Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Etymology  





2 Overview  



2.1  Referent  





2.2  Context  





2.3  Capabilities  





2.4  Effects  





2.5  Contested approaches  







3 Security contexts (examples)  



3.1  Computer security  





3.2  Corporate security  





3.3  Environmental security  





3.4  Food security  





3.5  Home security  





3.6  Human security  





3.7  Information security  





3.8  National security  







4 Security concepts (examples)  





5 Perceptions of security  





6 See also  





7 References  





8 External links  














Security






العربية
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca

 / Bân-lâm-gú
Български
Brezhoneg
Català
Dansk
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Frysk
Galego


ि
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית


Қазақша
Kiswahili
Kurdî
Bahasa Melayu
Na Vosa Vakaviti
Nederlands

Norsk bokmål
Олык марий

Polski
Русский
Shqip
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Sunda
Suomi
Tagalog

Тоҷикӣ

Türkçe
Tiếng Vit

ייִדיש


 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Women's Army Corps (1941–1945) associated national security with avoiding conversations about war work.

Security is protection from, or resilience against, potential harm (or other unwanted coercion). Beneficiaries (technically referents) of security may be persons and social groups, objects and institutions, ecosystems, or any other entity or phenomenon vulnerable to unwanted change.

Refugees fleeing war and insecurity in Iraq and Syria arrive at Lesbos Island, supported by Spanish volunteers, 2015

Security mostly refers to protection from hostile forces, but it has a wide range of other senses: for example, as the absence of harm (e.g., freedom from want); as the presence of an essential good (e.g., food security); as resilience against potential damage or harm (e.g. secure foundations); as secrecy (e.g., a secure telephone line); as containment (e.g., a secure roomorcell); and as a state of mind (e.g., emotional security).

Security is both a feeling and a state of reality. One can feel secure, while they aren't, but also feel insecure while they are secure. This distinction is usually not very clear to express in the English language.[1]

The term is also used to refer to acts and systems whose purpose may be to provide security (security company, security police, security forces, security service, security agency, security guard, cyber security systems, security cameras, remote guarding). Security can be physical and virtual.

Etymology[edit]

The word 'secure' entered the English language in the 16th century.[2] It is derived from Latin securus, meaning freedom from anxiety: se (without) + cura (care, anxiety).[2]

Overview[edit]

Referent[edit]

A security referent is the focus of a security policy or discourse; for example, a referent may be a potential beneficiary (or victim) of a security policy or system.

Security referents may be persons or social groups, objects, institutions, ecosystems, or any other phenomenon vulnerable to unwanted change by the forces of its environment.[3] The referent in question may combine many referents in the same way that, for example, a nation-state is composed of many individual citizens.[4]

Context[edit]

The security context is the relationships between a security referent and its environment.[3] From this perspective, security and insecurity depend first on whether the environment is beneficial or hostile to the referent and also on how capable the referent is of responding to their environment in order to survive and thrive.[4]

Capabilities[edit]

The means by which a referent provides for security (or is provided for) vary widely. They include, for example:

Effects[edit]

Any action intended to provide security may have multiple effects. For example, an action may have a wide benefit, enhancing security for several or all security referents in the context; alternatively, the action may be effective only temporarily, benefit one referent at the expense of another, or be entirely ineffective or counterproductive.

Contested approaches[edit]

Approaches to security are contested and the subject of debate. For example, in debate about national security strategies, some argue that security depends principally on developing protective and coercive capabilities in order to protect the security referent in a hostile environment (and potentially to project that power into its environment, and dominate it to the point of strategic supremacy).[5][6][7] Others argue that security depends principally on building the conditions in which equitable relationships can develop, partly by reducing antagonism between actors, ensuring that fundamental needs can be met, and also ensuring that differences of interest can be negotiated effectively.[8][4][9]

Security contexts (examples)[edit]

The table shows some of the main domains where security concerns are prominent.

The range of security contexts is illustrated by the following examples (in alphabetical order):

Computer security[edit]

Computer security, also known as cybersecurity or IT security, refers to the security of computing devices such as computers and smartphones, as well as computer networks such as private and public networks, and the Internet. The field has growing importance due to the increasing reliance on computer systems in most societies.[10] It concerns the protection of hardware, software, data, people, and also the procedures by which systems are accessed. The means of computer security include the physical security of systems and the security of information held on them.

Corporate security[edit]

Corporate security refers to the resilience of corporations against espionage, theft, damage, and other threats. The security of corporations has become more complex as reliance on IT systems has increased, and their physical presence has become more highly distributed across several countries, including environments that are, or may rapidly become, hostile to them.

Security checkpoint at the entrance to the Delta Air Lines corporate headquartersinAtlanta
X-ray machines and metal detectors are used to control what is allowed to pass through an airport security perimeter.
Security checkpoint at the entrance to a shopping mallinJakarta, Indonesia

Environmental security[edit]

Environmental security, also known as ecological security, refers to the integrity of ecosystems and the biosphere, particularly in relation to their capacity to sustain a diversity of life-forms (including human life). The security of ecosystems has attracted greater attention as the impact of ecological damage by humans has grown.[11]

Graffiti about environmental security, Belarus, 2016

Food security[edit]

Food security refers to the ready supply of, and access to, safe and nutritious food.[12] Food security is gaining in importance as the world's population has grown and productive land has diminished through overuse and climate change.[13][14]

Climate change is affecting global agriculture and food security.

Home security[edit]

Home security normally refers to the security systems used on a property used as a dwelling (commonly including doors, locks, alarm systems, lighting, fencing); and personal security practices (such as ensuring doors are locked, alarms are activated, windows are closed etc.)

Security spikes on the wall of a gated community in the East End of London

Human security[edit]

Youth play among the bombed ruins of Gaza City, 2009

Human security is an emerging paradigm that, in response to traditional emphasis on the right of nation-states to protect themselves,[15] has focused on the primacy of the security of people (individuals and communities).[16] The concept is supported by the United Nations General Assembly, which has stressed "the right of people to live in freedom and dignity" and recognized "that all individuals, in particular vulnerable people, are entitled to freedom from fear and freedom from want".[17]

Information security[edit]

Information security refers to the security of information in any form. Spoken, written, digital, networked, technological, and procedural forms of information are all examples that may be covered in an information security management scheme. Computer security, IT security, ICT security, and network security are thus all subdomains of information security.[18]

National security[edit]

National security refers to the security of a nation-state, including its people, economy, and institutions. In practice, state governments rely on a wide range of means, including diplomacy, economic power, and military capabilities.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection vehicle at the Canada–United States border

Security concepts (examples)[edit]

Certain concepts recur throughout different fields of security:

Perceptions of security[edit]

Since it is not possible to know with precision the extent to which something is 'secure' (and a measure of vulnerability is unavoidable), perceptions of security vary, often greatly.[4][19] For example, a fear of death by earthquake is common in the United States (US), but slipping on the bathroom floor kills more people;[19] and in France, the United Kingdom, and the US, there are far fewer deaths caused by terrorism than there are women killed by their partners in the home.[20][21][22][23]

Another problem of perception is the common assumption that the mere presence of a security system (such as armed forcesorantivirus software) implies security. For example, two computer security programs installed on the same device can prevent each other from working properly, while the user assumes that he or she benefits from twice the protection that only one program would afford.

Security theater is a critical term for measures that change perceptions of security without necessarily affecting security itself. For example, visual signs of security protections, such as a home that advertises its alarm system, may deter an intruder, whether or not the system functions properly. Similarly, the increased presence of military personnel on the streets of a city after a terrorist attack may help to reassure the public, whether or not it diminishes the risk of further attacks.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Schneier, Bruce. "The Difference Between Feeling and Reality in Security". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  • ^ a b Online Etymology Dictionary. "Origin and meaning of secure". etymonline.com. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ a b Barry Buzan, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998), p. 32
  • ^ a b c d Gee, D (2016). "Rethinking Security: A discussion paper" (PDF). rethinkingsecurity.org.uk. Ammerdown Group. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ US, Department of Defense (2000). "Joint Vision 2020 Emphasizes Full-spectrum Dominance". archive.defense.gov. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ House of Commons Defence Committee (2015). "Re-thinking defence to meet new threats". publications.parliament.uk. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ General Sir Nicholas Houghton (2015). "Building a British military fit for future challenges rather than past conflicts". gov.uk. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ FCNL (2015). "Peace Through Shared Security". Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ Rogers, P (2010). Losing control : global security in the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). London: Pluto Press. ISBN 9780745329376. OCLC 658007519.
  • ^ "Reliance spells end of road for ICT amateurs", May 07, 2013, The Australian
  • ^ United Nations General Assembly (2010). "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 20 December 2010". un.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ United Nations. "Hunger and food security". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ Food and Agriculture Organization (2013). "Greater focus on soil health needed to feed a hungry planet". fao.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ Arsenault, C (2014). "Only 60 Years of Farming Left If Soil Degradation Continues". Scientific American. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ United Nations (1945). "Charter of the United Nations, Chapter VII". un.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ United Nations. "UN Trust Fund for Human Security". un.org. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ United Nations General Assembly (2005). "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 60/1: World Summit Outcome" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ Newsome, Bruce (2013). A Practical Introduction to Security and Risk Management. SAGE Publications. ISBN 1483313409.
  • ^ a b Bruce Schneier, Beyond Fear: Thinking about Security in an Uncertain World, Copernicus Books, pages 26–27
  • ^ David Anderson QC (2012). "The Terrorism Acts in 2011" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ "What is femicide?". Women's Aid. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ "Don't Believe In The War On Women? Would A Body Count Change Your Mind?". Upworthy. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • ^ "Violences conjugales: 118 femmes tuées en 2014". Libération.fr (in French). Retrieved 2017-12-17.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Security&oldid=1222528175"

    Categories: 
    Security
    Prevention
    Law enforcement
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 French-language sources (fr)
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Commons category link from Wikidata
    Articles with BNF identifiers
    Articles with BNFdata identifiers
    Articles with GND identifiers
    Articles with PLWABN identifiers
    Articles with EMU identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 6 May 2024, at 13:31 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki