Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Liu Zhuo  
1 comment  




2 Uncited rhetoric in the Just Intonation section  
2 comments  




3 Confusion between well and equal  
1 comment  













Talk:12 equal temperament




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Liu Zhuo[edit]

Should Liu Zhuo's theory of 12-tone equal temperament (which he developed in 604, during China's Sui Dynasty) be mentioned in this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited rhetoric in the Just Intonation section[edit]

Hi. I'm new to editing here and don't know how to cite sources, but I am very experienced in the subject of Just Intonation, microtonality, etc. Currently there's a lot of uncited rhetoric in the Just Intonation approximations section, for example (paraphrasing) "Humans consider a difference of around a quarter of a semitone to be in-tune" - which is simply not true. In actuality the Just Noticeable Difference (JND) is around 5-6 cents, meaning we can differentiate between pitches 5 cents apart. Therefore, the 5th harmonic is considerably out of tune in 12-ET; although 12-ET is an economical solution for the 5-limit, it is certainly not a very accurate one. In addition, the article dismisses the importance of 17- and 19-limit intervals, again, without citations. I propose the 17-limit and above sections be deleted entirely, as there is almost no literature that seems to exist the topic whatsoever, and the literature I could find was a passing mention in an analysis of the compositions of Ben Johnston. Without actual scholarly sources on 17-limit and above intervals and their importance to harmony, it's Wikipedia:Original research to claim that they are "not useful for most purposes." I propose we cut the higher-limit section entirely, and make sure to find good, academic sources for the other sections.

Sorry if I'm doing anything wrong by bringing it up here, it's my first edit to the site! Ascendedxen (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ascendedxen: This is exactly the right place to raise your concern. Uncited claims can be flagged like I just did (a bot will come round soon and date them). If no one supplies a reference to back up the claims, after a reasonable time these can be removed. In the meantime feel free to improve the text. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 08:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between well and equal[edit]

The text states that equal temperament was used throughout the Baroque era. Is that really true? In reading Kyle Gann's stuff, he says that equal temperament wasn't widely used until the 20th century. If Gann is correct, then this article is confusing equal temperament with well temperament systems. Whoever wrote this probably needs to pick up several history books. I'd like to see a clear discussion of the historical development of equal temperament popularity and a clear discussion of how well temperament differs from equal. Relatedly, there's hardly anything in the Well temperament article as well. – ishwar  (speak) 07:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:12_equal_temperament&oldid=1195357844"

Categories: 
B-Class Music theory articles
Mid-importance Music theory articles
WikiProject Music theory articles
 



This page was last edited on 13 January 2024, at 14:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki