Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  





2 Propulsion  





3 See also  





4 References  





5 External links  














Reusable Booster System






Русский
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The Reusable Booster System (RBS) was a United States Air Force research program, circa 2010 to 2012, to develop a new prototype vertical-takeoff, horizontal-landing (VTHL)[1] reusable booster and a new prototype expendable second stage to replace the existing Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles (EELV) after 2025.[2] The program was discontinued in 2012.[3]

History[edit]

Program funding was initially set at US$250,000,000.[1]"Officials anticipate awarding up to three contracts for the project, where winners would compete for individual tasks of experiments and demonstrations that address technology, processes and other attributes of a reusable booster system, or RBS." The proposal deadline was March 19, 2011.[1] The Air Force had developed a notional plan to build a fleet of eight of the RBS systems, to be flown from both Vandenberg Air Force BaseinCalifornia and Cape Canaveral Air Force StationinFlorida.[3]

Three designs were submitted: by Andrews Space, Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The first phase of the flight experiment in 2014 was to be a vertical takeoff, going downrange at not much more Mach 1, and a horizontal landing.[4]

In December 2011, Lockheed Martin was awarded a contract to build a flight demonstration vehicle, the RBS Pathfinder, which was to have been completed in 2015.[5] It was being developed under the Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) RBS Flight and Ground Experiments (RBS-FGE) program.[6]

In 2012, Lockheed began initial (short burn) rocket engine tests.[4]

Phase 2 (e.g. demonstrating the rocketback maneuver) was cancelled by September 2012.[7]

The program was discontinued in October 2012, citing Department of Defense funding reductions and an October 2012 negative report[8] by the National Research Council (NRC), after having expended only a small fraction of the original $250 million budget planned to be spent through 2019.[3]

Among other factors, the October 2012 NRC report suggested that the Air Force "should develop and fly more than one Pathfinder test vehicle design [and that] competition amongst RBS concepts should be maintained as long as possible to obtain the best system for the next generation of space launch."[3]

Propulsion[edit]

A large-liquid-engine group comprising the Air Force Space Command, propulsion researchers from AFRL and Space and Missile Systems Center's launch systems program office was also meeting to discuss engine options. The group considered whether to focus on developing oxygen-rich, staged combustion (ORSC) engines like the Air Force's long-running Hydrocarbon Boost program, use an existing design like the TR-107[9] or evolve a newer engine such as Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne's J-2X or RL60. Any path would have resulted in building an engine capable of roughly 250,000 lbf (1112 kN) thrust by 2020.[needs update]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Cogliano (March 22, 2011). "Air Force launches $250M reusable booster initiative". Dayton Business Journal. Retrieved March 24, 2011. Officials anticipate awarding up to three contracts for the project, where winners would compete for individual tasks of experiments and demonstrations that address technology, processes and other attributes of a reusable booster system, or RBS. Air Force officials envision an RBS that includes a reusable rocket and an expendable upper stage rocket. The reusable rocket would have been launched vertically and return, landing aircraft style on a runway, after carrying the space craft to a point where the expendable rocket could take over.
  • ^ "Air Force studying reusable upper stage systems for reusable booster". RLV and Space Transport News. September 20, 2010. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011. Retrieved March 24, 2011.
  • ^ a b c d Ferster, Warren (October 19, 2012). "Prototype Reusable Rocket Effort Felled by U.S. Budget Woes". Space News. Retrieved October 21, 2012.
  • ^ a b Reusable Successor To EELV Moving Ahead April 23, 2012
  • ^ "Lockheed Martin Selected USAF for Reusable Booster System Flight Demonstrator Program". www.space-travel.com.
  • ^ "Reusable Successor to EELV Moving Ahead". Archived from the original on 2012-05-11. Retrieved 2022-07-16.
  • ^ Foust, Jeff (November 26, 2012). "What is the future of the RLV?". The Space Review.
  • ^ Reusable Booster System – Review and Assessment. The NRC 2012 report
  • ^ "TR 107 Main Engine" (Press release). January 2012.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reusable_Booster_System&oldid=1206171925"

    Categories: 
    Cancelled space launch vehicles
    Proposed reusable launch systems
    Space launch vehicles of the United States
    United States Air Force
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Wikipedia articles in need of updating from August 2019
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
     



    This page was last edited on 11 February 2024, at 11:12 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki