact, Ap2 ⊆ Bq2 is a faithfully flat extension of rings since the inclusion map Ap2 → Bq2 is a local homomorphism. Therefore, the induced map on spectra Spec(Bq2) → Spec(Ap2) is surjective and there exists a prime ideal of Bq2 that contracts to the prime ideal p1Ap2ofAp2. The contraction of this prime ideal of Bq2toB is a prime ideal q1ofB contained in q2 that contracts to p1. The proof is complete. Q.E.D.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ This follows from a much more general lemma in Bruns-Herzog, Lemma A.9 on page 415.
  • ^ Matsumura, page 33, (5.D), Theorem 4

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Going_up_and_going_down&oldid=1175477392"

    Categories: 
    Commutative algebra
    Prime ideals
    Theorems in ring theory
     



    This page was last edited on 15 September 2023, at 09:05 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki