In the mathematical subject of geometric group theory, the growth rate of a group with respect to a symmetric generating set describes how fast a group grows. Every element in the group can be written as a product of generators, and the growth rate counts the number of elements that can be written as a product of length n.
Suppose G is a finitely generated group; and T is a finite symmetric set of generators
(symmetric means that if then ).
Any element can be expressed as a word in the T-alphabet
Consider the subset of all elements of G that can be expressed by such a word of length ≤ n
This set is just the closed ball of radius n in the word metricdonG with respect to the generating set T:
More geometrically, is the set of vertices in the Cayley graph with respect to T that are within distance n of the identity.
Given two nondecreasing positive functions a and b one can say that they are equivalent () if there is a constant C such that for all positive integers n,
for example if.
Then the growth rate of the group G can be defined as the corresponding equivalence class of the function
where denotes the number of elements in the set . Although the function depends on the set of generators T its rate of growth does not (see below) and therefore the rate of growth gives an invariant of a group.
The word metric d and therefore sets depend on the generating set T. However, any two such metrics are bilipschitzequivalent in the following sense: for finite symmetric generating sets E, F, there is a positive constant C such that
As an immediate corollary of this inequality we get that the growth rate does not depend on the choice of generating set.
for some we say that G has a polynomial growth rate.
The infimum of such k's is called the order of polynomial growth.
According to Gromov's theorem, a group of polynomial growth is a virtuallynilpotent group, i.e. it has a nilpotentsubgroup of finite index. In particular, the order of polynomial growth has to be a natural number and in fact .
The existence of groups with intermediate growth, i.e. subexponential but not polynomial was open for many years. The question was asked by Milnor in 1968 and was finally answered in the positive by Rostislav Grigorchuk in 1984. There are still open questions in this area and a complete picture of which orders of growth are possible and which are not is missing.
The triangle groups include infinitely many finite groups (the spherical ones, corresponding to sphere), three groups of quadratic growth (the Euclidean ones, corresponding to Euclidean plane), and infinitely many groups of exponential growth (the hyperbolic ones, corresponding to the hyperbolic plane).
Grigorchuk R. I. (1984). "Degrees of growth of finitely generated groups and the theory of invariant means". Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. (in Russian). 48 (5): 939–985.