Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 As law  



1.1  As moral law  





1.2  As a juridic law  





1.3  As scientific law  







2 As axiom or logical fundament  



2.1  Principle of sufficient reason  





2.2  Principle of non-contradiction  





2.3  Principle of excluded middle  







3 See also  





4 References  





5 External links  














Principle







العربية
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
Български
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français

Հայերեն
ि
Hrvatski
Ido
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano

Қазақша
Kiswahili
Na Vosa Vakaviti

Norsk bokmål
Norsk nynorsk
Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча

Português
Română
Русский
Shqip
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Soomaaliga
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Suomi
Svenska
Türkçe
Українська
ייִדיש

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The concept of blind justice is a moral principle.[1]

Aprinciple is a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of beliefs or behavior or a chain of reasoning.[2] That is a guide for behavior or evaluation. In law, it is a rule that has to be or usually is to be followed. It can be desirably followed, or it can be an inevitable consequence of something, such as the laws observed in nature or the way that a system is constructed. The principles of such a system are understood by its users as the essential characteristics of the system, or reflecting the system's designed purpose, and the effective operation or use of which would be impossible if any one of the principles was to be ignored.[3] A system may be explicitly based on and implemented from a document of principles as was done in IBM's 360/370 Principles of Operation.

Examples of principles are, entropy in a number of fields, least action in physics, those in descriptive comprehensive and fundamental law: doctrines or assumptions forming normative rules of conduct, separation of church and state in statecraft, the central dogma of molecular biology, fairness in ethics, etc.

In common English, it is a substantive and collective term referring to rule governance, the absence of which, being "unprincipled", is considered a character defect. It may also be used to declare that a reality has diverged from some ideal or norm as when something is said to be true only "in principle" but not in fact.

As law

[edit]

As moral law

[edit]
Socrates preferred to face execution rather than betray his moral principles.[4]

A principle represents values that orient and rule the conduct of persons in a particular society. To "act on principle" is to act in accordance with one's moral ideals.[5] Principles are absorbed in childhood through a process of socialization. There is a presumption of liberty of individuals that is restrained. Exemplary principles include First, do no harm, the Golden Rule and the Doctrine of the Mean.

As a juridic law

[edit]

It represents a set of values that inspire the written norms that organize the life of a society submitting to the powers of an authority, generally the State. The law establishes a legal obligation, in a coercive way; it therefore acts as principle conditioning of the action that limits the liberty of the individuals. See, for examples, the territorial principle, homestead principle, and precautionary principle.

As scientific law

[edit]

Archimedes principle, relating buoyancy to the weight of displaced water, is an early example of a law in science. Another early one developed by Malthus is the population principle, now called the Malthusian principle.[6] Freud also wrote on principles, especially the reality principle necessary to keep the id and pleasure principle in check. Biologists use the principle of priority and principle of Binominal nomenclature for precision in naming species. There are many principles observed in physics, notably in cosmology which observes the mediocrity principle, the anthropic principle, the principle of relativity and the cosmological principle. Other well-known principles include the uncertainty principleinquantum mechanics and the pigeonhole principle and superposition principle in mathematics.

As axiom or logical fundament

[edit]

Principle of sufficient reason

[edit]

The principle states that every event has a rational explanation.[7] The principle has a variety of expressions, all of which are perhaps best summarized by the following:

For every entity x, if x exists, then there is a sufficient explanation for why x exists.
For every event e, if e occurs, then there is a sufficient explanation for why e occurs.
For every proposition p, if p is true, then there is a sufficient explanation for why p is true.

However, one realizes that in every sentence there is a direct relation between the predicate and the subject. To say that "the Earth is round", corresponds to a direct relation between the subject and the predicate.

Principle of non-contradiction

[edit]
Portrait bust of Aristotle; an Imperial Roman copy of a lost bronze sculpture made by Lysippos

According to Aristotle, “It is impossible for the same thing to belong and not to belong at the same time to the same thing and in the same respect.”[8] For example, it is not possible that in exactly the same moment and place, it rains and does not rain.[9]

Principle of excluded middle

[edit]

The principle of the excluding third or "principium tertium exclusum" is a principle of the traditional logic formulated canonically by Leibniz as: either AisBorA isn't B. It is read the following way: either P is true, or its denial ¬P is.[10] It is also known as "tertium non datur" ('A third (thing) is not'). Classically it is considered to be one of the most important fundamental principles or laws of thought (along with the principles of identity, non-contradiction and sufficient reason).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jacoby, Jeff. "Lady Justice's blindfold." Boston.com. 10 May 2009. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ Stevenson, Angus; Lindberg, Christine A., eds. (2010-01-01). "New Oxford American Dictionary". doi:10.1093/acref/9780195392883.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-539288-3. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • ^ Alpa, Guido (1994) General Principles of Law, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 1: Is. 1, Article 2. from Golden Gate University School of Law
  • ^ "The Ethics of Socrates." Archived 2018-05-01 at the Wayback Machine Philosophy. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ "Full Transcript: Jeff Flake’s Speech on the Senate Floor." New York Times. 24 October 2017. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ Elwell, Frank W. "T. Robert Mathus's Principle ...." Rogers State University. 2013. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ "Principle of Sufficient Reason." Archived 2018-06-11 at the Wayback Machine Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 7 September 2016. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ "Aristotle on Non-contradiction." Archived 2018-06-11 at the Wayback Machine Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 12 June 2015. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ "Great Philosophers." Oregon State University. 2002. 25 October 2017.
  • ^ Whitehead, Alfred North (2005). Principia mathematica, by Alfred North Whitehead ... and Bertrand Russell.
  • [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Principle&oldid=1235280268"

    Categories: 
    Principles
    Concepts in epistemology
    Concepts in ethics
    Concepts in metaphysics
    Concepts in the philosophy of mind
    Concepts in the philosophy of science
    Metaphysics of mind
    Ontology
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 errors: missing periodical
    Webarchive template wayback links
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Articles with GND identifiers
    Articles with J9U identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 18 July 2024, at 14:36 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki