Contents

Talk:1904 United States presidential election

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance). Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

formatting messed up under firefox

[edit]

The table in this page gets mostly clobbered by the NYT newspaper image in Firefox. Could some formatting guru look into it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.202.80.51 (talk) 01:54, 21 March 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto on Safari. --Jfruh 02:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Why is the graphic depiction of electoral votes skewed? Rarely nowadays does one see democratic votes colored red and and republican votes blue. --maru (talk) Contribs 20:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This post has been copied to Wikipedia talk:Style for U.S. presidential election, yyyy#Electoral picture peculiarity. Please direct your responses there.

— DLJessup (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roosevelt won Maryland by 51 votes according to the US Election Atlas link. On the pictured NY Times front page, Maryland is listed under TR. Why did 7 of Maryland's 8 electoral votes go to Parker? 74.12.156.161 02:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland used the system whereby each elector was voted for separately. A Roosevelt elector got the single highest number of votes but Parker electors got the next seven highest. There also seems to have been a lot of Democrat chicanery in the state. The "Wilson Law" is hard to track on the net but this account details some biases: [1]. Timrollpickering (talk) 11:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have the map from 1900!!!Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a seeming throw away line about Parker running a "racist campaign" against Roosevelt, yet no mention of this anywhere else on the page, or in Parker's own Wiki page. This seems a bit out of place considering that every other description of the election says it was "marked by goodwill" and that both candidates were "first rate". A cite detailing Parker's racism would be appreciated! HandsomeSam57 (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States presidential election, 1904. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160604012408/https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1232194791/inlinetohttps://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1232194791/inline

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]