Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Origins  





2 Opener's Rebids Over a Jacoby 2NT Response  



2.1  Method One  





2.2  Method Two  







3 Rebids by the Jacoby 2NT Responder  





4 Variants  





5 References  














Jacoby 2NT






עברית
Polski

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Jacoby 2NT (Swedish: Stenberg 2NT) is a bridge convention in which a bid of 2NT over partner's opening bid of one heart (1) or one spade (1) shows a hand with both

The 2NT response is forcing to at least game in opener's major suit. If the partnership also plays splinter bids, the Jacoby 2NT response tends to deny the shape for a splinter (i.e., no singleton or void). However, it might be the best alternative as prelude to possible slam exploration with unbalanced support in a holding stronger than the agreed range for a splinter bid.

Origins[edit]

In most bridge literature, the convention is said to have been developed by Oswald Jacoby.[1] However, credit for its development has also been attributed to Leo Baron.[2]

Opener's Rebids Over a Jacoby 2NT Response[edit]

With a balanced hand, opener rebids as follows:[3]

With an unbalanced hand, there are two common methods of continuing rebidding over a Jacoby 2NT response, the choice of which is a matter of agreement between the partners. These methods differ only in the definition of a bid of another suit.

Method One[edit]

The earlier method uses the following bids.[4]

Method Two[edit]

The newer method uses the following bids,[3] and is included in SAYC.[5]

Less commonly, these two bids may be reversed.[6] The long suit can then be bid at the 3 level and the shortage on the following round, especially if Italian cue bids (1st/2nd round control) are in use. However, hands with just a shortage are much more frequent and are shown at a lower level by the SAYC method.

Rebids by the Jacoby 2NT Responder[edit]

The Jacoby 2NT bidder must assess how the hands fit, and generally will have the following options.

Variants[edit]

The 2NT bid is used in some systems to show an invitational or better raise (10 point upwards, at least four-card support, forcing to the three level only) rather than a game force. In 2/1 game forcing and Acol, this is used if opponents double and is called the Jordan 2NT convention in the USA; in the UK, it is sometimes called Truscott (Swedish: Invitstenberg 2NT). Some books and articles, particularly in the UK, call this Jacoby 2NT, but this is technically incorrect. Also, opener's rebid pattern has to change because responder is potentially weaker (opener rebids three of the agreed suit with a weaker opening no singels).

The Jacoby 2NT was designed for five-card majors. It can also be used in a four-card major system such as Acol, but it may then be useful to change opener's rebids to allow him to specifically show a hand with only a four-card major, typically by using 3NT. Also, the three and four-level new suit rebids may be swapped so that a three-level bid shows a long suit and a four-level bid a shortage (splinter bid).

In some forms of Acol, a 3NT response is used instead of 2NT to show a hand with 13-15 points, four-card support and no side suit shortage (a "pudding raise"). The 2NT response may also be used as a pudding raise, giving opener more options to show his hand shape and strength if interested in slam. A different bid will then be needed to show hands with 16+ HCPs, e.g. a jump shift response.

In the Baron System as developed by Leo Baron, the 2NT response was used for very strong hands of 16+ points, allowing slam exploration.[7] These could be balanced rather than showing 4 card major support, and did not include the weaker hands of 12+ points which are the most common hand type for the Jacoby 2NT.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Manley, Brent; Horton, Mark; Greenberg-Yarbro, Tracey; Rigal, Barry, eds. (2011). The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge (7th ed.). Horn Lake, MS: American Contract Bridge League. p. 293. ISBN 978-0-939460-99-1.
  • ^ "Boost Your Bidding", Danny Roth, 2019, ISBN 978-0-9828874-9-3, p 139, "Nowadays, a common solution is another invention of Baron, the Baron 2NT; some refers to it as Jacoby"
  • ^ a b ACBL "Bidding Toolkit" Article
  • ^ ACBL "In Their Own Words" Article by Jim Jacoby Archived 2012-07-19 at archive.today
  • ^ Downey, Ned; Pomer, Ellen (2005). Standard bidding with SAYC (1st ed.). Toronto: Master Point Press. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-897106-03-7.
  • ^ Brian Senior (2001). Conventions Today. Chess and Bridge Ltd, London.
  • ^ Francis, Henry G.; Truscott, Alan F.; Frey, Richard L.; Hayward, Diane, eds. (1984). The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge (4th ed.). New York: Crown Publishers. p. 514. ISBN 0-517-55272-8. LCCN 84001791.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacoby_2NT&oldid=1099798553"

    Category: 
    Bridge conventions
    Hidden category: 
    Webarchive template archiveis links
     



    This page was last edited on 22 July 2022, at 17:00 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki