This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
Make cable provider/channel number collapsable by country or continent?
The cable provider and channel list is getting kinda long as more and more countries get cable TV is there a way to make a collapsable list by country? So like "United States" may have within "DirecTV, Dish Network, Fios, Time Warner, Cox, etc." U.K. might have "Sky, etc., etc.... ", Canada "Rogers, Bell, Shaw, etc., etc." CaribDigita (talk) 00:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If not by country perhaps why not by continent? Africa, Americas , Asia, Europe, Oceania?
Raymie, The documentation does not list a dependency. It also says not to use |founded= unless it is different than |launch_date=. In this case, they are both 1990, so the founded date should really be removed since it is redundant. It could be argued in this case that |founder= should not be used due to non-notability. But in general, I think founded should display regardless of other parameters. Hidden dependencies just cause trouble, IMO. MB20:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MB, that was how the template was previously set up pre-code overhaul. Would you rather have it be a separate label/data? Raymie (t • c) 20:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Raymie, I do think that would be cleaner; it would be simple and avoid the problem with this infobox. There should be a way to have launch date and founder. MB23:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Raymie, I found an article today using both |web= and |website=, and there was no warning of conflicting parameters. It looks like if just one is used, there is no problem. If both are used, the value in website is used (which may be blank) and overrides whatever is in web=. Not sure if there are other parameters with potential conflicts. If there are just a few articles using web=, we could find and fix them and deprecate the para. Or we (you) could add the conflicting para code here. MB01:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MB, should I just get rid of |web=? There are also a couple other parameters with aliases: |tv_stations=/|tv_transmitters= (without underscore), |image_alt= and |alt=, and |language=/|languages=. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if there are not many uses. Do you want to add a tracking category so we can see the extent of the problem? MB01:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I might, since as an alias it does not split out in the template data report. The other param ones I'm probably keeping. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, MB, it comes out to at least 3,200 pages from briefly having a category in page. Guess I have to roll this in the PrimeBOT slogan-removing task that's delayed because it's substing out the Z templates. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok we could just keep it as an alias for website, but add a "clobbered parameter" check to catch only those cases where both are used - those are the only ones that really need to be addressed. MB04:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would probably save a lot of "cosmetic" edits (I don't think the "cosmetic bot day" every got approved!) MB05:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I need PrimeBOT to run anyway to ax the slogan tag, so I've simply added that to the request. It might be a while with all those Zs to remove. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sammi Brie, I was thinking about this again. What will Primebot do? I thought it only removed deprecated template parameters. In this case, it can't remove web or website since either could have a good value. Does it do more? Like only remove a para if it has no value. That would, hopefully, leave a small number article for manual cleanup. MB15:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just moved house and my PC is still in storage (which has all of my AWB settings), so this bot run is still probably a week or two out (sorry for the delay). If there's an issue with web/website and you are looking to get rid of "web", then I would do a check to see which parameter is used and store the value under |website= (or just keep website if web is also populated). Primefac (talk) 10:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd actually advocate going with your initial idea mainly because you also have a |webcast= parameter which then leads to ambiguity to what |web= was the editor referring to. And we all know editors always manage to surprise us. Gonnym (talk) 08:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we should deprecate |web= and only use |website=. But to do this properly, we have to manually determined what value to use in any articles that use currently have a value in both parameters. We shouldn't just blindly remove |web=. I believe Primefac is saying he can 1) remove web= if it is empty, 2) move values from web= to website= if website= is empty, 3) do nothing if both have values. After the bot run, anything left can be fixed manually. MB16:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an update, it might take a while to populate but I've set up a page for the clobbered params. I haven't edited any yet (still working through the slogans of a different template) but they mostly look like straight duplicates. Might still be worth cleaning them up manually since there are only 0. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
14 Done. A few were straight duplicates. Several had one value that I moved to |webcast=. If that is all there are/were, |web= can be completely removed now. MB15:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sammi Brie, Are you going to get primebot to remove these too? It has been over a month and there was no objection here (I realize you weren't the one that changed the template, but if you are coordinated the removal from the others...) MB23:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes MB, I have asked for this. PrimeBOT has been very tied up with deleting some 200 Z number templates that had tens of thousands of transclusions, but it has been requested. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Raymie (t • c) 23:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
