Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Wave encounter  



1.1  Consequence  







2 Fate  





3 See also  





4 References  














MSStolt Surf







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


History
NameStolt Surf
OperatorStolt-Nielsen Inc.
BuilderEriksberg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Launched14 August 1970
Completed1970
IdentificationIMO number7027588
FateScrapped March 2000
General characteristics
Class and typeChemical tanker
Tonnage23,299 deadweight tons
Length556 ft 6 in (169.62 m)
Beam81 ft 3 in (24.77 m)

MSStolt Surf was a chemical tanker, operated by Stolt-Nielsen Inc. She achieved a measure of infamy when she was struck and damaged by a rogue wave, an event that was photographed by a crew member and subsequently added to the ongoing debate over the possibility of such waves out in the deep ocean.

Wave encounter[edit]

Built in 1970 at the yards of Eriksbergs, of Gothenburg, Sweden, Stolt Surf joined the merchant fleet of Stolt-Nielsen Inc., one of the largest operators of parcel tankers in the world. She served for seven years without major incident.

Stolt Surf departed Singapore on 4 October 1977, on a routine voyage across the Pacific OceantoPortland, in the United States. A storm was brewing out in the Pacific, and the advice from the weather routing agency was to keep far to the north, to avoid a developing storm to the south. Despite being contrary to his experience and instinct, Stolt Surf's Captain Oddenes decided to follow their advice.[1] This proved to be a mistake, when by 20 October Stolt Surf encountered an enormous cyclone. Whilst battling through waves in excess of the usual 10-metre (33 ft), she encountered at least one rogue wave, which towered above the tanker, reaching a height of at least 22 metres (72 ft) and rising above the height of the bridge deck. Several times waves crashed over the bridge itself. Chief engineer Karsten Petersen took a number of pictures of the storm, which recorded several features distinct to freak waves, namely deep troughs and waves so tall that they break.

The breaking wave crashing onto the deck and superstructure of Stolt Surf caused considerable damage. Three of the tank hatches and the door to the pump room were torn off, despite their strong construction. The pipelines running across the decks were bent and the gangways were tossed over the deck and wrecked. Steam pipes and electric cables were torn and ruptured, whilst the wave smashed a number of windows and port holes. Flooding entered the ship, smashing the furniture and tearing off bulkhead panelling. Despite the severe damage, there were no serious injuries, and only one sailor was subsequently hospitalised. Stolt Surf was fortunate in that her engines remained operational, and the ship was able to remain with her bow into the waves. Had she lost headway, the storm would have forced her to turn sideways into the oncoming waves, where she risked being hulled or capsized, particularly if she encountered another rogue wave. Stolt Surf limped into port a week later on 26 October.

Consequence[edit]

The evidence in the photographs showed abnormally large waves out in the deep ocean, where science, using the linear model, had predicted that such extreme waves were extremely rare, to the extent that a 30-metre (98 ft) crest-to-trough wave would occur only once every 10,000 years. The proof gathered by Stolt Surf joined a growing body of evidence that the linear model did not adequately explain all of the types of waves that could be encountered.[2] The loss of MSMünchen in a storm in the North Atlantic the following year was attributed to an 'unknown event', but was later considered to be one of the first losses that could be confidently attributed to a freak wave. Despite this, it was not until the separate encounters by the cruise liners Bremen and Caledonian Star in the South Atlantic, that the possibility of nonlinear causes of freak waves was seriously considered. The resulting theories helped to explain the possible causes of the freak waves encountered by Stolt Surf.

Fate[edit]

Stolt Surf was sold in India in March 2000, and broken up for scrap.[3]

Stolt Surf's name was perpetuated in a new tanker built for Stolt-Nielsen and launched in 2000.[4] This vessel has a deadweight tonnage value of 22,219, and is registeredinGeorge Town, Cayman Islands.[4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations
  1. ^ Petersen, Karsten. "The Storm: "Stolt Surf" in the North Pacific, 1977". Global Mariner. Retrieved 3 March 2010.
  • ^ Liu, A Chronology
  • ^ "M/S ANCO VILLE". Retrieved 11 Jan 2017.
  • ^ a b "Fleet List". Stolt-Nielsen Limited. 4 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 24 December 2015.
  • Sources

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MS_Stolt_Surf&oldid=1229759942"

    Categories: 
    Rogue wave incidents
    Maritime incidents in 1977
    Chemical tankers
    Merchant ships of Sweden
    Ships built in Gothenburg
    1970 ships
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    IMO numbers
     



    This page was last edited on 18 June 2024, at 15:44 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki