The meeting was deemed a "blatant interference" by the 37th National Security Council of Pakistan[8][7] and resulted in a strong démarche to the US chargé d'affaires.[9] The 38th National Security Council reaffirmed the previous council's assessment but deemed that "no evidence of any foreign conspiracy" was found.[10][11] The former prime minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan (PTI), alleged that the events of the meeting were an attempt to influence his foreign policy,[12] and the content of the letter confirmed a conspiracy to remove him from office through a parliamentary vote of no confidence in favor of the members of the Pakistan Democratic Movement.[13] He also alleged that the letter stated that if the vote of no confidence failed, Pakistan would face dire consequences.[14] The US Spokesperson for the Department of State, Ned Price, denied the allegations, saying "there is absolutely no truth to that allegation."[15][16]
On 10 May, the 23rd Prime Minister of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif (PMLN, PDM), addressed the National Assembly and acknowledged the letter was genuine, but reiterated no conspiracy.[17]
27 March 2022: In a speech at Parade Ground in Islamabad, then-Prime Minister Imran Khan removed a document from his pocket and waved it to the crowd and media crew.[18] He claimed that "attempts are being made to influence our foreign policy from abroad. We have been aware of this conspiracy for months". He further stated that "attempts are being made through foreign money to change the government in Pakistan". PM Khan revealed that "we have been threatened in writing, but we will not compromise on national interest. The letter I have is proof, and I want to dare anyone who is doubting this letter".[5][19] PM Khan claimed that Nawaz Sharif and Shehbaz Sharif, leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League, and Asif Ali Zardari, president of the Pakistan People's Party, were also part of the conspiracy.[20]
30 March 2022: Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Athar Minallah disposed of a petition that sought a restraining order on PM Khan from disclosing the contents of the confidential letter. The court stated that it "is confident that as an elected prime minister he would not disclose any information or act in breach of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, nor the oath taken by him under the Constitution".[21]
31 March 2022: Pakistan's National Security AdvisorMoeed Yusuf briefed a meeting held by the National Security Committee (NSC) that was chaired by PM Khan.[22] Following which the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) issued a statement saying that "the committee expressed grave concern at the communication, terming the language used by the foreign official as undiplomatic" and called it a "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan by the country in question". The NSC decided that Pakistan will issue "a strong demarche to the country in question both in Islamabad and in the country's capital through a proper channel in keeping with diplomatic norms," according to the PMO statement.[13] Later in the day, the Foreign Office of Pakistan summoned an official of the United States embassy and handed over the requisite demarches.[23]
23 April 2022: It was revealed by former SAPM Shebaz Gill that the communication was initially hidden from Prime Minister Khan, and former Minister of Foreign AffairsShah Mehmood Quereshi. It was not until a "patriotic officer secretly informed Shah Mehmood Quereshi, that the communique was then sent to the Prime Minister, who was then advised to remain silent and not talk about it."[25]
2 May 2022: Khan asked US president Joe Biden, "by indulging in a regime change conspiracy to remove a democratically elected PM of a country of over 220 (million) people to bring in a puppet PM, do you think you have lessened or increased anti-American sentiment in Pakistan?"[20]
23 May 2022: Khan suggested that US State Department official Donald Lu be fired for interfering with Pakistan's domestic politics and "for bad manners and sheer arrogance." Khan added, "I had a perfectly good relationship with the Trump administration. It's only when the Biden administration came, and it coincided with what was happening in Afghanistan. And for some reason, which I still don't know, they never got in touch with me."[26]
9 Aug 2023: The night Pakistan's parliament was dissolved by PM Shehbaz Sharif and President Arif Alvi, US journal The Intercept published an article claiming a transcript leak of the Cypher. It matched all the allegations Khan had on the US administration. The contents show undiplomatic language, threats between the lines, and a vote of no-confidence against PM Imran Khan. The basis of all conversation seemed to be that the US was unhappy with Khan's visit to Moscow.[27] The leaked document caused an uproar on social media platform X in Pakistan. The article was allegedly also blocked from Pakistani mainstream media. Screenshots of WhatsApp groups were also seen on X showing orders not to discuss the article on mainstream media.[28]
3 June 2024: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) acquitted PTI founder Imran Khan and former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi in the cipher case.[29]
The complete contents of the letter are protected under Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 of Pakistan, and have not been disclosed.[30] However, selected components have been spoken about through various interviews, speeches and public statements.
The former Prime Minister Imran Khan and members of his cabinet claimed that the letter demanded the removal of the Prime Minister and if Khan remained the prime minister, it would lead to horrific consequences.[31]
It also mentioned that all would be forgiven if the Prime Minister was removed.[32]
On 10 May 2022, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif addressed the National Assembly and acknowledged the letter was threatening, but reaffirmed the notes did not mention conspiracy.[17][33]
On 9 August 2023, the alleged cypher was published in full by The Intercept.[4]
Calls for judicial commission and investigation[edit]
On 29 March 2022, the Minister for Planning, Development, and Special Initiatives, Asad Umar, said Prime Minister Khan would share the letter with the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Umar Ata Bandial.[14] The PTI government urged the Chief Justice of Pakistan to set up an independent Judicial Commission to investigate the letter.[34] The Chief Justice received the letter, however did not comment or form any commission.[35][36]
The PTI government also turned to retired Lieutenant General Tariq Khan to head a separate commission to investigate the letter.[37][38] However, the commission failed to form, as Lieutenant General Khan cited the army warned him not to be politicized,[39] and there was not enough time to properly investigate under the current government.[39][40] In an open letter, Gen. Khan wrote, "I have no connections with any politicians or political party, am known to be apolitical...I was more than willing to undertake this task," however "it appeared that the Government would not last for more than a day or two" so he could not continue.[39]
On 6 May 2022, the newly formed PDM government announced the formation of a probe to investigate the alleged foreign conspiracy.[41] This was rejected in a press conference by former Minister of Information Fawad Chaudry, who reiterated that they "will only consider commission formed under [an] independent judiciary which will have an open hearing."[42] The PTI members "questioned how the FIA, which is under Shehbaz Sharif, can hold a probe into the cipher" and any probe by this government would be biased as they were the beneficiaries of the alleged conspiracy.[42]
The former Prime Minister Khan, in separate letters written to the President of Pakistan and Chief Justice on 30 April 2022, again urged the formation of an independent Judicial Commission.[43][44]
On 10 May 2022, in a public statement, President Arif Alvi verified the contents of the letter and urged Chief Justice Umar Bandial to hold an open hearing.[45][46] He "underscored that threats could both be covert and overt and in this particular case, it was clearly communicated through undiplomatic and informal language."[45]
