Contents

Smith v. Goguen

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this articlebyadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Smith v. Goguen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Smith v. Goguen
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 12–13, 1973 Decided March 25, 1974
Full case name	Smith v. Goguen
Citations	415 U.S. 566 (more) 94 S. Ct. 1242; 39 L. Ed. 2d 605; 1974 U.S. LEXIS 113
Case history
Prior	Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Holding
Flag desecration laws that prohibit "contemptuous" treatment of the flag are overly broad.
Court membership
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
Majority	Powell, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall
Concurrence	White
Dissent	Blackmun, joined by Burger
Dissent	Rehnquist, joined by Burger
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV

Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that flag desecration laws that prohibit "contemptuous" treatment of the flag are overly broad.

Background[edit]

Goguen, a teenager from Massachusetts, was arrested by police for wearing a small cloth US flag on the seat of his pants. When arrested, Goguen was standing on the sidewalk, talking; he was not engaged in any demonstration. Goguen was convicted and sentenced to 6 months in jail for violating a flag desecration law encompassing anyone who treats the flag "contemptuously". His conviction was upheld by the Massachusetts Supreme Court. Assisted by the ACLU, Goguen appealed to the Federal court, and the Federal court overturned his conviction. Massachusetts appealed to the US Supreme Court.

Opinion of the Court[edit]

The Supreme Court, in a 6 to 3 decision, sided with Goguen, and ruled that the statute was too vague. The Court partially relied on prior decisions which prohibited states from compelling people to salute the flag: "neither the United States nor any State may require any individual to salute or express favorable attitudes toward the flag."

See also[edit]

• West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
• Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931)

External links[edit]

• Text of Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974) is available from: CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio)