Contents

Talk:1996 Pacific Northwest floods

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Idaho / History / Washington / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help! Weather: Non-tropical / Floods Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Oregon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofOregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article was created or improved during The 2022 C/B Class DriveofWikiProject Weather, which started in January 2022 and is ongoing. You can help!

Hey everyone!

Hoping to reach out to @DJ Cane to get his view on adding a "See also" link, whether or not -

- would be a good idea under the Western Washington and Oregon subsection. Or if not, a See also link at the bottom of the page?

Not sure what would be best so coming here before making any changes based on connectivity to this flood disaster with other articles.

Thanks!

Shortiefourten (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Shortiefourten!

I lean toward not doing a see also but am not directly opposed to it. I edited the prose to add a wl directly in to give you and other editors a view of what that would look like. Let me know if you think this is sufficent or if you still lean toward the see also being put into that section.

Thanks DJ Cane _(he/him) (Talk) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Cane,

Your solution is spot on. Thinking about it now, mine would've caused clutter simply for a subsection link. Had it been an article about the 1996 flooding in the Chehalis Valley, maybe a different story.

I know we don't WP:OWN our efforts, but when you come across an excellent article like this one you started, I believe in reaching out first before stepping on great work.

Thanks for the wikilink and see you around!

Shortiefourten (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to help and happy to collaborate in the future! DJ Cane _(he/him) (Talk) 04:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]