Ordos culture
Geographical range | Ordos Plateau |
---|---|
Period | late Neolithic to early Bronze Age |
Dates | c. 800–150 BCE[1] |
Preceded by | Zhukaigou culture Shimao culture Siwa culture Xicha culture |
Followed by | Han dynasty |
The Ordos culture (simplified Chinese: 鄂尔多斯文化; traditional Chinese: 鄂爾多斯文化) was a material culture occupying a region centered on the Ordos Loop (corresponding to the region of Suiyuan, including Baotou to the north, all located in modern Inner Mongolia, China)[3] during the Bronze and early Iron Age from c. 800 BCE to 150 BCE.[4] The Ordos culture is known for significant finds of Scythian art and may represent the easternmost extension of Indo-European Eurasian nomads, such as the Saka,[5][6][7] or may be linkable to Palaeo-Siberians or Yeniseians.[8] Under the Qin and Han dynasties, the area came under the control of contemporaneous Chinese states.
Background[edit]
The Ordos Plateau was covered by grass, bushes, and trees and was sufficiently watered by numerous rivers and streams to produce rich grazing lands.[9] At the time, it contained the best pasture lands on the Asian Steppe.[10]
Equestrian nomads from the north-west occupied the area previously settled by the Zhukaigou culture and the Shimao culture from the 6th to the 2nd century BCE before being driven away by the Xiongnu.[11] Some authors date the arrival from the north and west of these nomads practicing mounted warfare to the 4th century BC, corresponding roughly to the period of the conquests of Alexander the Great in Central Asia.[12] They came in several waves from Central Asia and Southern Siberia through the Gansu corridor before settling in the Ordos region.[13] They may have interacted with the Yuezhi [14] in the process.[13]
This also roughly corresponds to the period when mounted warfare was introduced in the Chinese state of Zhao, during the Warring States period, by groups called by the Chinese Hu (胡, "Nomads") or Donghu (東胡 "Eastern Nomads") and the Linhu (林胡 "Forest Nomads"),[15][16][17] who stimulated the interest of the Zhao king with their "archery from horseback" (騎射 qíshé).[13] Sometimes, Chinese sources clearly differentiated the Hu and the Xiongnu, who consolidated their eastern empire by the end of the 3rd century BC.[13] yet on other occasions Chinese sources often just classified the Xiongnu as a Hu people, which was a blanket term for nomadic people.[18][19]
Early characteristics[edit]
The Ordos are mainly known from their skeletal remains and artifacts. The Ordos culture of about 500 BCE to 100 CE is known for its "Ordos bronzes", blade weapons, finials for tent-poles, horse gear, and small plaques and fittings for clothes and horse harness, using animal style decoration with relationships both with the Scythian art of regions much further west, and also Chinese art. Its relationship with the Xiongnu is controversial; for some scholars they are the same and for others different.[20] Many buried metal artefacts have emerged on the surface of the land as a result of the progressive desertification of the region.[21]
The Ordos are thought to be the easternmost of the Iranian peoples of the Eurasian Steppe, just to the east of the better-known Yuezhi, also an Indo-European-speaking people.[6][7] Because the people represented in archaeological finds tend to display Europoid features, also earlier noted by Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen,[22] Iaroslav Lebedynsky suggests the Ordos culture had "a Scythian affinity".[23][24] Other scholars have associated it with the Yuezhi[9] or the Palaeo-Siberians (specifically, Yeniseians).[25] The weapons found in tombs throughout the steppes of the Ordos are very close to those of the Scythians and Saka.[9][26] The Ordos culture has strong similarities with the Shajing culture in Gansu to the west, the Saka culture of the Xinjiang, and the Upper Xiajiadian culture of Liaoning to the northeast.[27]
Recent archeological and genetic data suggests that the Western and Eastern Scythians of the 1st millennium BC originated independently, but both combine Yamnaya-related ancestry, which spread eastwards from the area of the European steppes, with an East Asian-related component, which most closely corresponds to the modern North Siberian Nganasan people of the lower Yenisey River, to varying degrees, but generally higher among Eastern Scythians.[28]
On the other hand, archaeological evidence now tends to suggest that the origins of Scythian culture, characterized by its kurgans burial mounds and its Animal style of the 1st millennium BC, are to be found among Eastern Scythians rather than their Western counterparts: eastern Scythian kurgans (such as the Altaic kurgan Arzhan 1 in Tuva) are older than western Scythian kurgans, and elements of the Animal style are first attested in areas of the Yenisei river and modern-day China in the 10th century BC.[29] The rapid spread of Scythian culture, from the Eastern Scythians to the Western Scythians, is also confirmed by significant east-to-west gene flow across the steppes during the 1st millennium BC.[28][29]
The Maoqinggou culture at the eastern edge of the Ordos area is also considered as a "Scythian culture", which ultimately disappeared in the 3rd-2nd centuries BCE with the onset of the Xiongnu.[30] Their culture expanded tremendously, and in the northeast of China replaced earlier cultures such as the Upper Xiajiadian.[31]
Early bronze artifacts (6-5th century BC)[edit]
Several Ordos artifacts from the 6-5th century BC reflect a nomadic culture based on the chariot rather than the mounted horse. These include chariot ornaments for chariot yokes, which have been excavated in nomadic tombs.[37]
The material used was bronze, in contrast to the silver and gold which appeared from the 4th century BC, together with the mounted-horse culture.[37] Chariot ornaments disappeared from graves around that time.[37] The artifacts were probably created in the foundries of the pre-Dynastic State of Qin for the nomadic herders of the Ordos.[37]
Introduction of new metallurgy and style (4th-3rd century BC)[edit]
Around the 4th century BC, grave goods starting to change markedly.[12] The chariot, which had been a central funerary artifact among nomadic people, was replaced by the horse. The iconography of grave artifacts became clearly derived from Altaic or Northern Asian motifs.[12] The new iconography of this period, combined with the fact that it first appears in southern Ningxia and southeastern Gansu to the west of the Ordos, suggests that these horse-mounted nomads came from Northern Asia and southern Siberia through Gansu, probably in several waves.[37]
Gold and silver replaced tinned bronze.[12] A Gold stag with eagle's head found at the southern edge of the Ordos desert exemplifies the new "intrusive style" introduced by the Ordos nomads.[12] The motif of the "raptor-headed creature" is earlier documented from the Pazyryk culture, and is part of a Eurasian symbolic system known from around the 7th century BC and identified in Saka burial sites.[13] A nomadic gold crown was also excavated in the Ordos, and dated to the 3rd century BC.[13] New techniques such as granulation were also introduced from the west across Eurasia and would then be adopted by China.[13]
These artifacts, such as those depicting raptor-headed mythological creatures, are often attributed to the Xiongnu, but this is an impossibility since the Xiongnu were not yet in the region in the 4th century BCE and could not have imported these designs to northwestern China, and furthermore these styles actually disappeared soon after the arrival of the Xiongnu.[38] They should instead be attributed to the pre-Xiongnu nomads would occupied the Ordos at that time, including possibly the Yuezhi.[38]
-
Gold stag with eagle's head, characteristic of the new style introduced by the Ordos nomads. Excavated at the southern border of the Ordos desert.[12]
-
Nomadic gold crown excavated in the Ordos, 3rd century BC[13]
-
Gold belt buckle in Scythian style, from Xigoupan M2 (4th–3rd c. BCE)
Contact with neighbouring peoples[edit]
While the ethnolinguistic origins and character of the Ordos culture are unknown, the population appears to have been significantly influenced by Indo-European cultures.[6] However, the art of the Ordos culture appears to have similarities to that of the Donghu people (Chinese: 東胡), a Mongolic-speaking nomadic tribe located to the east, suggesting that the two had close ties.[39]
The Ordos population was also in contact – and reportedly often at war – with the pre-Han and Han peoples. The Ordos culture covered, geographically, regions later occupied by the Han, including areas just north of the later Great Wall of China and straddling the northernmost hook of the Yellow River.
To the west of the Ordos culture was another Indo-European people, the Yuezhi, although nothing is known of relations between the two. (The Yuezhi were later vanquished by the Xiongnu and Wusun, who reportedly drove them westward, out of China; a subgroup of the Yuezhi is widely believed to have migrated to South Central Asia, where it constituted the ruling elite of the Kushan Empire.)
Arrival of the Xiongnu (circa 160 BC)[edit]
The Xiongnu's early appearance was recorded north of Wild Goose Gate and Dai commanderies before 265 BCE, just before the Zhao-Xiongnu War;[43][44] however, sinologist Edwin Pulleyblank (1994) contends that pre-241-BCE references to the Xiongnu are anachronistic substitutions for the Hu people instead.[45][46] They are also mentioned in Chinese sources, official ones like Records of the Grand Historian,[47] and unofficial ones like Yi Zhou Shu[48] and Classic of Mountains and Seas[49] as having occupied the Ordos plateau during the Warring States period before it was occupied by the states of Qin and Zhao.[50] It is generally thought to be their homeland; however, when exactly they came to occupy the region is unclear and archaeological finds suggest it might have been much earlier than traditionally thought.[51] The Xiongnu regained their homeland up to China's borders, more than ten years after their expulsion, during the post-Qin chaos when Meng Tian had died and convicts stationed to guard the borders returned home.[52]
As the Xiongnu expanded southward into Yuezhi territory around 160 BCE under Modun, the Yuezhi in turn defeated the Sakas and pushed them away at Issyk Kul. It is thought the Xiongnu also occupied the Ordos area during the same period, when they came in direct contact with the Chinese. From there, the Xiongnu conducted numerous devastating raids into Chinese territory (167, 158, 142, 129 BCE).[53]
The Han–Xiongnu War began with Emperor Gaozu of Han, and the Han colonized the area of the Ordos as the commandery of Shuofang in 127 BCE. Prior to this campaign, there were already earlier commanderies established by Qin and Zhao before they were overrun by the Xiongnu in 209 BCE.[54]
Xiongnu period artifacts[edit]
Belt plaques in the shape of a kneeling horse in gilded silver, were made in North China for Xiongnu patrons in 3rd-1st century BCE.[55][56] Belt buckles with animal combat scenes were made in the 2nd-1st century BCE, mainly by North China workshops for the Xiongnu. These plates were inspired by the art of the steppes, but the design was flattened and compressed within the frame.[57][56]
-
Belt buckle with paired felines attacking ibexes, derived from earlier Scythian art. Ordos, 3rd century BC. Usually described as Xiongnu despite early date.[58][59][60]
-
Belt plaque with design of wrestling men, Ordos region and western part of North China, 2nd century BC, bronze - Ethnological Museum, Berlin[61]
-
Horse attacked by tiger, Ordos, 4th-1st century BCE[62]
References[edit]
Citations[edit]
The Saka
culture in Xinjiang, the Shajin
g culture in Gansu, the Ordos c
omplex in Inner Mongolia, and t
he Upper Xiajiadian culture of
Liaoning, all point to a transi
tion from mixed agropastoral to
predominantly or exclusively p
astoral nomadic cultures. From
the seventh century onwards, ob
jects related to improved horse
management and horse riding, s
uch as the bit, cheekpieces, ho
rse masks, and bell ornaments,
became ever more widespread and
sophisticated.(28)^ abUnterländer, Martina; Palstra, Friso; Lazaridis, Iosif; Pilipenko, Aleksandr; Hofmanová, Zuzana; Groß, Melanie; Sell, Christian; Blöcher, Jens; Kirsanow, Karola; Rohland, Nadin; Rieger, Benjamin (3 March 2017). "Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe". Nature Communications. 8: 14615. Bibcode:2017NatCo...814615U. doi:10.1038/ncomms14615. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5337992. PMID 28256537.
"Ge
nomic inference reveals that Sc
ythians in the east and the wes
t of the steppe zone can best b
e described as a mixture of Yam
naya-related ancestry and an Ea
st Asian component. Demographic
modelling suggests independent
origins for eastern and wester
n groups with ongoing gene-flow
between them, plausibly explai
ning the striking uniformity of
their material culture. We als
o find evidence that significan
t gene-flow from east to west E
urasia must have occurred early
during the Iron Age." and "The
blend of EHG [European hunter-
gatherer] and Caucasian element
s in carriers of the Yamnaya cu
lture was formed on the Europea
n steppe and exported into Cent
ral Asia and Siberia". We there
fore considered an alternative
model in which we treat them as
a mix of Yamnaya and the Han (
Supplementary Table 25). This m
odel fits all of the Iron Age S
cythian groups, consistent with
these groups having ancestry r
elated to East Asians not found
in the other populations. Alte
rnatively, the Iron Age Scythia
n groups can also be modelled a
s a mix of Yamnaya and the nort
h Siberian Nganasan (Supplement
ary Note 2, Supplementary Table
26).(29)^ abUnterländer, Martina; Palstra, Friso; Lazaridis, Iosif; Pilipenko, Aleksandr; Hofmanová, Zuzana; Groß, Melanie; Sell, Christian; Blöcher, Jens; Kirsanow, Karola; Rohland, Nadin; Rieger, Benjamin (3 March 2017). "Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe". Nature Communications. 8: 14615. Bibcode:2017NatCo...814615U. doi:10.1038/ncomms14615. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5337992. PMID 28256537.
The
origin of the widespread Scyth
ian culture has long been debat
ed in Eurasian archaeology. The
northern Black Sea steppe was
originally considered the homel
and and centre of the Scythians
until Terenozhkin formulated t
he hypothesis of a Central Asia
n origin. On the other hand, ev
idence supporting an east Euras
ian origin includes the kurgan
Arzhan 1 in Tuva, which is cons
idered the earliest Scythian ku
rgan. Dating of additional buri
al sites situated in east and w
est Eurasia confirmed eastern k
urgans as older than their west
ern counterparts. Additionally,
elements of the characteristic
'Animal Style' dated to the te
nth century BCE were found in t
he region of the Yenisei river
and modern-day China, supportin
g the early presence of Scythia
n culture in the East.(30)^ Pankova, Svetlana; Simpson, St John (21 January 2021). Masters of the Steppe: The Impact of the Scythians and Later Nomad Societies of Eurasia: Proceedings of a conference held at the British Museum, 27-29 October 2017. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd. p. 523. ISBN 978-1-78969-648-6.
In the eastern end of the S
cythian world in northern China,
in the area of Lake Daihai to
the northwest of Ordos, there i
s a Scythian culture known as M
aoqinggou.(31)^ Di Cosmo, Nicola (2008). The Cambridge History of Ancient China From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Chapter 13THE NORTHERN FRONTIER IN PRE-IMPERIAL CHINA. Cambridge University Press. pp. 885–966.
BRONZE PROD
UCTION. Bronze objects from Scy
thian sites in northern China c
omprise fairly typical nomadic
objects, which have a wide dist
ribution throughout the Eurasia
n steppe belt. Among these the
most characteristic are the str
aight blade double-edged dagger,
horse gear, large ritual cauld
rons, ornamental plaques, and b
elt buckles. The daggers from O
rdos sites such as Taohongbala
and Maoqinggou are different fr
om those of the Shang and early
Zhou periods. A new and rapidl
y spread ornamental feature is
the dagger pommel with facing b
ird heads, or Antennae Style. T
his motif is very common to the
north and west, and is found w
idely in South Siberia. (...) T
he consensus today is that the
nomadic cultures of the Norther
n Zone in the late Warring Stat
es were directly linked to earl
ier inhabitants such as those o
f the lower strata of Taohongba
la and Maoqinggou. There is no
doubt, however, that the cultur
e represented by these earlier
sites expanded tremendously and,
in certain areas such as the n
ortheast, replaced earlier cult
ures such as Upper Xiajiadian.(32)^ Matsumoto, Keita (1 January 2021). "A SURVEY OF BRONZE AND EARLY IRON AGE TOOLS AND WEAPONS FROM NORTHERN MONGOLIA". Ancient cultures of Mongolia, Southern Siberia and Northern China: 332. (33)^ ab"Metropolitan Museum of Art". www.metmuseum.org. (34)^ Bunker 2002, pp. 64–65. (35)^ Bunker 2002, p. 69 item 35. (36)^ "Finial British Museum". The British Museum. (37)^ abcdeBunker 2002, pp. 23–24 (38)^ abBunker 2002, p. 30 (39)^ Lebedynsky 2007, p. 124. (40)^ Coatsworth, John; Cole, Juan; Hanagan, Michael P.; Perdue, Peter C.; Tilly, Charles; Tilly, Louise (16 March 2015). Global Connections: Volume 1, To 1500: Politics, Exchange, and Social Life in World History. Cambridge University Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-316-29777-3. (41)^ Atlas of World History. Oxford University Press. 2002. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-19-521921-0. (42)^ Fauve, Jeroen (2021). The European Handbook of Central Asian Studies. BoD – Books on Demand. p. 403. ISBN 978-3-8382-1518-1. (43)^ Shiji Vol. 81 "Stories about Lian Po and Lin Xiangru - Addendum: Li Mu" text:﹃李牧者,趙之北邊良將也。常居代鴈門,備匈奴。﹄translation: "About Li Mu, he was a good general at Zhao's northern borders. He often stationed at Dai and Wild Goose Gate, prepared [against] the Xiongnu." (44)^ Theobald, Ulrich (2019) "Li Mu 李牧"inChinaKnowledge.de - An Encyclopaedia on Chinese History, Literature and Art (45)^ Pulleyblank 1994, p. 520. (46)^ Schuessler (2014), p. 264 (47)^ Shiji Vol. 110 "Account of the Xiongnu". quote:﹃後秦滅六國,而始皇帝使蒙恬將十萬之眾北擊胡,悉收河南地。…… 匈奴單于曰頭曼,頭曼不勝秦,北徙。﹄translation: "Later on, Qin conquered six other states, and the First Emperor dispatched general Meng Tian to lead a multitude of 100,000 north to attack the barbarians (Hu); he took all lands south the Yellow River. [...] The Xiongnu chanyu was Touman; Touman could not win against Qin, so he fled north." (48)^ Lost Book of Shu, "Explaining the King's Gatherings". Quotes:﹃... 正北空同、大夏、莎車、姑他、旦略、豹胡、代翟、匈奴、樓煩、月氏、孅犁、其龍、東胡,請令以橐駝、白玉、野馬、騊駼、駃騠、良弓為獻。﹄translation: "(Yi YintoTang of Shang:) When rectifying the north, the Kongtong, Daxia, Shache, Guta, Danlüe, Baohu, Dai di, Xiongnu, Loufan, Yuezhi, Xianli, Qilong, Donghu, (I) ask (your Majesty) to command (them) to bring camels, white jade, wild horses [such as] taotu [and] jueti, [and] good bows as tributes." (49)^ Shan Hai Jing, "Classic of Regions Within the Seas: South" text:﹃海內東南陬以西者。[...] 匈奴、開題之國、列人之國並在西北。﹄translation: "Within the Seas: south-eastern corner westwards. [...] The Xiōngnú['s], Kāití's countries, those listed peoples' countries exist side-by-side in the Northwest." (50)^ Pulleyblank 1994, p. 516, 519-523. (51)^ Ma 2005, pp. 220–225. (52)^ Shiji Vol. 110 "Account of the Xiongnu" quote: "十餘年而蒙恬死,諸侯畔秦,中國擾亂,諸秦所徙適戍邊者皆復去,於是匈奴得寬,復稍度河南與中國界於故塞。" (53)^ Lebedynsky 2007, p. 131. (54)^ Ma 2005, p. 224. (55)^ abBunker 2002, p. 29. (56)^ abcd"Metropolitan Museum of Art". www.metmuseum.org. (57)^ abBunker 2002, pp. 29, 101 item 68. (58)^ Bunker 2002, p. 106, item 74. (59)^ "Metropolitan Museum of Art". www.metmuseum.org. (60)^ Kim, Moon-Ja (Professor, Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Suwon University, Korea) (2006). "A Study on the Scythian Buckle" (PDF). Journal of Fashion Business. 10(6): 49.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
(61)^ So, Jenny F.; Bunker, Emma C. (1995). Traders and raiders on China's northern frontier. Seattle : Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, in association with University of Washington Press. pp. 22 & 90. ISBN 978-0-295-97473-6.
(62)^ Bunker 2002, p. 104 item 72.
Sources[edit]
- Andreeva, Petya (2020). "Animal Style at the Penn Museum: Rethinking Portable Steppe Art and Its Visual Tropes". Orientations. 51 (4).
- Beckwith, Christopher I. (16 March 2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1400829941. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
- Bunker, Emma C. (2002). Nomadic art of the eastern Eurasian steppes: the Eugene V. Thaw and other New York collections (fully available online). New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 9780300096880.
- Hanks, Brian K.; Linduff, Katheryn M. (30 August 2009). Social Complexity in Prehistoric Eurasia: Monuments, Metals and Mobility. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521517126. Retrieved 13 March 2015.
- Harmatta, János (1992). "The Emergence of the Indo-Iranians: The Indo-Iranian Languages". In Dani, A. H.; Masson, V. M. (eds.). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The Dawn of Civilization: Earliest Times to 700 B. C. (PDF). UNESCO. pp. 346–370. ISBN 978-92-3-102719-2. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
- Lebedynsky, Yaroslav (2007). Les nomades. Éditions Errance. ISBN 9782877723466.
- Macmillan Education (2016). Macmillan Dictionary of Archaeology. Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 978-1349075898.
- Maenchen-Helfen, Otto (1973). The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture. University of California Press. ISBN 0520015967. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
- Ma, Liqing (2005). The Original Xiongnu, An Archaeological Exploration of the Xiongnu's History and Culture. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press. ISBN 7-81074-796-7.
- Thierry, François (2005). "Yuezhi et Kouchans, Pièges et dangers des sources chinoises". In Bopearachchi, Osmund; Boussac, Marie-Françoise (eds.). Afghanistan, Ancien carrefour entre l'est et l'ouest. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 421–539. ISBN 978-2-503-51681-3.
- Pulleyblank, Edwin G. "Ji Hu: Indigenous Inhabitants of Shaanbei and Western Shanxi". Opuscula Altaica: Essays Presented in Honor of Henry Schwarz: 499–531.
- Schuessler, Axel (2014). "Phonological Notes on Hàn Period Transcriptions of Foreign Names and Words" (PDF). Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series (53). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
External links[edit]
- The Relief Plaques of Eastern Eurasia and China - The Ordos Bronzes - video by Sir John Boardman, 3m 47 sec