Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  





2 Membership  





3 Ideology  





4 Relation to other manosphere groups  



4.1  Men's rights movement  





4.2  Pickup artistry  







5 Notes  





6 References  





7 Works cited  





8 Further reading  





9 External links  














Men Going Their Own Way






العربية

Беларуская
Bikol Central
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
فارسی
Français

Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Lietuvių
Magyar
Nederlands

Norsk bokmål
Polski
Português
Русский
Српски / srpski
Suomi
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Vit

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
View source
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
View source
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Page semi-protected

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


MGTOW logo as shown in episode "Men at War" of the BBC series Reggie Yates' Extreme UK[1]

Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmɪɡt/) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online community advocating for men to separate themselves from women and society, which they believe has been corrupted by feminism.[2] The community is a part of the manosphere, a collection of anti-feminist websites and online communities that also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and pickup artists.[3]

Like other manosphere communities, MGTOW overlaps with the neoreactionary alt-right movement[4] and has been implicated in online harassment of women.[5] The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology.[6]

History

MGTOW ideology emerged in the early 2000s, although it is not clear where it originated.[7] A blog called No Ma'am was one of the first sites dedicated to the ideology, publishing a "MGTOW Manifesto" in 2001.[8] Earlier members of MGTOW were largely politically libertarian and focused on individual self-reliance in accordance with traditional notions of masculinity.[9] Over time, the movement's focus shifted toward male separatism.[9]

Far-right commentator and polemicist Milo Yiannopoulos is credited with helping to popularize MGTOW with a 2014 Breitbart article titled "The Sexodus", in which he described men who were eschewing women, love, sex, and marriage because of feminism.[10] MGTOW discussion forums include the subreddit r/MGTOW, created in 2011, smaller auxiliary subreddits, and MGTOW Forum, an independent website that emerged in 2014. Following Reddit's 2017 ban of a large incel subreddit, r/MGTOW was briefly the largest and most active manosphere forum on the site.[11]

Researchers have implicated MGTOW communities in online harassment of women. r/MGTOW and MGTOW Forum are among the communities which "have been growing in size and in their involvement in online harassment and real-world violence", according to computer scientist Manoel Horta Ribeiro and colleagues.[12] Shortly after publication of a 2020 preprint of a paper examining manosphere groups online, Reddit quarantined r/MGTOW, a restriction the platform applies to subreddits determined to be "extremely offensive or upsetting to the average redditor" which prevents them from earning advertising revenue and requires visitors to agree to seeing potentially offensive content before entering.[13] r/MGTOW was banned in August 2021 for breaking the site's policies against promotion of violence and hate.[14]

On October 6, 2022, Global News reported that there were hidden tags labeled "#mgtow" in videos uploaded by the team-managed YouTube channel of Canadian Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, since March 2018.[15] Poilievre said he immediately had his team remove the tags as soon as he was made aware of them, when questioned about MGTOW Poilievre stated "I condemn this organization" and "we on this side reject all misogyny and all acts of extremism, and that is how we will always conduct ourselves over here".[15]

Membership

Members of MGTOW communities are primarily heterosexual, white, middle-class men from North America and Europe. Unlike some other manosphere groups, MGTOW is exclusively male.[16] MGTOW often disavow hierarchies and claim to be leaderless; some deny that MGTOW is a group or movement at all, instead emphasizing each member's individuality and independence within a collective.[17][18] Researcher Callum Jones and colleagues write in New Media & Society that "while the precise number of MGTOW followers is unclear, it appears to be a popular and growing group within the Manosphere: the subreddit r/MGTOW has grown from 54,000 members in early 2018 to 104,000 members in early 2019 and there are 32,859 members listed on one MGTOW forum."[19] As of 2018, MGTOW was smaller than both the men's rights movement and the pickup artist communities online, with MGTOW Forum having over 25,000 subscribers and r/MGTOW having over 35,000.[9]

Ideology

At the center of MGTOW ideology is the notion of male separatism and the belief that society has been corrupted by feminism.[20] MGTOW groups are misogynist and anti-feminist, believing that feminism has made women dangerous to men, and that male self-preservation requires dissociating completely from women.[21] MGTOW and other manosphere communities overlap with the reactionary, white nationalist alt-right[4] and other white supremacist, authoritarian, and populist movements worldwide,[22] Both MGTOW and the alt-right believe that feminism has destroyed Western society.[10]

Like other manosphere groups, MGTOW believe there is systemic gynocentric bias against men in society,[23] including double standardsingender roles[20] and bias against men in family courts.[10] MGTOW endorse the belief shared by other manosphere groups that women follow a similar pattern in dating and marriage: young and attractive women are promiscuous and engage in "hypergamy", having sex with numerous men and abandoning a man if a "higher-value" man shows interest. They believe women gravitate towards "alpha men" who are attractive but mistreat them, reinforcing the ideology of feminism. According to MGTOW, as women begin to age, they settle down with "beta males" who provide for them financially, but to whom they deny sex, sometimes engaging in extramarital sex with more attractive men; these relationships ultimately lead to divorce, in which the women will be favored by the courts due to what MGTOW call female privilege.[24]

Scott Wright and colleagues at Monash University write that "MGTOW propagate extensive and wide-ranging passive or undirected harassment and misogyny on Twitter."[25] Fellows at the Institute for Research on Male Supremacism publishing with the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism have said that members of MGTOW "openly disdain women, and normalize it through online harassment."[26] The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology,[6] a category they began tracking on their hate group tracking project, Hate Map, in 2018.[27]

Men in the MGTOW community use jargon shared by the broader manosphere, including the red pill and blue pill metaphor borrowed from the film The Matrix. Those in the manosphere who have been awakened from feminist "delusion" to the supposed reality that society is fundamentally misandrist and dominated by feminist values are said to be "redpilled" or have "taken the red pill"; those who do not accept that ideology are referred to as "bluepilled".[28] Other jargon includes pejorative terms for other men such as "beta", "cuck", "soy boy", and "white knight".[29]

MGTOW men gauge their participation in the movement on a series of four levels.[30] At the first level, men believe they are used and manipulated by women (called "situational awareness" or the "red pill"[31]) but still believe in the value of marriage; they are sometimes described as "purple pilled".[32] At the second level, men reject long-term relationships, cohabitation, and marriage, but will still participate in shorter term relationships and sexual encounters.[33] At the third level, men reject short-term relationships and limit their interactions with women.[34] At the fourth level, men minimize their engagement with the state and society, including employment; this is called "going ghost".[30][note 1]

Relation to other manosphere groups

The MGTOW community is a part of the manosphere, a diverse group of websites, blogs, and online forums promoting some forms of masculinity, hostility towards women, strong opposition to feminism, and exaggerated misogyny.[35] In addition to MGTOW, the men's rights movement, incels, pick-up artists, and father's rights movements also make up the manosphere.[36]

Men's rights movement

Although some consider MGTOW to be a part of the men's rights movement,[37] others have cited MGTOW's separatist ideology as distinguishing them from the men's rights movement, which engages in activism to try to drive societal change.[38][31] According to Donna Zuckerberg, early MGTOW groups were primarily libertarian and opposed to "big government"; this led to a rift with the men's rights movements who wished to lobby for governmental change, particularly with regards to custody and divorce law.[9]

Pickup artistry

The MGTOW community has a reciprocal disdain for pickup artists (PUAs) due to their differing opinions towards women. Whereas MGTOW focuses on separating entirely from women, pickup artists focus on developing techniques to have sex with women. PUA communities have mocked MGTOW as "Virgins Going Their Own Way".[9] MGTOW communities deride PUAs as being entirely dependent on women's approval, and because they place so much value in attaining sexual success with women, MGTOW says PUA communities contribute to what they see as overvaluing of women in gynocentric society.[39]

Notes

  1. ^ The MGTOW Wiki divides social and economic disengagement into separate levels.[31]

References

  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), pp. 910–911; Nagle (2017), p. 94; Lin (2017), p. 78
  • ^ Hodapp (2017), p. xviii; Jones, Trott & Wright (2020), p. 2; Ging (2019), p. 644; Zuckerberg (2018), pp. 15–17; Nagle (2017), p. 93
  • ^ a b Zuckerberg (2018), p. 19; Chemaly (2019), p. x
  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), p. 909; Nagle (2017), pp. 18, 94; Ribeiro et al. (2021), p. 196
  • ^ a b "Male Supremacy". Southern Poverty Law Center. Archived from the original on 7 June 2018.
  • ^ Lin (2017), pp. 87–88.
  • ^ Zuckerberg (2018), pp. 27–28.
  • ^ a b c d e Zuckerberg (2018), p. 19.
  • ^ a b c Nagle (2017), p. 94.
  • ^ Ribeiro et al. (2021), p. 201.
  • ^ Ribeiro et al. (2021), p. 196.
  • ^ Basu (2020).
  • ^ Thalen (2021).
  • ^ a b Boutilier, Alex; Bimman, Abagail (7 October 2022). "Conservatives call off probe into misogynistic tags on Poilievre's YouTube channel". Global News.
  • ^ Lin (2017), pp. 77–78.
  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), p. 911.
  • ^ Lin (2017), pp. 91–92. "Most of my informants on Reddit adamantly deny MGTOW as a movement, and fashion it more as a like-minded internet collective."
  • ^ Jones, Trott & Wright (2020), p. 3.
  • ^ a b Lin (2017), p. 78.
  • ^ Nagle (2017), p. 94; Lin (2017), p. 77; Hodapp (2017), pp. xvii–xviii
  • ^ Chemaly (2019), p. x.
  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), pp. 910–911.
  • ^ Lin (2017), pp. 88–89; Nagle (2017), pp. 95–97; Ging (2019), pp. 648–651; Van Valkenburgh (2018), p. 9
  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), p. 909.
  • ^ Jasser, Kelly & Rothermel (2020).
  • ^ Janik (2018).
  • ^ Winter (2019), pp. 51–54; Lumsden (2019), p. 99; Ging (2019), p. 640; Zuckerberg (2018), pp. 1–2, 12–13; Nagle (2017), pp. 93–94
  • ^ Wright, Trott & Jones (2020), p. 920.
  • ^ a b Lin (2017), p. 90.
  • ^ a b c Hodapp (2017), p. xviii.
  • ^ Lin (2017), p. 90; Nagle (2017), p. 94
  • ^ Hodapp (2017), p. xviii; Lin (2017), p. 90; Nagle (2017), p. 94
  • ^ Hodapp (2017), p. xviii; Lin (2017), p. 90
  • ^ Hodapp (2017), p. xv; Lumsden (2019), pp. 98–99; Marwick & Lewis (2017), p. 13
  • ^ Jones, Trott & Wright (2020), p. 2; Nagle (2017), pp. 86–87; Zuckerberg (2018), p. 15–17
  • ^ Schmitz & Kazyak (2016), p. 4.
  • ^ Jones, Trott & Wright (2020), p. 2.
  • ^ Zuckerberg (2018), p. 123.
  • Works cited

  • "Men at War". Reggie Yates' Extreme UK. Season 1. Episode 2. 12 January 2016. 22 minutes in. BBC. BBC Three.
  • Boutilier, Alex (6 October 2022). "Pierre Poilievre's YouTube channel included hidden misogynistic tag to promote videos". Global News. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  • Ging, Debbie (2019). "Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 22 (4): 638–657. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706401. ISSN 1097-184X. S2CID 149239953.
  • Chemaly, Soraya (2019). "Foreword" (PDF). In Ging, Debbie; Siapera, Eugenia (eds.). Gender Hate Online: Understanding the New Anti-Feminism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9. ISBN 978-3-319-96226-9. OCLC 1108619233.
  • Hodapp, Christa (2017). Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-49-852617-3.
  • Janik, Rachel (24 April 2018). ""I laugh at the death of normies": How incels are celebrating the Toronto mass killing". Hatewatch. Southern Poverty Law Center.
  • Jasser, Greta; Kelly, Megan; Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin (20 May 2020). "Male supremacism and the Hanau terrorist attack: between online misogyny and far-right violence". International Centre for Counter-Terrorism Journal. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
  • Jones, Callum; Trott, Verity; Wright, Scott (2020). "Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment". New Media & Society. 22 (10): 1903–1921. doi:10.1177/1461444819887141. ISSN 1461-4448. S2CID 210530415.
  • Lin, Jie Liang (2017). "Antifeminism Online: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)". In Frömming, Urte Undine; Köhn, Steffen; Fox, Samantha; Terry, Mike (eds.). Digital Environments: Ethnographic Perspectives Across Global Online and Offline Spaces. Edition Medienwissenschaft. Transcript Verlag. pp. 77–96. ISBN 978-3-8376-3497-6. JSTOR j.ctv1xxrxw.9. MGTOW comprises [sic] of mostly straight, white, middle-class men from North America and Europe. Unlike other antifeminist groups, MGTOW espouse the abandonment of women and a Western society that has been corrupted by feminism.
  • Lumsden, Karen (2019). "'I Want to Kill You in Front of Your Children' Is Not a Threat. It's an Expression of a Desire': Discourses of Online Abuse, Trolling, and Violence on r/MensRights". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 91–115. ISBN 978-3-03-012632-2.
  • Marwick, Alice; Lewis, Rebecca (15 May 2017). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online (Report). New York: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  • Nagle, Angela (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4Chan And Tumblr To Trump And The Alt-Right. Alresford, England: Zero Books. ISBN 978-1-78535-543-1.
  • Ribeiro, Manoel Horta; Blackburn, Jeremy; Bradlyn, Barry; et al. (2021). "The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Vol. 15. Palo Alto, Calif.: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. pp. 196–207. arXiv:2001.07600v5. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18053. ISBN 978-1-57735-869-5. ISSN 2334-0770.
  • Raycraft, Richard (6 October 2022). "Poilievre faces calls to apologize, explain misogynist YouTube tags". CBC News. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  • Schmitz, Rachel M.; Kazyak, Emily (2016). Robinson, Christine M.; Spivey, Sue (eds.). "Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men's Rights Activist Websites". Social Sciences. 5 (2): 18. doi:10.3390/socsci5020018.
  • Thalen, Mikael (3 August 2021). "Reddit bans notorious anti-feminist subreddit 'Men Going Their Own Way'". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  • Van Valkenburgh, Shawn P. (4 December 2018). "Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 24: 84–103. doi:10.1177/1097184X18816118. ISSN 1097-184X. S2CID 233999876.
  • Winter, Aaron (2019). "Online Hate: From the Far-Right to the 'Alt-Right' and from the Margins to the Mainstream". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 39–64. ISBN 978-3-03-012632-2.
  • Wright, Scott; Trott, Verity; Jones, Callum (2020). "'The pussy ain't worth it, bro': assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW". Information, Communication & Society. 23 (6): 908–925. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1751867. ISSN 1369-118X. S2CID 219023052. MGTOWs also contribute to the propagation of online harassment. Their contribution to a 'digital culture of misogyny' [...] combined with their rapid growth as other Manosphere groups face sanctions, positions them as an influential group within the Manosphere
  • "Add tags to your YouTube video". YouTube. YouTube Help. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  • Zuckerberg, Donna (2018). Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-98982-5. JSTOR j.ctv24w63tr. OCLC 1020311558.
  • Further reading

    External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Men_Going_Their_Own_Way&oldid=1224408675"

    Categories: 
    Alt-right
    Celibacy
    Criticism of feminism
    Criticism of marriage
    Internet culture
    Manosphere
    Masculinity
    Men and feminism
    Men's movement
    Men's rights
    Misogyny
    Antifeminism
    /pol/ phenomena
    Sexual attraction
    Social issues
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages
    Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages
    Use dmy dates from January 2024
    Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018
    All articles containing potentially dated statements
     



    This page was last edited on 18 May 2024, at 06:49 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki