Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  



1.1  Twentieth century  







2 See also  





3 References  














Neo-Bourbonism






Italiano
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Francis II of Bourbon greets the Gaeta garrison
Francis II of Bourbon greets the Gaeta garrison

Neo-Bourbonism (Italian: Neoborbonismo) is a form of nostalgia for the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. The term was coined in 1960 was born with the creation of the autonomist movements in Italy and underwent a considerable surge in popularity in the years around 2011, coinciding with the celebrations of the 150th anniversary of the Unification of Italy. The Neo-Bourbonist movement is supported by small political movements, amateur websites and prolific pseudo-historical publications, leading the Italian newspaper Corriere del Mezzogiorno to speak of "neo-Bourbon revanchism, in vogue in recent years, ...".[1]

History

[edit]

The Siege of Gaeta, which ended on February 13, 1861, marked the surrender of the Bourbon kingdom of the Two Sicilies to Italian unification forces. Afterwards Bourbon propaganda developed during the Expedition of the Thousand continued during the period of post-unification brigandage. Defeat of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies was attributed to internal betrayals, and unification of Italy was view as a Piedmontese invasion, in opposition to academic historiography.[citation needed]

These viewpoints were augmented with allegations of British and Masonic plots against the kingdom, the fight between the Italian Royal Army and the brigandage, as well as with alleged arguments of Bourbon excellence such as the exemplary nature of the royal family, and the proclamation of primacy of the kingdom and city of Naples.[citation needed]

Twentieth century

[edit]

A revival of the neo-Bourbon ideology took place at the end of the twentieth century, a period of rising support for local independence movements throughout Italy with the success of the Lega Lombarda. In Southern Italy this birthed numerous local associations, historical groups, publishing, websites and blogs. These groups systematically reproduced, rewrote and exaggerated Bourbon propaganda. The movement reached its peak with the opposition to the celebrations for the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy, coming to propose a neo-Bourbon mythology based on a "nineteenth-century nationalist canon with its obsession with violated communities, the blood of martyrs, the honor of heroes and heroines, the impiety of traitors and the cruelty of enemies". The rhetoric being identical in form to the old pro-unification propaganda but working towards the opposite ends.[citation needed]

In these years false histories appeared in publication, among the various falsities it was claimed that the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was at the forefront of technology and economics in Europe, attributing to it a long list of discoveries, inventions and primates in every field of human knowledge[2] and that the repression of brigandage had led to a genocide with figures close to one million dead[3] with the establishment of extermination camps such as the Fenestrelle Fort.

These arguments have been highlighted by historians[who?] as false.[4][5] The historian Alessandro Barbero, who called the story of Fenestrelle "a historiographical and media invention", consulting the original documents of the time, verified how the prisoners of the former Bourbon army actually detained in the fort only numbered just over a thousand, of which 4 died during captivity. Similarly, the arguments on genocide have been denied by every professional magazine in the field.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ A. Leogrande (6 July 2017). "Neoborbonici a cinque stelle". Corriere del Mezzogiorno.
  • ^ "Alcuni primati del Regno di Napoli e delle Due Sicilie". Associazione culturale neoborbonica.
  • ^ P. Aprile (2016). Carnefici. Milan: Piemme.
  • ^ S. Rizzo (27 September 2017). "Quel reame felice esiste soltanto nelle bufale". Il Venerdì di Repubblica.
  • ^ A. Anderson (17 November 2016). "Il paradiso perduto dei neoborbonici".
  • ^ A. D'Ambra (10 July 2016). "Sud, non ci fu nessun genocidio". HistoriaRegni. Retrieved 5 August 2018.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neo-Bourbonism&oldid=1232269993"

    Categories: 
    Politics of Italy
    Irredentism
    Historical revisionism
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Articles containing Italian-language text
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from September 2022
    All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
    Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2022
     



    This page was last edited on 2 July 2024, at 21:26 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki