He was Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at Maynooth College from 1902 until his death. In his time, Coffey was considered one of the foremost Catholic intellectuals in Ireland.[3] He authored a number of books, including manuals of Thomistic philosophy:
The Inductive Sciences, an Inquiry into some of their Methods and Postulates (Dublin, 1910)
The Science of Logic, 2 vols. (London, 1912)
Ontology: The Theory of Being (1912)
Epistemology, 2 vols. (London, 1917)
His manuals were widely used in the education of Roman Catholic priests and theologians in the English-speaking world,[4] up until roughly the 1960s, but have since been largely ignored. He was a contributor of articles on philosophical subjects to the Irish Ecclesiastical Record, and to the Catholic Encyclopedia.[5]
The only book review that Ludwig Wittgenstein ever published, in 1913, was a scathing review of Coffey's The Science of Logic.[2][6][7] By contrast, in 1917, his Epistemology was favourably reviewed by T. S. Eliot.[8][9][10]
In his 1903 article The Hexahemeron and Science, Coffey sought to find a middle ground in conflict between natural sciences and the Catholic Church, seeing fault on both sides.[11]
Coffey advocated for a positive view of trade unionism.[12] Some of Coffey's ideas on labour issues, however, incurred the displeasure of his superiors at Maynooth.[13]
^Rudolf Metz (3 June 2014) [1938]. A Hundred Years of British Philosophy. Routledge. p. 819. ISBN978-1-317-85322-0. The most prolific neo-scholastic writer to-day is Peter Coffey, Professor of Logic and Metaphysics in Maynooth College, Ireland (b. 1876). We owe to him a system of philosophy based on a Thomistic foundation, broadly planned and fully worked out, which is much used for instruction in Roman Catholic theological seminaries, but has hardly aroused any notice outside their walls...
^Barry Spurr (30 April 2010). Anglo-Catholic in Religion: T.S. Eliot and Christianity. Lutterworth Press. p. 19. ISBN978-0-7188-4024-2. By 1917, reviewing Peter Coffey's Thomistic work, Epistemology, Eliot was writing that the Catholic Church was 'the only Church which can even pretend to maintain a philosophy of its own'.
^Wilson, James Matthew (2010). "Style and substance: T. S. Eliot, Jacques Maritain, and Neo-Thomism". Religion & Literature. 42 (3): 43–73. JSTOR23049387.
^MacMahon, Joseph A. (1981). "The Catholic Clergy and the Social Question in Ireland, 1891–1916". Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review. 70 (280): 263–288. JSTOR30090376. Father Peter Coffey of Maynooth dealt positively with the powerful influence of trade unionism in bettering the conditions of the workers and in promoting harmony and prosperity among all classes.
^Harris, Mary (16 March 1996). "Priestly powerhouse". The Tablet: 372–373. Archived from the original on 14 August 2016. Retrieved 18 June 2016. Radical ideas were not welcomed. Peter Coffey, appointed to the chair of philosophy in 1902, was refused permission to publish The Financing of Industry and the Labour Question.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
