Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KeyQaad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, PiginToWorld!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not saying you did anything wrong. It's just that I noticed among your first 20 edits you created not only a new draft, but also a category and a template. It probably took me 2,000 edits to even know what a template is! (But then, I am a slow learner...) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I did, I thought that added those things that was also in YBNL Nation will help get the article approved. 11:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) PinginToWorld (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well... no. They have no bearing on the draft's approval prospects. They may also get deleted at some point, as they're not really needed yet, but I don't really deal with either templates or cats, so will leave that for others to worry about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:
Please rework the draft as per earlier suggestion and do not resubmit before working on it. Thanks
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KeyQaad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for your contributions to KeyQaad. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please don't move drafts into the main space, like you did eg. with Sounds Cool and NSI Nation, when they provide no evidence of notability, and have already been repeatedly declined at AfC for that reason. Such articles will only be moved back to drafts, or else deleted, which is in no one's interests. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I thought they meet the criteria for the it. I'm sorry for not careful check and using tools that I'm not supposed to. I guess I will go back and learn more about it. Thanks for letting me know. PinginToWorld (talk) 09:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SkyLar Blatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KeyQaad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be revertedordeleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I still don't understand why @Ponyo blocked my account. This is the only account I have and have dedicated it to helping in adding more pages to wikipedia just like the drafts I was working on Draft:KeyQaad, Draft:SkyLar Blatt, and recently requested for Draft:Clever(rapper) to be undeleted so that I could work on it which was deleted under G13. Please I don't how my account happens to have anything to do with sockpuppet and it does not. Please I hope that is a mistake and hope that my account would be looked into more and hopefully be unblocked. Thank you.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
