Zuckerman specializes in the sociology of science.[2]
She is known for her work on the social organization of science, scientific elites, the accumulation of advantage, the Matthew effect, and the phenomenon of multiple discovery.
Zuckerman served as the Senior Vice President of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation from 1991 to 2010, overseeing the Foundation's grant program in support of research, libraries and universities. She is known as an authority for her studies of educational programs, and her support of research universities, scholarship in the humanities, graduate educational programs, research libraries, and other centers for advanced study.[3]
Zuckerman was a Lecturer in Sociology at Barnard College in New York City from 1964-1965. She returned to Columbia University an Assistant Professor of Sociology in 1965, where she served as Project Director of the Bureau of Applied Social Research. She became an Associate Professor in 1972, and a Full Professor in 1978 . She chaired the Sociology department from 1978-1982.[4] In 1992, she retired from Columbia University, becoming a professor emerita.[5]
Zuckerman's research has focused on the social organization of science and scholarship. She is the author of the 1977 book, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, which has been credited with defining the direction of work in the field for the next two decades.[7] As a basis for her research, Zuckerman used a database to examine more than 60,000 academics, in a powerful demonstration of the self-reinforcing dynamics of American academic culture. Zuckerman's findings, particularly her "fundamental notion"[8] of "accumulation of advantage", questioned assumptions about creativity, achievement, eminence, and greatness.[9][8][10][11][12]
The empirical data Zuckerman analyzed, along with work by Robert K. Merton and others, documented ways in which women scientists were "systematically disadvantaged in educational attainment, productivity, funding, lab space, and recognition".[13]
Zuckerman and others have carried out subsequent work on prizes and other rewards; their impact on productivity, collaboration, and authorship;[14] and on the effectiveness of interventions whose intention is to support women and members of other underrepresented populations.
Scientific Elite is also a fascinating introduction to the phenomenon of multiple discovery in the fields of science and technology.[4] Zuckerman further examined conditions and processes influencing the introduction and adoption of scientific ideas in later work. In 1978, she introduced the idea of "postmature scientific discovery".[15]
To qualify as postmature, for it to evoke surprise from the pertinent scientific community that it was not made earlier, it must have three attributes. In retrospect, it must be judged to have been technically achievable at an earlier time with methods then available. It must be judged to have been understandable, capable of being expressed in terms comprehensible to working scientists at the time, and its implications must have been capable of having been appreciated.--Zuckerman & Lederberg, 1986.[16][17]
The sociologist of science Robert K. Merton later credited Zuckerman as a co-author of his work on the Matthew effect, writing '“It is now [1973] belatedly evident to me that I drew upon the interview and other materials of the Zuckerman study to such an extent that, clearly, the paper should have appeared under joint authorship.”[18]
The overlooking of Zuckerman's contribution can be considered an example of a pattern which she noted, which has been nicknamed the Matilda effect by science historian Margaret Rossiter.[4][19][20] Zuckerman married Merton in 1993.[21]
Zuckerman, Harriet (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press.
Elkana, Yehuda; Lederberg, Joshua; Merton, Robert K.; Thackray, Arnold; Zuckerman, Harriet, eds. (1978). Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley. ISBN9780471984351.
Zuckerman, Harriet; Miller, Roberta Balstad, eds. (1980). Science Indicators: Implications for Research and Policy Harriet Zuckerman; Roberta Balstad Miller. Based upon the 1978 May Conference spons. by the Social Science Research Council. Social Science Research Council.
Pfafflin, S. M.; Zuckerman, Harriet; Cole, Jonathan R. (1991). The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (1st ed.). New York: Norton. ISBN9780393027730.
Ehrenberg, Ronald G.; Zuckerman, Harriet; Groen, Jeffrey A.; Brucker, Sharon M. (2010). Educating Scholars: Doctoral Education in the Humanities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
^de Haan, J.; Leeuw, F. L.; Remery, C. (February 1994). "Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage in research groups". Scientometrics. 29 (2): 239–251. doi:10.1007/BF02017975. hdl:1874/427863. S2CID43849982.
^Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia; Glynn, Carroll J. (February 2013). "The Matilda Effect—Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication Articles". Communication Research. 40 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/0093650211418339. S2CID206437794.
Harriet Zuckerman, 20th Anniversary Symposium—Exhibitions Research Teaching: The Bard Graduate Center at Twenty, November 14, 2013.
