Peregrine developed a comprehensive data set and methodology for conducting diachronic cross-cultural research. He used this to write the Atlas of Cultural Evolution[7] and, with Melvin Ember, the Encyclopedia of Prehistory.[8] He developed the organizational structure for the Human Relations Area Files (eHRAF) Archaeology.[9]
Peregrine has conducted archaeological fieldwork in North America, Syria,[10] and South America.[11] Much of his fieldwork has involved the use of geophysical techniques to identify buried archaeological deposits. In 2009 Peregrine started the Lawrence University Archaeological Survey, which focuses on using geophysical techniques to locate unmarked graves in early Wisconsin cemeteries.[12]
Peregrine has published extensively on the Mississippian culture that affected numerous peoples in North America, and on archaeological method and theory.[14][15][16] Peregrine argued that Mississippian cultures should be seen as participants in a large system that integrated much of eastern North America in a single political economy. He initially employed world-systems theory to do this, arguing that large centers were cores of political and economic authority, which were supported by peripheral regions though the exchange of objects used in rituals of social reproduction, such as initiation and marriage.[17] The Mississippian cores themselves competitively manufactured and traded these objects, linking them into what Peregrine called a prestige-goods system. Polities vied for power over exchange, and rose and fell as their ability to control prestige-goods strengthened or waned. The response to Peregrine’s view was mixed, with some calling it “exaggerationalist” and others adopting it into their own work.[18]
In the mid-1990s Peregrine and colleagues Richard Blanton, Gary M. Feinman, and Steven Kowalewski developed “dual-processual” theory in studying Mesoamerican civilization.[19] Peregrine also applied this theory to Mississippian polities.
Dual-processual theory posits that political leaders adopt strategies for implementing power ranging along a continuum from being highly exclusionary to highly inclusive. Exclusionary (or network) strategies are like those, which Peregrine said, were in place among Mississippian polities. Peregrine argued that inclusive (or corporate) ones were in place among some Ancestral Puebloan polities. While not without controversy, dual processual theory has come to be seen as a valuable tool for understanding both Mississippian and Ancestral Puebloan polities.[20]
More recently Peregrine and colleague Steven Lekson have argued that the Mississippian and Ancestral Puebloan worlds should be viewed as linked together, along with Early Postclassic Mesoamerica, in a continent-wide “oikoumene”.[21] They argue that only such a continental perspective can allow archaeologists to understand broad processes of coordinated change, such as the emergence of urban-like communities in many parts of North America around 900 CE. Again, though not without controversy, Peregrine’s multi-regional perspective has been seen as useful for addressing some questions in North American archaeology.[22]
In addition to archaeology Peregrine has also made a number of contributions to cross-cultural studies. The focus of his work has been on developing archaeological correlates for various types of behavior, including warfare, postmarital residence, and social stratification.[23] Peregrine also developed new methodologies for conducting diachronic cross-cultural research using archaeological cases.[24][25] Peregrine is now using diachronic cross-cultural research to explore how ancient societies were able to successfully build resilience to climate-related disasters.[26] He argues that this work may help modern societies to create policies to enhance resilience to the increasing frequency of climate-related disasters caused by climate change.[27]
^Zettler, Richard (1997). Subsistence and Settlement in a Marginal Environment: Tell es-Sweyhat, 1989-1995. Philadelphia: Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology. pp. 73–84.
^Peregrine Peter N. (2016-04-30). Archaeological research : a brief introduction (2nd ed.). London. ISBN9781629583433. OCLC912045453.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^Peter N. Peregrine (1992). Mississippian Evolution: A World-Systems Perspective. Madison: Prehistory Press. ISBN978-1881094005.
^King, Adam (2002). Etowah: The Political History of a Chiefdom Capitol. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. ISBN978-0817312244.
^Blanton, Richard E.; Feinman, Gary M.; Kowalewski, Stephen A.; Peregrine, Peter N. (1996). "A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization". Current Anthropology. 37 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1086/204471. JSTOR2744152. S2CID51751402.
^Peter N. Peregrine; Steven Lekson (2012). "The North American Oikoumene". In Timothy Pauketat (ed.). Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 64–72. ISBN978-0195380118.
^Pauketat, Timothy R. (2012). "Questioning the Past in North America". In Timothy Pauketat (ed.). Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–17. ISBN978-0195380118.
^see, e.g., Melvin Ember et al. "Cross-cultural research as a Rosetta Stone for finding the original homelands of language groups," Cross-Cultural Research Volume 40, Number 1, pages 18-28, 2006.
^Peregrine, Peter N.; Ember, Carol R.; Ember, Melvin (2004). "Universal Patterns in Cultural Evolution: An Empirical Analysis Using Guttman Scaling". American Anthropologist. 106 (1): 145–149. doi:10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.145. JSTOR3567449.
^Smith, Michael E. (2012). Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies. Tucson: Cambridge University Press. pp. 4–20, 165–191.
