Contents

Talk:1790–91 United States House of Representatives elections

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Seat totals don't add up[edit]

According to the infobox at the top of the page, 39 Pro-Administrationists and 30 Anti-Administrationists were elected to the 2nd House of Representatives. The accompanying map, however, as well as the table of state totals, shows the Pro-Administration party with 40 seats and the Anti-Administration party with 29 after late elections in Vermont and Kentucky are taken into account (while the state results table lists the "total" number of Pro-Administration members as "39," adding the number of Pro-Administration members from each state given in the table above yields a sum of 40). The U.S. House of Representatives Office of the Historian, a source for this article, gives 39–30 as the partisan composition of the House at the beginning of the 1791–1793 session. It is not clear what the source is for the state totals depicted in either the map or the state results table.

I don't want to delete these graphics wholesale, but there is clearly an error somewhere—either the infobox numbers are incorrect, or the map/table are. Personally, I'm inclined to believe 39–30 is the correct statistic because it is backed up by the official historian of the House, but I can't be sure where the error lies (or how to correct it) without a source for the state-by-state results of the election. Any insight into the source for the map/table or an alternative source for the state results would be appreciated. Nathaniel Greene (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Nathaniel Greene: The map is in error: Kentucky should not be included as its elections were not until 1792. —GoldRingChip 03:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have removed Kentucky from the map. —GoldRingChip 13:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank-you! Nathaniel Greene (talk) 23:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Maryland listed as having been dominated by the "Chesapeak Party"? I didn't see any sources for it and the article doesn't elaborate on it. LABoy12 (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]