Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Principles of sumak kawsay  





2 History  





3 Definitions  





4 See also  





5 References  














Sumak kawsay






Català
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
Français
Galego
Hausa
Polski
Português
Runa Simi
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Sumak kawsay is a neologisminQuechua created in the 1990s by socialist Indigenous organizations. Originally created as a political and cultural proposal, Ecuadorian and Bolivian governments later adopted it in their constitutions. The term refers to the implementation of a socialism that moves away from Western socialist theory and instead embraces the ancestral, communitarian knowledge and lifestyle of Quechua people. In Ecuador, it has been translated as buen vivir or "good living", although experts in the Quechua language agree that a more precise translation would be "the plentiful life".[1] In Bolivia, the original term in Aymaraissuma qamaña, which has been translated as vivir bien or living well.[2]

In the original Quechua phrase, sumak refers to the ideal and beautiful fulfillment of the planet, and kawsay means "life," a life with dignity, plenitude, balance, and harmony. Similar ideas exist in other indigenous communities, such as the Mapuche (Chile), the Guaraní (Bolivia and Paraguay), the Achuar (Ecuadorian Amazon), the Guna (Panamá).

The Maya Tsotsil and Tseltal peoples pursue Lekil Kuxlejal (a fair-dignified life), which is considered equivalent to buen vivir and has influenced the development Neozapatismo.[3]

Since the 1990s, sumak kawsay has grown into a political project that aims to achieve collective wellbeing, social responsibility in how people relate to nature, and a halt to endless capital accumulation. This final aspect makes the project an alternative to traditional development.[4] Buen vivir proposes the collective realization of a harmonious and balanced life based on ethical values, in place of a development model that views human beings as an economic resource.[2] Indigenous movements in Ecuador and Bolivia, along with intellectuals, initially used the concept to define an alternative paradigm to capitalist development with cosmological, holistic, and political dimensions. The 2008 Constitution of Ecuador incorporated the concept of the rights of nature, as did the 2009 Constitution of Bolivia. Diverse theorists, such as economists Alberto Acosta and Magdalena León, say that sumak kawsay is not about a finished and completely structured theory, but rather an unfinished social proposal that can be improved.[citation needed]

Principles of sumak kawsay[edit]

The Andean philosopher Javier Lajo understands sumak kawsay as thinking well and feeling well in order to do well, with the ultimate goal of achieving harmony with the community, family, Nature, and universe.[5][unreliable source?] The ancestral sumak kawsay considers people as part of the Pachamama or Mother Earth. Unlike other paradigms, the modern buen vivir, inspired by indigenous traditions, looks for balance with Nature in the fulfillment of needs instead of mere economic growth.

Sumak kawsay is a paradigm based on five pillars:

  1. There is no life without knowledge or wisdom (Tucu Yachay)
  2. We all come from Mother Earth (Pacha Mama)
  3. Life is healthy (hambi kawsay)
  4. Life is collective (sumak kamaña)
  5. We all have an aspiration or a dream (Hatun Muskuy)[2]

Sumak kawsay, in the Andean conception, is the balance between feeling well (Allin Munay) and thinking well (Allin Yachay) which results in doing well (Allin Ruay) in order to achieve harmony, as explained by Lajo.[4]

This principle, rooted in the Andean indigenous cosmovision and ancestral knowledge in general, is based on:[6]

Sumak kawsay, living well, or splendid existence clashes with the idea of infinite progress. Pachamama or Mother Nature has a limit, which prevents unlimited development and growth at the cost of "the other"—nature, which includes human beings. Having a harmonious relationship requires re-knowing and applying complementarity and cooperation, not accumulation.[4]

Sumak kawsay contemplates a harmonious relationship with society, which is understood as a wide, globalized sphere, and the field of the dominant culture and system. With this, the concept seeks to recreate and apply interculturality and plurinationality, fundamental precepts to this proposed way of life.[6]

History[edit]

Researchers say it is difficult to trace the concept's use, but many agree that the theoretical and political proposal gained traction in the 1990s. In Ecuador, Indigenous movements emerged in full force and created a series of internal, educational initiatives and international cooperation programs that promoted the principles of good living. In Bolivia, suma qamaña appeared because of the work of indigenous movements and intellectual, leftist groups.[6]

According to the sociologist Guadalupe Rivadeneira, the concept of sumak kawsay has always existed. However, Amazonian Kichwas with the Pastaza Indigenous Peoples' Organization (OPIP) recently systematized the concept in 1994.[4]

Definitions[edit]

As a pluralistic concept, buen vivir has a variety of definitions. Eduardo Gudynas outlines eight core ideas for the concept: 1) create space for sharing critiques of development, 2) uplift ethical outlooks grounded in values, 3) center decolonization, 4) foster intercultural dialogue, 5) deny the nature–society binary, 6) reject manipulative and instrumental rationalities, 7) reject linear understanding of progress and 8) express feelings and affections. Overall, Gudynas endorses buen vivir as a framework for moving beyond modernity and development.[1]

David Choquehuanca explains:[7]

En esta línea se inserta en concepto del Buen Vivir, que se puede resumir en vivir en armonía con los demás seres humanos y la naturaleza, sobre la base de la unidad, la solidaridad y la empatía, retomando los principios ancestrales de los pueblos de la región. Esta mirada no es antropocéntrica y ni siquiera egocéntrica: formamos parte de la misma unidad y así como “nosotros somos montañas que caminan, los árboles son nuestros hermanos”, según Choquehuanca. Del mismo modo, el Buen Vivir es buscar la vida en comunidad, donde todos los integrantes se preocupan por todos. Lo más importante es la vida en un sentido amplio, no el individuo ni la propiedad. Tal cosmovisión en búsqueda de la armonía exige, como es obvio, la renuncia a todo tipo de acumulación

English translation: In this context, the concept of Buen Vivir is introduced, which can be summarized as living in harmony with other human beings and nature, based on unity, solidarity, and empathy, drawing from the ancestral principles of the peoples of the region. This perspective is neither anthropocentric nor egocentric: we are part of the same unity, and just as “we are mountains that walk, trees are our brothers,” according to Choquehuanca. Similarly, Buen Vivir is about seeking life in community, where all members care for one another. The most important thing is life in a broad sense, not the individual or property. Such a worldview in search of harmony requires, obviously, the renunciation of all forms of accumulation.

Luis Macas, Quechua lawyer and ex-president of CONAIE, wrote:[8]

…el Sumak, es la plenitud, lo sublime, excelente magnífico, hermoso(a), superior. Kawsay, es la vida, es ser estando. Pero es dinámico, cambiante, no es una cuestión pasiva. Por lo tanto el sumak kawsay sería la vida en plenitud. La vida en excelencia material y espiritual. (...) Para los Pueblos Indígenas o las Naciones Originarias, este concepto es producto de todo un acumulado histórico milenario, proviene desde su vivencia de hace miles de años, así como de las experiencias de lucha de resistencia de nuestras Naciones. Por lo tanto, este concepto no aparece de la casualidad, ni nace en la Constitución de la República Ecuatoriana, el Sumak Kawsay, se origina en el centro de la vida comunitaria, es la esencia del sistema de vida comunitaria y se explica en el ejercicio y práctica cotidiana de nuestras comunidades, es lo vital de la matriz civilizatoria de nuestros Pueblos, que aún tiene vigencia, a pesar de la interrupción violenta de la colonialidad y la agresión del modelo capitalista.

— Luis Macas

English translation: …Sumak is plenitude, the sublime, excellent, magnificent, beautiful, superior. Kawsay is life, it is being. But it is dynamic, changing, it is not a passive matter. Therefore, sumak kawsay would be life in plenitude. Life in material and spiritual excellence. (...) For Indigenous Peoples or Original Nations, this concept is the product of a millennial historical accumulation, coming from their experiences thousands of years ago, as well as from the experiences of resistance struggles of our Nations. Therefore, this concept does not appear by chance, nor is it born in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Sumak Kawsay originates in the heart of community life, it is the essence of the community life system and is explained in the daily exercise and practice of our communities. It is the vital element of the civilizational matrix of our Peoples, which still remains relevant despite the violent interruption of coloniality and the aggression of the capitalist model.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Gudynas, Eduardo (2011). "Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow". Development. 54 (4): 441–447. doi:10.1057/dev.2011.86. ISSN 1011-6370. S2CID 59059108.
  • ^ a b c "¿Qué es el Sumak Kawsay?". El Telégrafo (in Spanish). 7 April 2013. Retrieved 1 June 2024.
  • ^ University of Auckland; Albarran Gonzalez, Diana (2021-07-22). "Sjalel Lekil Kuxlejal: Mayan Weaving and Zapatismo in Design Research". Pluriversal Design Special Interest Group. Design Research Society. doi:10.21606/pluriversal.2021.0047. hdl:2292/63943. ISBN 978-1-912294-43-5.
  • ^ a b c d Rivadeneira Nuñez, Guadalupe (20 September 2013). "El Sumak Kawsay en Sumpa, Santa Elena". La Línea de Fuego (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  • ^ Lajo, Javier (28 February 2008). "¿Qué dice el Sumaj Kawysay? La escuela indígena de "Qhapaj Ñan"". Sumak Kawsay (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 8 March 2022. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  • ^ a b c Garcia Álvarez, Santiago (June 2013). "Sumak kawsay o buen vivir como alternativa al desarrollo en Ecuador" (PDF). Universidad Complutense Madrid (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  • ^ López, Patricio (31 October 2015). "El 'Buen Vivir' según el canciller de Bolivia, David Choquehuanca" (in Spanish). Radio Universidad de Chile. Retrieved 1 June 2024.
  • ^ Macas, Luis. "El Sumak Kawsay" (PDF). Decrecimiento y Buen Vivir (in Spanish). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 1 June 2024.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sumak_kawsay&oldid=1226749794"

    Categories: 
    Quechua
    Culture of Ecuador
    Culture of Bolivia
    1990s neologisms
    Socialism of the 21st century
    Indigenous people of the Andes
    Latin American studies
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from June 2024
    All articles lacking reliable references
    Articles lacking reliable references from June 2021
     



    This page was last edited on 1 June 2024, at 15:51 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki