Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 References  





2 External links  














Selective Draft Law Cases







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Arver v. United States
Grahl v. United States
Wangerin v. United States
Wangerin v. United States
Kramer v. United States
Graubard v. United States
Argued December 13–14, 1917
Decided January 7, 1918
Full case nameArver v. United States, 245 U.S. 366
Grahl v. United States
Wangerin v. United States
Wangerin v. United States
Goldman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474
Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478
Ruthenburg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480
Graubard v. United States
Citations245 U.S. 366 (more)

Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinion
MajorityWhite, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Selective Service Act of 1917

Arver v. United States, 245 U.S. 366 (1918), also known as the Selective Draft Law Cases, was a United States Supreme Court decision which upheld the Selective Service Act of 1917, and more generally, upheld conscription in the United States. The Supreme Court held that conscription did not violate the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition of involuntary servitude, or the First Amendment's protection of freedom of conscience.

The Solicitor General's argument, and the court's opinion, were based primarily on Kneedler v. Lane, which was actually multiple opinions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania during the American Civil War that upheld the Enrollment Act, and Vattel's The Law of Nations (1758).[1][2] The reliance on the Kneedler v. Lane decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court have been questioned on multiple occasions.[2][3]

As reasoning for its decision, laws of the following governments of sovereign states were given as listed in The Statesman's Yearbook for 1917 as enforcing military service:

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Leach, Jack Franklin (1952). Conscription in the United States: Historical Background. Rutland, Vt.: C.E. Tuttle Pub. Co. p. vi. OCLC 1727243.
  • ^ a b Delehant, John W. (December 1967). "A Judicial Revisitation Finds Kneedler v. Lane Not So 'Amazing'". ABA Journal. 53: 1132.
  • ^ Bernstein, JL (August 1967). "Conscription and the Constitution: The Amazing Case of Kneedler v. Lane". ABA Journal. 53: 708.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 656.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 667.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 712.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 738.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 747.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 728.
  • ^ Military Service Act of August 27, 1917, expressly providing for service abroad. Printed in the Congressional Record of September 20, 1917, 55th Cong. Rec., p. 7959
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 790.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 754.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 770.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 811.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 820.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1270.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 841.
  • ^ La loi du 15 juillet 1889 sur le recrutement de l'armée, July 15, 1889 (Duvergier, vol. 89, p. 440), modified by act of March 21, 1905 (Duvergier, vol. 105, p. 133)
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1001.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 914.
  • ^ Constitution, German Empire, April 16, 1871, Art. 57, 59
  • ^ Gesetz, betreffend Aenderungen der Wehrpflicht, vom February 11, 1888, No. 1767, Reichs-Gesetzblatt, p. 11, amended by law of July 22, 1913, No. 4264, RGBl., p. 593
  • ^ Dodd 1909, p. 344.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1009.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1018.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1036.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1064.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1090.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1098.
  • ^ a b Keltie 1917, p. 1191.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1142.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1152.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1201.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1220.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1240.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1281.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1288.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1300.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1337.
  • ^ Keltie 1917, p. 1353.
  • Dodd, Walter Fairleigh (1909). Modern Constitutions. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC 1903346.
  • [edit]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Selective_Draft_Law_Cases&oldid=1233527897"

    Categories: 
    1918 in United States case law
    Conscription in the United States
    Conscription law
    United States Supreme Court cases
    United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court
    United States Thirteenth Amendment case law
    United States in World War I
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles containing French-language text
    Articles containing German-language text
    Use mdy dates from December 2017
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
     



    This page was last edited on 9 July 2024, at 15:13 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki