A fact from 1868 Hawaii earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Many place names in Hawaii are duplicated. I fixed several of the links to point to what I think are the correct ones. For example, the Keauhou is the one now abandoned in Volcanoes National Park, not the one on the west coast. And of course Punaluʻu is the beach nearby, not on Oʻahu. W Nowicki (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another nit: the USGS (otherwise a good source) mis-spelled Keaīwa as Keiawa. The original documents generally use Keaiva or Keaiwa, and GNIS has Keaīwa. I will also add the notable person who lived there and generated some of the reports. W Nowicki (talk) 20:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article gives a possible range for the number of casualties (31-77), which is the sum of the number of casualties from the landslide (31) and the tsunami (46). Why the range, instead of giving the number of casualties as 77? Renerpho (talk) 13:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Aftershocks continue to the present day? Unreachabke source
There is a statement in the first paragraph that aftershocks continue to the present day. The source is unreachable and i doubt is reliable. It does not make sense that aftershocks continue 100 years after the quake. People who claim that need to learn how to read the formulas. Andru nl (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've reverted your edit but removed the dead URL, as the full text can be accessed through the doi link. If you still find this source unacceptable after reading the paper, then let's discuss it here. Mikenorton (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
