Contents

Talk:1692 Jamaica earthquake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1692 Jamaica earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from 1692 Jamaica earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the 1692 Jamaica earthquake, which destroyed Port Royal, occurred at 11:43 a.m., according to a stopped pocket watch found in the harbour? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/January.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 7, 2010, June 7, 2013, June 7, 2016, June 7, 2018, and June 7, 2022.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Earthquakes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Caribbean: Jamaica Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Jamaica (assessed as Mid-importance). Piracy This article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.PiracyWikipedia:WikiProject PiracyTemplate:WikiProject PiracyPiracy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Piracy To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Piracy: Requests: John Lopez (pirate), Lords of the Spanish Main, Benjamin Bennett (governor) (see What links here), Thomas Walker (pirate), Richard Bishop (pirate) Expand: Charles Vane, Edward England, Emanuel Wynn, George Lowther, Pierre Le Grand, Roche Braziliano, Thomas Cocklyn, Woodes Rogers, Piracy in the Indian Ocean Verify: Daniel Johnson (pirate), Henry Jennings, François l'Olonnais, Olivier Levasseur, Edward Davis (buccaneer) Copyedit: Golden Age of Piracy Images: MVDelight, MVPowerful,

The description of the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone is contained solely within the island of Hispaniola and therefore too far away to affect Jamaica. Either the attribution of fault is wrong, or the description of EP Garden fault appears to be too narrow. Can someone help? Student7 (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I think I understand the problem. The fault zone is described from east to west, which seems back to front to me, but I'm not sure why. As it says in the article, it starts in Hispaniola, in the Dominican Republic near the Enriquillo Lake, passing through Haiti, then through the Caribbean Sea finishing at the Plantain Garden River area in Jamaica. Mikenorton (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1692 Jamaica earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091217203828/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/events/1692_06_07.phptohttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/events/1692_06_07.php
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jcoba.org.jm/earthquake/files/DeformJaGPS2007.pdf
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5gwhvRCJL?url=http://www.esp.org/books/lyell/principles/facsimile/contents/lyell-v1-ch25.pdftohttp://www.esp.org/books/lyell/principles/facsimile/contents/lyell-v1-ch25.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the linked source says the watch was found in 1969, there is an article in this newspaper http://mbc.malopolska.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=99506 (page 2) dated from 1960 that already reports this discovery. 109.232.29.145 (talk) 10:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the 1969 date is a typo in the cited source as it clearly was in 1959, found during the "shakedown" archaeological expedition of the Sea Diver II see Edwin A. Link 1904­-1981 by Martha Clark Revised by Jeanne Eichelberger. I'm still looking for a good source to confirm all this - currently I have a set of sources that together support this conclusion, but it would be a lot easier to use a single source. Thanks for pointing this out. Mikenorton (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the end I had to use two sources, but together they do the job of supporting the date of the watch's recovery. Mikenorton (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These two quotes were taken from the Little source (ref. 2), although they are used in quotes there, so they must have already been well known. Unfortunately they are uncited in the source. I need to rewrite that citation as the quotes come from a chapter by Donny L. Hamilton, who has written a great deal on Port Royal. Mikenorton (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]