This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2017, when it received 14,934,202 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report13 times. The weeks in which this happened:
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– I have already nominated two requested moves today, unrelated to this. That does not seem to be illegal, so I ahve gone forward with this. There does not seem to be an unwritten rule that says the TV series is spelt with 13 and the novel is spelt with Thirteen. Just doing this to figure out the consensus. 122.60.65.44 (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A big problem here is that the WP:COMMONNAME for the TV series is actually "13 Reasons Why", plus that's how Netflix is referring to it in the promotional media and their press site, despite the fact it uses the stylized "Thirteen Reasons Why" in the title intro card. So the proposal In ictu oculi offered, while the easiest thing to do, wouldn't work. Something should definitely be done here, but I am not sure what really. If you were to move them as 13 Reasons Why → 13 Reasons Why (TV series) and Thirteen Reasons Why → Thirteen Reasons Why (novel), you wouldn't be able to have a consistent primary disambiguation title either (13 Reasons Why or Thirteen Reasons Why). So my stance is to keep the titles as it is right now because their hatnotes should be able to bring awareness to the readers of which way to go. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It must be pointed out that the cover for the first edition of the novel spells Thirteen Reasons WhyasTh1rteen R3asons Why. That is where Netflix got the idea to stylize the name like that in the first place. However, all references to the Netflix presentation, on Netflix' official sites and elsewhere, are to 13 Reasons Why. Not a rule, unwritten or otherwise, just simple fact. There is a clear demarcation between the two without having to add on which came from which media. Use of Template:About suffices for any disambiguation related to how they might sound alike. — Myk Streja(beep)18:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sreed103.
@Joeyconnick: There was no discussion on said tag and I didn't think the tag was currently applicable to the page (the criticism as it stands is not undue and if someone were to try to "fix" it is there's the risk of creating a WP:FALSEBALANCE). So I removed it. I don't take issue with you reinstating the tag per se but if that's the only reason you reinstated it, I was hoping you'd reconsider why it was necessary to do so? What I did is not unheard of. Clovermoss🍀(talk)08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sreed103.
