 |
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this articlebyadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | |
|---|---|
| Purpose | determine level of anxiety |
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith (1983)[1] and is commonly used by doctors to determine the levels of anxiety and depression that a person is experiencing. The HADS is a 14-item scale, with seven items relating to anxiety and seven relating to depression.[2] Zigmond and Snaith created this outcome measure specifically to avoid reliance on aspects of these conditions that are also common somatic symptoms of illness, for example fatigue and insomniaorhypersomnia. This, it was hoped, would create a tool for the detection of anxiety and depression in people with physical health problems.
The items on the questionnaire that relate to anxiety are
The items that relate to depression are:
Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression.
A number of researchers have explored HADS data to establish the cut-off points for caseness of anxiety or depression. Bjelland et al (2002)[3] through a literature review of a large number of studies identified a cut-off point of 8/21 for anxiety or depression. For anxiety (HADS-A) this gave a specificity of 0.78 and a sensitivity of 0.9. For depression (HADS-D) this gave a specificity of 0.79 and a sensitivity of 0.83.
There are a large number of studies that have explored the underlying factor structure of the HADS. Many support the two-factor structure but there are others that suggest a three or four factor structure.[4] Some argue that the tool is best used as a unidimensional measure of psychological distress.
The factor structure of the HADS has been questioned.[4] Coyne and Sonderen argue in a letter published in the same issue, that Cosco, et al.[4] provides grounds for abandoning HADS altogether.[5] The HADS has also been criticised for its over reliance on anhedonia as being the core symptom of depression, how single-item measures of depression may have the same predictive value as the HADS scale, as well as its use of British colloquial expressions which can be difficult to translate.[6]
