Contents

Talk:.476 Enfield

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .476 Enfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from .476 Enfield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,276 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that despite their names, the revolver cartridge .476 Enfield, .455 Webley, .476 Eley, and .455 Colt all interchange? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/December.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: National / Technology / Weaponry / British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force British military history task force European military history task force United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I tagged WP Canada & WP LEO, since the .476 Enfield Mk 1 revolver was a NWMP weapon. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 05:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the WP Canada tag, as the connection is very minor. PKT(alk) 16:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not if somebody can get a pic here... TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 01:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-removed the WP Canada tag, this article is not within the scope of the project. PKT(alk) 16:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added some there; hope that addresses the issue. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.4.142.104 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also changed them in the source titles, which is a wrong change. Also, you could (should) have simply said this in the edit summary. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.130.70 (talk) 11:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After trying and checking with my collection I found this round only can loaded when the Revolver is marked 455/476. This means the chamber is tapered in shape, not steped like the normal chamber in the normal .455 round. The book: Cartridges of the World is wrong so don't quote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nambu44 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]