|
→See also: Adding link to orphaned article, Wikiproject Orphanage: You can help!
|
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)
|
||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
==Criticisms== |
==Criticisms== |
||
COPPA is controversial and has been criticized as ineffective and potentially unconstitutional by legal experts<ref name="MateckiUpdate10">{{cite journal |title=Update: COPPA is Ineffective Legislation! Next Steps for Protecting Youth Privacy Rights in the Social Networking Era |journal=Journal of Lawn and Social Policy |author=Matecki, L.A. |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=7 |year=2010 |url=http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol5/iss2/7 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> and mass media<ref name="MagidUnin12">{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-magid/unintended-consequences-o_1_b_1741703.html |title=Unintended Consequences of FTC’s New COPPA Children’s Online Privacy Rules |author=Magid, L. |work=The Huffington Post |publisher=TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc |date=4 August 2012 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> since it was drafted <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pacificresearch.org/article/new-internet-privacy-rules-will-not-protect-kids/ |title=New Internet Privacy Rules Will Not Protect Kids}}</ref>. Complaints leveled against the legislation include website owners banning users 12 and under — which only "encourages age fraud and allows websites to bypass the burden of obtaining parental consent"<ref name="MateckiUpdate10" /> — and the active suppression of children's rights to freedom of speech, self-expression, and other [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] rights.<ref name="MagidProtect14">{{cite web |url=http://www.siliconvalley.com/larry-magid/ci_26432286 |title=Magid: Protecting children online needs to allow for their right to free speech |author=Magid, L. |work=The Mercury News |publisher=Digital First Media |date=29 August 2014 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref><ref name="MorrisAsk10">{{cite web |url=https://cdt.org/blog/ask-cdt-answers-on-first-amendment-rights-online/ |title=Ask CDT: Answers on First Amendment Rights Online |author=Morris, J. |work=CDT Blog |publisher=Center for Democracy and Technology |date=23 November 2010 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> |
COPPA is controversial and has been criticized as ineffective and potentially unconstitutional by legal experts<ref name="MateckiUpdate10">{{cite journal |title=Update: COPPA is Ineffective Legislation! Next Steps for Protecting Youth Privacy Rights in the Social Networking Era |journal=Journal of Lawn and Social Policy |author=Matecki, L.A. |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=7 |year=2010 |url=http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol5/iss2/7 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> and mass media<ref name="MagidUnin12">{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-magid/unintended-consequences-o_1_b_1741703.html |title=Unintended Consequences of FTC’s New COPPA Children’s Online Privacy Rules |author=Magid, L. |work=The Huffington Post |publisher=TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc |date=4 August 2012 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> since it was drafted <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pacificresearch.org/article/new-internet-privacy-rules-will-not-protect-kids/ |title=New Internet Privacy Rules Will Not Protect Kids}}</ref>. Complaints leveled against the legislation include website owners banning users 12 and under — which only "encourages age fraud and allows websites to bypass the burden of obtaining parental consent"<ref name="MateckiUpdate10" /> — and the active suppression of children's rights to freedom of speech, self-expression, and other [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] rights.<ref name="MagidProtect14">{{cite web |url=http://www.siliconvalley.com/larry-magid/ci_26432286 |title=Magid: Protecting children online needs to allow for their right to free speech |author=Magid, L. |work=The Mercury News |publisher=Digital First Media |date=29 August 2014 |accessdate=22 June 2016 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325192817/http://www.siliconvalley.com/larry-magid/ci_26432286 |archivedate=25 March 2016 |df= }}</ref><ref name="MorrisAsk10">{{cite web |url=https://cdt.org/blog/ask-cdt-answers-on-first-amendment-rights-online/ |title=Ask CDT: Answers on First Amendment Rights Online |author=Morris, J. |work=CDT Blog |publisher=Center for Democracy and Technology |date=23 November 2010 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> |
||
Delays in obtaining parental consent often result in children moving on to other activities that are less appropriate for their age.<ref name="PuckettIns13">{{cite web |url=http://www.emoderation.com/insider-insights-coppa/ |title=Insider insights on COPPA |author=Puckett, J.M. |work=Emoderation Blog |publisher=Emoderation Limited |date=14 May 2013 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> |
Delays in obtaining parental consent often result in children moving on to other activities that are less appropriate for their age.<ref name="PuckettIns13">{{cite web |url=http://www.emoderation.com/insider-insights-coppa/ |title=Insider insights on COPPA |author=Puckett, J.M. |work=Emoderation Blog |publisher=Emoderation Limited |date=14 May 2013 |accessdate=22 June 2016}}</ref> |
||
 | |
| Acronyms (colloquial) | COPPA |
|---|---|
| Effective | April 21, 2000 24 years ago |
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) is a United States federal law, located at 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506 (Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 105–277 (text) (PDF), 112 Stat. 2681-728, enacted October 21, 1998) 26 years ago.
The act, effective April 21, 2000, applies to the online collection of personal information by persons or entities under U.S. jurisdiction about children under 13 years of age. It details what a website operator must include in a privacy policy, when and how to seek verifiable consent from a parentorguardian, and what responsibilities an operator has to protect children's privacy and safety online including restrictions on the marketing of those under 13.[1]
While children under 13 can legally give out personal information with their parents' permission, many websites – particularly social media sites — disallow underage children from using their services altogether due to the cost and work involved in complying with the law.[2][3][4]
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the authority to issue regulations and enforce COPPA. Also under the terms of COPPA, the FTC-designated "safe harbor" provisioning is designed to encourage increased industry self-regulation. Under this provision, industry groups and others may request Commission approval of self-regulatory guidelines to govern participants' compliance, such that website operators in Commission-approved programs would first be subject to the disciplinary procedures of the safe harbor program in lieu of FTC enforcement. As of June 2016[update], the FTC has approved seven safe harbor programs operated by TRUSTe, ESRB, CARU, PRIVO, Aristotle, Inc., Samet Privacy (kidSAFE), and the Internet Keep Safe Coalition (iKeepSafe).[5][6]
In September 2011, the FTC announced proposed revisions to the COPPA rules, the first significant changes to the act since the issuance of the rules in 2000. The proposed rule changes expanded the definition of what it meant to "collect" data from children. The proposed rules presented a data retention and deletion requirement, which mandated that data obtained from children be retained only for the amount of time necessary to achieve the purpose that it was collected for. It also added the requirement that operators ensure that any third parties to whom a child's information is disclosed have reasonable procedures in place to protect the information.[7]
The act applies to websites and online services operated for commercial purposes that are either directed towards children under 13 or have actual knowledge that children under 13 are providing information online. Most recognized non-profit organizations are exempt from most of the requirements of COPPA.[1] However, the Supreme Court ruled that non-profits operated for the benefit of their members' commercial activities are subject to FTC regulation and consequently COPPA as well.[8] The type of "verifiable parental consent" that is required before collecting and using information provided by children under 13 is based upon a "sliding scale" set forth in a Federal Trade Commission regulation[9] that takes into account the manner in which the information is being collected and the uses to which the information will be put.
The FTC has brought a number of actions against website operators for failure to comply with COPPA requirements, including actions against Girls' Life,[10] American Pop Corn Company,[11] Lisa Frank, Inc.,[12] Mrs. Fields Cookies, and The Hershey Company.[13]
In February 2004, UMG Recordings, Inc. was fined US$400,000 for COPPA violations in connection with a web site that promoted the then 13-year-old pop star Lil' Romeo and hosted child-oriented games and activities, and Bonzi Software, which offered downloads of an animated figure "BonziBuddy" that provided shopping advice, jokes, and trivia was fined US$75,000 for COPPA violations.[14] Similarly, the owners of the Xanga website were fined US$1 million in 2006 for COPPA violations of repeatedly allowing children under 13 to sign up for the service without getting their parent's consent.[15] Other websites that were directed towards children and fined due to COPPA include Imbee (2008)[16] Kidswirl (2011),[17] and Skid-e-Kids (2011).[18]
In December 2012, the Federal Trade Commission issued revisions effective July 1, 2013, which created additional parental notice and consent requirements, amended definitions, and added other obligations for organizations that (1) operate a website or online service that is “directed to children” under 13 and that collects “personal information” from users or (2) knowingly collects personal information from persons under 13 through a website or online service.[19] After July 1, 2013, operators must:[20]
According to a notice issued by the Federal Trade Commission an operator has actual knowledge of a user’s age if the site or service asks for – and receives – information from the user that allows it to determine the person’s age.[22] An example cited by the FTC includes, an operator who asks for a date of birth on a site’s registration page has actual knowledge as defined by COPPA if a user responds with a year that suggests they’re under 13. Another example cited by the FTC that an operator may have actual knowledge based on answers to “age identifying” questions like “What grade are you in?” or “What type of school do you go to? (a) elementary; (b) middle; (c) high school; (d) college.”
A small fee is charged by Microsoft under COPPA as a way to verify parent consent. The fee is donated to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.[23] Google, however, charges the small fee as a way to verify one's date of birth.
In the changes effective July 1, 2013, the definition of an operator was updated to make clear that COPPA covers a child-directed site or service that integrates outside services, such as plug-ins or advertising networks, that collect personal information from its visitors.[24] The definition of a website or online service directed to children is expanded to include plug-ins or ad networks that have actual knowledge that they are collecting personal information through a child-directed website or online service. Websites and services that target children as a secondary audience may differentiate among users, and are required to provide notice and obtain parental consent only for those users who identify themselves as being younger than 13.[19] The definition of personal information requiring parental notice and consent before collection now includes “persistent identifiers” that can be used to recognize users over time and across different websites or online services. However, no parental notice and consent is required when an operator collects a persistent identifier for the sole purpose of supporting the website or online service’s internal operations.[24] The definition of personal information after July 1, 2013, also includes geolocation information, as well as photos, videos, and audio files that contain a child’s image or voice.[20]
On November 19, 2015, the FTC announced it had approved an additional method for obtaining verifiable parental consent: "face match to verified photo identification" (FMVPI). The two-step process allows a parent to submit a government-sanctioned ID for authentication, then submit an impromptu photo via mobile device or web camera, which is then compared to the photo on the ID.[25]
While COPPA is an American law, the Federal Trade Commission has made it clear that the requirements of COPPA will apply to foreign-operated web sites if such sites "are directed to children in the U.S. or knowingly collect information from children in the U.S."[26] Since it is US Federal law, it's applicable only to websites that are run:[1][9]
COPPA is controversial and has been criticized as ineffective and potentially unconstitutional by legal experts[27] and mass media[28] since it was drafted [29]. Complaints leveled against the legislation include website owners banning users 12 and under — which only "encourages age fraud and allows websites to bypass the burden of obtaining parental consent"[27] — and the active suppression of children's rights to freedom of speech, self-expression, and other First Amendment rights.[30][31]
Delays in obtaining parental consent often result in children moving on to other activities that are less appropriate for their age.[32]
In addition, age restrictions and the "parental consent" process is easy for children to circumvent, and parents generally help them to lie about their age.[33][34]
An Internet Safety Technical Task Force composed of experts from academia and commercial companies found in 2012 that mandatory age verification is not only a poor solution for privacy but also constitutes a violation of privacy.[35] The law has also many safety flaws. For example, it does not protect kids from predatory advertising,[36] it does not prevent kids from accessing pornography or lying about their age,[1] and it doesn't ensure a totally safe environment online. Tech journalist Larry Magid, a long-time vocal opponent of the law[28][30][37] — also notes that parents, not the government, hold the bulk of responsibility of protecting children online.[37] COPPA has also been criticized for its potential chilling effect on children's apps, content, websites and online services. For example, Snapchat released a Snapkidz version of its app in June 2013, but unlike Snapchat, Snapkidz didn't allow photo sharing at all due to COPPA regulations.[38] Similarly, it has been pointed out that the COPPA Rule was not necessarily about privacy protection but more about "enforcing the laws."[32]
COPPA's penalties ($40,000 per violation) can be potentially catastrophic for the small businesses, undermining their business model.[39][40] While some major corporations have enough money to pay the fine or implement a parental consent mechanism, small businesses often cannot afford it.
Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Facebook, has expressed opposition to COPPA and stated "That will be a fight we take on at some point. My philosophy is that for education you need to start at a really, really young age."[41]
{{cite journal}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 29 October 2013 suggested (help)
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
| International |
|
|---|---|
| National |
|
