Sir Richard van der Riet WoolleyOBEFRS[1] (24 April 1906 – 24 December 1986)[2] was an English astronomer who became the eleventh Astronomer Royal. His mother's maiden name was Van der Riet.
Woolley is known for his initial disbelief in the practicalities of space flight, a notion he shared with Sir Harold Spencer Jones, his predecessor as Astronomer Royal. In a 1936 book review of P.E. Cleator's Rockets Through Space,[10] Woolley wrote:
"The whole procedure [of shooting rockets into space]...presents difficulties of so fundamental a nature, that we are forced to dismiss the notion as essentially impracticable, in spite of the author's insistent appeal to put aside prejudice and to recollect the supposed impossibility of heavier-than-air flight before it was actually accomplished" [11]
On appointment as Astronomer Royal, he reiterated his long-held view that "space travel is utter bilge". Speaking to Time in 1956, Woolley noted
"It's utter bilge. I don't think anybody will ever put up enough money to do such a thing . . . What good would it do us? If we spent the same amount of money on preparing first-class astronomical equipment we would learn much more about the universe . . . It is all rather rot" [12]
Woolley's protestations came just one year prior to the launch of Sputnik 1, five years before the start of the Apollo Program, and thirteen years before the first human landing on the Moon.
In a 1995 letter to New Scientist, J.A. Terry and John Rudge pointed out that the quotation ascribed to Woolley is actually a misquotation of what he actually said (as they had heard themselves on Radio Newsreel). Terry and Rudge report that Woolley's statement was: "All this talk about space travel is utter bilge, really." Woolley went on to say: "It would cost as much as a major war just to put a man on the moon." Terry and Rudge assert that Woolley's latter prediction turned out to be quite accurate, and state that the deletion of the first four words of the quotation by newspaper editors was in reaction to the fact that it was those self-same newspaper's hyperbolic articles, talking about space travel, that Woolley was criticising. "Anyone", said Terry and Rudge, "who had seen the flamboyant articles about space travel and the imminent colonisation of the moon and planets that were splashed all over the newspapers in 1956, with science fiction-style illustrations, must have been immediately aware of what the new Astronomer Royal was riled about."[13]
^GRO Register of Births: JUN 1906 5a 296 WEYMOUTH - Richard Van der Riet Woolley
^ abLynden-Bell, Donald (1987). "Professor Sir Richard Woolley, OBE, ScD, FRS, 1906–86". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 28 (4): 546–551. Bibcode:1987QJRAS..28..546L.
^Stickland, D. J. (1987). "Obituary: Sir Richard Woolley". The Observatory. 107 (1077): 99. Bibcode:1987Obs...107...99S.
^Feast, M. W. (1987). "Sir Richard Woolley, An Appreciation". Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa. 46 (1): 4–6. Bibcode:1987MNSSA..46....4F.
^Stratton, F.J.M. "The History of the Cambridge Observatories" Annals of the Solar Physics Observatory, Cambridge (1949)
^Lovell, Bernard (1971). "The Gold Medal: Sir Richard Woolley". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 12 (2): 135–137. Bibcode:1971QJRAS..12..135L.
